Colorado Injustice

 Rumble:

Bitchute

Claudine Gay: Not An AA Case

I was listening to Radio Derb over the weekend where he said that Harvard president Gay was clearly an Affirmative Action case because she's not the best and brightest. This is similar to many of the online comments I've seen.

it's incorrect and I'm going to tell you why.

First, let's get the plagiarism out of the way. That is an entirely different subject and to be entirely honest, much of lefty "academia" is nonsense to begin with. Much of it is not reproducible and much of the assumptions underlying them are unfalsifiable. That one of them would plagiarize on top of all that doesn't surprise me in the least bit. But even IF that is the case, she would STILL not be an AA case.

The best and brightest are rarely the best able to manage large organizations. The best and brightest are usually very, VERY skilled in a particular field and are poor managers.

What does a president of a university really have to do? 

Are they actually scholars?

No.

Are they rocket scientists or those finding cures for cancer?

No.

Therefore, being the "best and brightest" is NOT the qualification for president of a university. A university president is the big picture person. 

When Trump ran for office, my support of him was not because I thought he was the best and brightest or most experienced. Clearly if that was the criteria, I would have supported Clinton. No, Trump had the right ideas and I thought he was bright enough to surround himself with the people with the expertise (best and brightest) to advise him and execute the vision. He failed on that front on many issues except SCOTUS.

Similarly Gay's job was to provide or execute the Harvard Vision. What is the current Harvard Mission?

WOKE nonsense.

Gay was and is supremely qualified to direct that vision. As a matter of fact, as far as I have read she has executed on that front quite well. When the challenge came, Gay was supported by the board AND faculty 100%. As someone who has been in education for over 2 decades, I can tell you that you rarely get faculty on board to that extent on "controversial" issues.

This means that the problem is not Gay. The focus on Gay is a distraction from the cesspool that Harvard and other institutions of higher propagandizing have become. Gay would not have her job if Harvard had an actual academic vision.

So no, Gay is not an Affirmative Action case. She is supremely qualified for the job that Harvard advertised. So are the other presidents similarly situated. It is a mistake to concentrate on her just so a "scalp" can be had. The entire organization is the problem. Until then, even if Gay is removed, the real issue will persist.

This Bad...

 Ran across this today:

If this continues long term NY is in trouble. I don't know how much of the exodus is from upstate NY, which is already in trouble, but still.  Expect to see more money grabs (congestion pricing increases soon after it starts as some people stop driving into NY. See speed traps across the state, in the name of safety of course. Don't you know the ticket you get days after endangering a highway worker saved his life?

More pushes for the end of work from home as the need for commuting revenue for the MTA and costs ancillary to commuting can "fill the coffers".

Eric Adams already said he's open to increasing city taxes. 

Keep it up, NY. Keep it up.

Garvey's Ghost TV 12-11-2023: The Maskholes are At It Again

 Rumble

Bitchute

Two topics today
The Obvious Double Standard of Campus Speech
23:00: COVID JN1: The Maskholes Are Big Mad Again.

Make 'Em Unwelcome

 

He did it. Governor DeSantis actually convinced one of the libs to move to Canada. A mark of distinction. pic.twitter.com/Gg3zoV7P9Y

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) December 4, 2023

In one of my Garvey's Ghost TV episodes recently, I can't remember which, I mentioned that what sane people need to do, particularly with the child groomers in the schools is to make them feel *very* unwelcome.

They should be denied any and every service they can be legally denied. They should be subject to dirty looks and the like. I'm actually for far more "aggressive" things but I wouldn't want to be liable for incitement.

That said, I think what Chris Rufo posted is proof that making them unwelcome is a winning strategy. Thankfully it is the state doing it, one of the things they *should* be doing, rather than the locals having to do it.

Once these pedophiles, groomers and their enablers understand that their behavior is not going to be tolerated and their careers dead ended in YOUR town, they will pick up and leave. Just like any other evil person, when they meet real resistance they move along to easier targets.

I worked in higher ed for 20+ years and the bad thing is that there are a LOT of these types in the pipeline. Schools with sane policies and sane students will need to push out more students to fill the gap. And remember that these folks will leave Florida and come to YOUR state and your town. You check the internet for these folks so they don't end up messing with your children's heads and doing irreparable damage.

No. Not The Government's Job

 

One thing that has become very clear since The Covid Happening is the extent to which the US state is essentially a form of soft socialism. Government agents declared they had rights to tell you where you could go, and when. They could tell you what to put on your face and then what they could put into your body. So called "emergencies" were the ever present loopholes by which the state could just up and decide what the market does.

Climate emergency, No more gasoline powered cars. Who gave the government such power?

Bloomberg decided that you shouldn't be able to get a soda.

Murphy and Cuomo decided you couldn't get a plastic or paper bag when you go buy your food.

Now come the 15 min cities, congestion pricing being the gateway drug for that.

But that's not the topic. No, the topic is that some genius thinks it is the job of NYC to end diabetes.

The report calls for the opening more diabetes treatment centers in hospitals in poor neighborhoods, overhauling Medicaid reimbursement to cover more diabetes monitoring and prevention programs, expanding healthier food options in underserved communities and sponsoring public health campaigns

As is usual with Democrats, everybody has an angle on how to get paid off the taxpayer dime.

Here's the deal, Type II diabetes is almost 100% the cause of lifestyle choices of the person so afflicted. They literally ate and sat their way into the disease. It was their choice. Neither the city nor the state of NY (or the feds) need to do anything for persons so situated.

There is plenty of advice out there on how to eat (and live) to prevent Type II diabetes.  If you have a smartphone with Rumble or YouTube, you can find this stuff out easily. 

Your health is YOUR job. Too many people want to hand that responsibility to daddy state and then have daddy state expropriate money from the rest of us to enforce dumb and intrusive programs in order for the "do gooders" to feel like they are "doing something".

Also, this is a sneaky means of getting the state to promote vegan and vegetarianism. I'm glad Mayor "Bull Connor" Adams found his results in a plant based diet but that is not the only means of dealing with Type II diabetes.  The reason it worked for him (and other diets for others) is because these diets severely limit the amount of added sugar and carbs a person intakes. That is the no. 1 key.

See. Solid advice with nary a taxpayer dime spent.

Garvey's Ghost TV: 11-25-2023: In Time

Rumble:

BitChute

4:00 Congestion Pricing Comparison with the movie In Time.

21:00: From The River To The Sea...

33:00: You DO Realize CO2 is plant food...?

43:00: London Plague! Africans Most Affected.

50:00: I Thought Race Was A Social Construct

 

Veganist "Ideology" On a Whole Other Level

Vegan Final Boss!! pic.twitter.com/2PYJJtbMjo

— Dr Shawn Baker 🥩 (@SBakerMD) November 26, 2023

It Was Only A Matter Of Time

NYS is now using the speed cameras on interstates. 

For your safety of course.

"Many New York drivers are unaware that automated speeding tickets are even legal on highways, but a law legalizing the process was quietly passed in 2021 and is now being implemented in the Hudson Valley and other areas around the state."

I'm sure it was silent. 

The New York State Department of Transportation says that these infractions will not result in points on your license and information will not be sent to insurance companies. Because the automated speeding infraction is a civil offense, there are no criminal implications.

No points and nothing sent to insurance companies. Sounds like a money grab to me. I mean if speeding is so dangerous then speeders should be arrested on the spot. You know and I know that the speeding thing is a scam to raise revenue for local municipalities. It is not that there aren't people who  reckless, but this does nothing to address that.  If you're on 87, a three lane wide highway in most parts, with no one around you, doing 80,90 MPH you are not a danger to anyone, including yourself. 

Doing such a speed in a school zone IS dangerous. It's not the speed, it's the conditions and they know it. Now, you, being a danger to nobody will get a ticket [tax] for simply going about your business because some busybody who got elected to office, thinks it's a great idea.

NY residents will vote these people back into office though.

It sure is interesting that as cars gain more and more safety features, that speed limits don't go up but fines do (or are created).

Meanwhile, I saw a guy yesterday with tires is such bad shape that the rubber was peeling away from the steel cords. No police officer will be stopping him. No auto-fine will send him a ticket, and most certainly he is a danger to himself AND those around him. 

Just another example of the government clearly just taxing citizens with false claims of safety.

Gotta pay for those illegal aliens somehow I suppose.

Trumpenomics Vs. Bidenomics

 

Any questions?

So It's Like That?

In the United States, you have a right to stomp on and burn the national flag. You have the absolute right to advocate for ending the US as a sovereign state. I recall back in the day, after the Rodney King verdict, participating in a a number of protests that included many calls to end the US and involved aforementioned flag burning. This all happened on the campus of a private university.  No one in the administration dared even peep about consequences of such actions.

My how times have changed.

"A Massachusetts-based private university has banned a student chapter of the National Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) on its campus amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict, becoming the first U.S.-based private university to do so. "

Banning a student organization based on political stands is discrimination. But this is a private university so it can do so, within limits.  But that's not really the interesting part.

 

“SJP has called on its chapters to engage in conduct that supports Hamas in its call for the elimination of the only Jewish state in the world and its people,” the school’s spokesperson said in its statement to The Hill. “Such expression is not protected by Brandeis’ principles of free speech.”

“Students are welcome to express their support for Palestinians in a manner that complies with our rights and responsibilities,” the spokesperson concluded.

This wording is interesting because the university claims that the organization engages in conduct that supports Hamas in it's call for the elimination of the only Jewish state. Note that they did NOT say that said organization supported the  means by which Hamas goes about it's "call". No, they said that the conduct supports the aim. The university has decided that any speech that does not support the state of Israel is  "not protected".

That is mighty strange for a US university. I will remind the reader that it has been standard practice to protect all manner of anti-American speech on university campuses. Why is it that being anti not America, is somehow afforded less "protection"? If anything speech that is anti-American ought to be the "not protected" speech.

Lest you think I protest too much, note that the university goes on to state that THEY are the arbiter of what proper "support for Palestinians" entails.

Ahhh the university as speech police.

It's very interesting to see where alumni and administrations have drawn the line on speech, given they have coddled and even supported speech in it's DEI departments that call for the elimination of "whiteness" (wink, wink).

It would be nice if universities went back to the entire "so long as it is legal" standard when it comes to speech.

Garvey's Ghost TV 10-30-2023: Only When You Do It

Rumble:

BitChute:

 

5:00: Shall Not Be Infringed
10:30: Jenna Ellis Pleads Guilty to Constitutional Right.
20:00: Wishing to be wealthy is a felony in NY!
26:00: They Knew It Was Experimental But Forced Us Anyway
33:00: ...And Now They Want Forgiveness.
42:00: Dems Suddenly Concerned about Body Autonomy.

Dr. John Eastman on Trump RICO Charges

 I previously mentioned the ridiculousness of the charges filed against Trump. Here's one of the "indicted co-conspirators" on the subject:

NZ Elites Got Jab Exemption

 Following up on the video from yesterday where people were murdered by "treatment"; And yes, I'm calling it murder, David Knight reports on the NZ elites  who exempted themselves from the Jab mandates.

You think it's only NZ?

Straight Up Murder

 Take 50 min out of your day to watch the video here:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/the-truth-about-covid-hospital-protocols-stella-paul-5510929?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf

 I knew about Remdesir and I knew about the vents. I wrote about them. What I did not know was that they actually tied people to their beds when they were trying to take the ventilators off.

Palestine Hightlights 'Conservative" Racial Blindspot

 I recall when the whole Trayvon Martin killing occured. As I saw the facts come out, I saw many so called dissident conservatives saying that the killing of Trayvon was justified because Trayvon attacked Zimmerman. It was as if the entire event only started with the fight. Even to this day they still mis-represent the case and of course now use the trial as proof. Never mind that a trial was NOT proof enough in the case of OJ Simpson.

The facts of the case, for those unfamiliar are as follows:

Trayvon was visiting his father. Trayvon went to the local "bodega" to get some skittles and Iced Tea or some other drink. That detail is unimportant. Last I checked going to and from a store was not a sign of criminal activity.

On the way back from the store, Zimmerman saw Trayvon and decided to follow him. He followed close enough that Trayvon noticed. In court testimony it was revealed that he told a friend on the phone that he was being followed by a "creepy ass cracker" or something close to that effect.

Again, walking down the street, while on the phone is not a crime or reasonable suspicion of a crime. It's your right. Now a normal person, even if they suspected wrongdoing or potential wrongdoing would follow the person but not engage unless they saw an actual crime. Zimmerman however decided to not only follow Trayvon (stalking) but then exited his vehicle to confront Trayvon who was doing nothing wrong.

Trayvon, fearing for his life, decided to take on his stalker. He failed and died.

I would absolutely put hard cash down that if the races were reversed, Zimmerman would have been the dead hero who thwarted the attempts of a black assailant to rob him.

Some commentators went to such lengths to say that Trayvon should have identified himself to Zimmerman as if black people need to explain there presence to random white people on demand.

According to these conservatives if you have the position I do, it must be some BLM informed position. No, BLM is a fraud organization and Trayvon is still  the victim.

So conservatives wonder why they can't get blacks to support them when they get obvious stuff like this wrong. 

Similarly white conservatives cannot fathom why black people do not have a dim view of Mumia Abu Jamaal or Assata Shakur. They are aghast that these two shot police. Since these conservatives worship at the feet of police, many of whom turned on them when those lock downs happened, they cannot fathom how blacks could be friendly to someone who shot at them. For these conservatives, black persons who had run in with police must be criminals. Jan 6 notwithstanding.

These conservatives act as if COINTELPRO was (and is) not a thing. That many police, particularly at that time were hostile to black movements and often had standing orders to liquidate them.

These conservatives want us to act like Fred Hampton wasn't shot in his bed or Philly literally dropped a bomb on a house.

Now we have the attack on Israel by Hamas. As is the case for the occupied government that is the US, supposed US representatives went out of their way to support Israel and whatever they do in response. One such representative actually wore the military uniform of a foreign government (guess) to the chamber of government.

But the point here is that so called conservatives, were quick to denoun anyone who had any critique of Israel, including the fact that Israel didn't exist prior to 1948 and perhaps THAT is THE source of the problem.

They don't want to hear any of that.

The problem here is that black Americans remember this thing called slavery and segregation. They supported the ANC. Gaza  and the West Bank are no different from Bantustans. Colonialism went out of style in the 1960s and Israel is effectively the last European colony (It was ruled by the British). Supporting colonialism is simply not going to fly with African-Americans. To be frank, it shouldn't fly with anybody.

But these so called conservatives who uphold property rights, can't be bothered with discussing how people's property was taken to create Israel. And they think they are going to win black votes with this attitude?

Which brings me to a question. Why this blind spot. Would any of these conservatives argue FOR apartheid South Africa today?  A recolonization of Kenya, Uganda, Ghana? Perhaps Nigeria?

I don't think they would but perhaps I give them too much credit. So, if they wouldn't argue for such a thing why do they support the colonization of Palestine?

Ah yes, Arabs. MUSLIMS and the fear of Jihad. Well you know Steve Sailor talks about Invade the world, invite the world. You don't have to do either of them. Of course some of these conservatives have their attitude because they are Christians and they are looking for the second coming. Which of course will lead to the eternal damnation of the non-believers. Including Jews...

Yeah, I'm not dumb enough to support Democrats at the ballot box but don't mistake that for support for colonialism or Zionism. To be honest conservatives ought not have allowed BLM or Antifa to capture that argument. 

History shows that oppression breeds violence. Not everyone goes silently into that great goodnight. For me, or any black person to deny that would be to deny Nat Turner and other slave uprisings that took "innocent lives".  Republicans are not going to win over any formerly colonized or enslaved people by supporting a colony without exception. 

Perhaps Republicans and conservatives are OK with not gaining ground with that group. In such a case, there is always expanding the share of the white vote. Just allow it to get bad enough for them before you run out of them to "share".

Garvey's Ghost Palestine Peace Plan

 Here is The Ghost's proposed peace plan for Palestine.

1) There is a One State solution. There is no "State of Israel". There is no "State of Palestine". There is a state with an agreed upon name. I suggest "Judea" or "Jerusalem" or something else historical to both parties.

2) The Bantustans are ended. Palestinians are 1005 free to live and conduct their business as any other citizen of the state of [enter name from item 1].

3) Land Justice:

   A) Palestinians are to be compensated for the land taken from them to create what was previously Israel.To that end there are 2 options:

    1) Payment at current land and/or property value to whoever owned the land prior to 1948. In the case that person is dead, their immediate family can be paid. This can be split among siblings.

    2) Rental payment to previous Palestinian owners at market rates. As with item one descendants can be paid where the previous owner is deceased.

3) Failing to abide by items One or Two, Settler family or their descendants must vacate the premises. Where the prior owner is unknown or cannot be found, the funds will go to establish a bank available to the previously disenfranchised.

In return. Hamas, Palestinian Authority, Islamic Jihad and whatever other armed group is to be disbanded. Any person found to be a member of such a group after the agreement is in effect shall be executed.

Once the agreement is settled, the border of the state shall be recognized by all parties, aggression against this state shall be condemned and any retaliation recognized as justified. This includes atomic and other mass destruction weapons.

Religious and ethnic based violence will not be tolerated. Any party engaging in such violence shall be executed. In cases where that person is caught *in the act* such execution shall be summary and immediate.

Once agreed upon, "bygones are bygones". Any party found to be conspiring for retaliation due to pre-agreement incidents will be imprisoned and their all assets confiscated.

At the implementation of The Agreement, the current government is dissolved. A caretaker government will run for 6 months, in order for elections to be held. This caretaker government shall only do as much as is necessary to run the government. No legislation shall be passed (other than needed to run the government) until the new government is seated.

 

Of course there are details to be hashed out but this is the most equitable solution that addresses the root cause of the conflict.

Garvey's Ghost TV 10-10-2023: Palestine

Rumble:

BitChute:

 

Getting to the root of the problem.

No One Is Above The Law

 

 

Hey NYS AG: Since nobody is above the law and Louis has actual evidence of fraud, When can we expect the prosecutions?

Garvey's Ghost TV 10-7-2023: Foolishness and Frauds

Rumble:

BitChute

3:00: Trump Trial Frauds
13:00: Pythago-what?
20:00: OSHA: "It Wasn't Me!"
36:39: Nobel Prize For COVID Shot
40:00: "Migrant Crisis": Follow The Money
55:00:  Commie "Camps" go Mainstream among Democrats

Tucker: Trans Inc

Ep. 28 Trans, Inc: genital mutilation is not just a fad. It’s a full-blown industry. How did something this demented happen so quickly? Chris Moritz has been following the money. pic.twitter.com/N2em2hbTE8

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) October 4, 2023

The Last Duel: Trump And Brand

 

 I like movies about "the old world". Master and Commander is one of my favourites. Another one I like is The Last Duel.

Confess!

One of the reasons I like these movies is it shows just how easy life is for both men and women relative to the past.  It's the same reason I use thoughts about US slavery as a motivator for my runs and workouts. This ain't hard. Slavery is hard. These kinds of things give one perspective. 

For those unfamiliar with the movie, the essential plot is that there is an accusation of rape. In that day rape of a woman was a property crime against her male "owner" which would be her father or husband. If that case was not resolved "judicially" then a duel would ensue between the offended parties. If the woman's defender was killed in the duel, she would be seen as a liar and burnt alive. 

Talk about incentives.

In such a society making certain accusations carried a high penalty. You couldn't call someone a rapist, in public and get away with it. Men who may consider raping a woman had to consider that they might end up dead by means of public impalement. Men involved with women had to consider that if such an accusation was made, they may have to fight to the death. Knowing this, one would have to seriously consider the morals of a potential wife. A whore wife could literally get you killed.

Today no such risks exist for men or women. But the risk is even less for women. A man who is accused of rape, which is now expansively defined, can have his reputation completely destroyed with no recourse. Even if a trial works out in his favour enough people will still consider him a rapist and that he just got lucky.

Defamation, back in the day, could get one killed via duel as well.

Women, this society is told, should be believed regardless of evidence short of video. Punishment against the accused should and will begin before a trial. And that assumes there is a trial.  Now, if a the accused denies the charge, never brought to a court of law, he can be sued for defamation. This is what happened to Trump. He was accused of sexual assault by a woman and he denied it quite vigorously. For this he was sued and the woman won. Because she was defamed as if HE was not defamed by the charge *that was never proven beyond reasonable doubt*.

In the time of The Duel, Not only would Trump be able to ultimately "fight it out" but that woman would have risked being burnt to death.  Do you honestly think she would have risked that back then?

Now we have Brand who has been accused in multiple media outlets of rape of multiple women. Unnamed as far as I know at this writing. Youtube, a Google company, well Alphabet, demonetized his videos and a UK minister actually wrote to other social media companies asking them to ban Brand as well.

Mind you, this is over accusations. Nothing founded, never charged and for events that are, to my understanding at least a decade old.  So now we are at a point where an accusation produces punishment of the accused (sometimes by the same government that would be charged with providing a fair trial!) while hiding and protecting the accuser. 

This underscores my point for a long time that one of the major reasons the US is going to shit is because there are no consequences for bad behaviors by the ruling class and women, in US society are quickly becoming a Ruling Class. Since there are no consequences to leveling false charges against people/enemies, there is no incentive to not do it. If a case is lost, they have not lost anything. Not even money since they, in government, spend taxpayer money. But lets stick with private accusations.

If the women in both Trump and Brand's case knew they were risking death if shown to be lying or at a minimum could not substantiate their claims, would they have spoken to anyone or sued?

Today we have many ways to prove a rape, in the classic sense, occurred. DNA, cameras to place the victim and assailant in the location. Potentially incriminating text messages, etc. Women who make an accusation that cannot be proven ought to face the same penalties the accused would have received. Rape claims made decades after the fact should be treated as libel and defamation against the accused unless actual evidence can be offered.

While private companies are free to do what they like, they should seriously reconsider supporting this "punish the accused" culture that has grown in the past decade. They should consider how they would like it if they were accused of some wrong doing and as a result were, say, de-listed from the stock exchange(s) and had all banking services cut off from them.  I'm pretty certain they would not care for that one bit.

Do unto others...

Why Trump Keeps Pushing The Shot

I saw someone expressing frustration that Trump keeps talking up the "vaccine" at his rallies. I had wondered the same thing for a while. After all Fauci is not popular among his "base" and neither are the mandates. Nor the lock-downs. So why even remind people of The Shot? Then I saw another comment.

"Trump is talking to Democrats and others outside the party and MAGA".

And they are absolutely correct. Trump has the Republican nomination on lock. Short of some "black swan" event. Trump is not losing the primary.  It is not unusual for the primary winner to move his or her messaging to those who may be persuadable in contested venues. Trump is just doing that earlier than is usual given the unusual circumstances he finds himself.

The reason why some anti-shot people don't get that is because, to an extent we live in a bubble. We "no shot" people are an extremely small population. 95% of the population took the shot. Many if not most of them voluntarily did it.  There is no political win to bad talk the shot to that population no matter how correct you may be. To a population that still believes these shots are effective and actually saved lives, taking credit for getting it out, quickly, is a plus.

Where Trump is vulnerable on the subject, even among the persuadable class, is the lockdown. It is clear that Trump essentially handed the power to Fauci and Birx. Reading Scott Atlas' book, makes it clear thaty Birx and Fauci had an agenda and I personally think should be executed via firing squad. But this abdication of leadership to these people highlights a major Trump weakness:

Poor staffing decisions.

Trump is too easily impressed by people, shocking given his "Apprentice" persona. Per the nature of his business he has to trust the people he delegates responsibility to. In a private business, if those people fail, at worst the business fails and that's it. When it comes to national office, that kind of fail, destroys the country. Stakes are way too high for those kinds of mistakes.

And this brings us to another problem. Lets say there is another Trump term. Who is going to staff it? After seeing what Democrats have done with the "justice system" [sic] who's willing to risk working for Trump? And if there are people with sense who would work for Trump, would he be bright enough to hire them? I honestly don't know.

Anyway, the point here is that, you (likely) and I may know that these shots are far more dangerous than COVID for the vast majority of the population, but that knowledge is not shared by much of the public. For them shots and boosters are "science" that is saving millions of lives. In that kind of environment, talking up the shots is a political winner.

Garvey's Ghost TV 9-15-2023: Learn From The Civil Rights Movement

 Rumble:

Bitchute

Discussion on human nature and how to resist the growing tyranny

We Used To Have Work When The Whites Were In Charge

 A devastating article in Der Speigel on current day South Africa.

"9910. That was the train I used to take to work every day. The last one ran six years ago," an aging Black man says in disgust as he walks past the station entrance. He adds caustically: "We used to have work when the whites were in charge, and life was better."

It’s hard to believe: A 60-year-old Black man, who was oppressed and exploited for half his life, misses the Apartheid era?

I remember when Apartheid ended. My peers and I were all "black man's time now". And how South Africa would show the world how it could be done. We were annoyed, to put it mildly about the Truth and Reconciliation committee and the entire idea of forgiving anyone who confessed.

Much later did  I come to understand WHY they were done. America had a similar outcome to it's civil war, hence the statues and names that have now been vilified and destroyed by those who know nothing but revenge and what they *think* is justice.

A few years ago when we were all deprived of our right to assemble (COVID lockdowns) I ran across many documentaries that shows just how bad a vast majority of black people have it outside of the United States. I posted a series because at the time with the dumb deification of George Floyd, so many people were talking about how "oppressed" they are. 

You don't know oppression. Most of you don't even know poverty.

Franz Fanon discussed the native "middle class" and their problems. This article is a prime example of what Fanon was discussing. This is BLM "leadership" on a national level.

The lesson here, which may come to late for America, is that this dumb "woke" leadership will destroy a modern country. NYC is finding out the hard way how symbolic "anti-racism" comes to bite you in the butt. Whereas South Africa had a revolution that put incompetent and corrupt people into power, America is voluntarily going down this road. And here's the thing, The further down the road you go, the harder it is to stop and reverse course. The more drastic the actions have to be. Most people don't have the stomach to do what needed to be done 20 years ago, what makes you think they currently have the stomach to do MORE than was required then?

David Knight Show on RICO

 

 

INTERVIEW - Dangerous Precedents of RICO Indictment

Garveys Ghost TV 9-4-2023: You Trust The System?

Rumble

BitChute

3:30: NJ COVID Lawbreaking "settlement"
19:00: FDA Sued.
27:00 Backpack Kid.
45:00: Another Federal Judge Caping for Pedos.
56:00: NY Voters Keep shafting Themselves with their Sanctuary City.

What's Mine Is Mine and What's Yours Is Mine

 This is the ideology of communists. NYC is run by communists. Yes, Eric Adams is a communist.

When you read that text you see the following:

"Hochul has faced pressure from municipal leaders, including in the political battleground in the Hudson Valley, to curb the busing of migrants into their communities."

See, NYC now reaping what they sewed when they declared itself a "Sanctuary City" where "Migrants are Welcome Here", thinks that your property, outside NYC, where you didn't do that dumb shit, is THEIR property.

"I think the governor’s wrong,” the mayor said. “She’s the governor of the state of New York. New York City is in that state.\county in this state should be part of this.”"

In other words Adams thinks it appropriate to use the force of the state to overrule the will of people NOT in NYC.

"Adams has recently urged Hochul to issue a statewide order that would bar municipalities from trying to block the arrival of migrants through local edicts.

See, these people who talk about how Orange Man is a threat to democracy openly use the state to override the democratic will of those who oppose them. The municipalities went through their legal processes  to decide to not violate federal law. Adams doesn't approve and so wants to override the "democratic process."

Don't worry, NYC residents will continue to vote for these Democrats though. Orange Man [Party] Bad.

Garvey's Ghost TV 8-28-2023: Medical Malpractice

 Rumble

BitChute

 

 7:03 New COVID Variant. "Vaccinated" Vulnerable.
19:20" ModRNA sRNA
29:00: What's This in the Pfizer Insert?
39:00 For The Want of a Vagina a Life Was Lost
50:00: Dollar Getting BRIC[ed]

Thank You Larry Elder

Larry Elder checked Charlemagne the God .🤣🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/sgcRRiRbmN

— HotepDrelly 🇺🇸 (@Drellyhotep) August 17, 2023

Election Breach! Oh Noes!

 So CNN put out an article about the GA prosecutor looking to bring a case against Trump.

Well this sounds serious. Voting System breach? That sounds really serious. I would think the average person reading that headline would think that the Trump team had breached the voting system during the election which lead to false output.

"CNN — 

Atlanta-area prosecutors investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia are in possession of text messages and emails directly connecting members of Donald Trump’s legal team to the early January 2021 voting system breach in Coffee County, sources tell CNN."

"January 2021 voting system breach". 

January. Wouldn't that be after the ballot casting was done? Why yes. Ballots were cast on Nov 3. So whatever this "breach" is, it didn't occur during the casting of ballots. It would also appear that this breach occurred after the counting. Still though, if there was a "breach" of voting systems, then we should know who did it. After all, voting systems should not be breached by unauthorized parties.

"Trump allies attempted to access voting systems after the 2020 election as part of the broader push to produce evidence that could back up the former president’s baseless claims of widespread fraud."

Interesting. So Trump's allies were trying to find (produce) evidence of voter fraud. In the process they "attempted to access voting systems". I see. So they hired a hacker or some other "black hat" group to "breach" the voting systems? Is that what we're alleging?

"Since then, new evidence has slowly been uncovered about the role of Trump’s attorneys, the operatives they hired and how the breach, as well as others like it in other key states, factored into broader plans for overturning the election."

 "Operatives they hired..." Perhaps a clandestine hacking group. This may be a serious problem.

"Together, the text messages and other court documents show how Trump lawyers and a group of hired operatives sought to access Coffee County’s voting systems in the days before January 6, 2021,"

 Lawyers and "operatives". Oh my. Trump got his lawyers to get some "operatives" to "Breach" the voting system in order to "produce evidence".  This is sounding really bad for Trump.

"Six days before pro-Trump operatives gained unauthorized access to voting systems, the local elections official who allegedly helped facilitate the breach sent a “written invitation” to attorneys working for Trump, according to text messages obtained by CNN."

Operatives gained "unauthorized access" to voting systems...had been given a "written invitation"?

"On January 1, 2021 – days ahead of the January 7 voting systems breach – Katherine Friess – an attorney working with Giuliani, Sidney Powell and other Trump allies shared a “written invitation” to examine voting systems in Coffee County with a group of Trump allies.

So there was a "written invitation' to examine voting systems in a county. 

"Investigators have scrutinized the actions of various individuals who were involved, including Misty Hampton, a former Coffee County elections official who authored the letter of invitation referenced in text messages and other documents that have been turned over to prosecutors, multiple sources told CNN."

So a county election official, Misty Hampton, wrote a "letter of invitation" to the Trump team to examine the voting systems.

If you have an invite to enter a place then you have NOT breached it. 

There is no breach.

At worst, Misty Hampton did not have the authority to write such a letter or grant permission to examine voting systems. THAT would be a charge against her, not Trump or his team.

"During that same meeting, Giuliani alluded to a plan to gain “voluntary access” to machines in Georgia, according to testimony from him and others before the House January 6 committee."

"Gain voluntary access..." 

A "breach" is not "voluntary access".
"

 She and another location elections official, Cathy Latham, allegedly helped Trump operatives gain access to the county’s voting systems, according to documents, testimony and surveillance video produced as part of a long-running civil lawsuit focused on election security in Georgia. 

Latham, who also served as a fake elector from Georgia after the 2020 election, has come under scrutiny for her role in the Coffee County breach after surveillance video showed she allowed unauthorized outsiders to spend hours examining voting systems there."

Again. If the county official invites your team to examine the voting system then you have not "breached" the voting system. There is no breach as far as this report goes. There *may* be officials who overstepped their authority. But that falls on the official, not the people they duped into believing they had the authority to do what they did.

This goes back to the Jan 6 prosecutions. When the videos came out on Tucker, I wrote about it. I mentioned that the key issue was whether the person knew they were trespassing. When the police were walking Shaman around the capitol building had they informed him that he was not authorized? These points matter. If the Trump team went to the extent of getting a "written invite" to examine the voting machines, then there is no criminal intent, and thus no crime.

The problem is that the justice system [sic] is so corrupted, that obvious stuff like this will still make it to a grand jury, a grand jury will indict (because orange man bad) and judges won't throw out these obviously fake charges and juries will convict. When the appeal finally gets it right, the defendant is drained of resources, had their reputation damaged and the people responsible will not have any accountability to deal with.

So They Weren't "Rational" After All

 A particularly devastating piece in Spiked on how so called "rational atheist" fell in line for the tranny movement.

The swiftness of the rise of the "Trans" movement caught a lot of people by surprise. Those who follow Steve Sailer would be notable exceptions.  A lot of the irrationality of the current"trans" trend can be tied to the COVID response. This is because during COVID, authority figures discovered that not only could they tell outright lies to the public without fear of consequences, they found they could leverage the power of government to enforce those lies. Social media companies volunteered themselves as enforcers of the movement silencing all dissent.

One example in this article is a note about Tyson The Clown, whom I did an entire video on:

"We’ve witnessed Neil deGrasse Tyson, America’s best-known scientist, bow to the creed of gender-as-feeling. In a TikTok video he said ‘XX/XY chromosomes are insufficient’ when it comes to reading someone’s sex, because what people feel matters along with their biology."

That commentary only solidified the point I made about Tyson. 

The other salient point made in the piece is how by embracing the tranny nonsense, The New Atheists showed that they were more interested in destroying religion (Christianity in particular) than about rationalism. This, I believe is shared with the entire LMNOP movement. They don't go to Muslim bakeries or website designers, etc. They don't go after Jewish bakeries, etc. They always go after the Christian.

I fell into that trap. I could, and can, critique Christianity all day long. I don't bother, unless asked, because it doesn't serve a purpose other than to show off what I know. My position became that if it helps you to be the best you, knock yourself out. I'm not looking for converts and I'm not approval seeking.

Ultimately the LMNOP crowd is approval seeking and they are very bad at handling rejection. Hence they have co-opted government and private businesses to wage economic warfare on those who do not approve. Again, they learned they could do this, successfully, during COVID.

So go read the piece. Well worth the time.

Imagine That....

It's called Revealed Preferences.

Garvey's Ghost TV 8-3-2023: Another Trump Indictment

Rumble:

BitChute:

 Longish review of the Trump "Jan 6" indictment. Did the DOJ open the door to it's own demise?

Garvey's Ghost TV 7-23-2023: Affirmative Nonsense

Rumble

Bitchute 

 

1:30 Brief commentary on WSOP

7:00: Speeding Tickets: The "New" Tax Revenue.

21:00: Affirmatively Dumbing Down.

28:00: Black Doctors admitting their incompetence?

43:00: Openly Admitting to Child Mutilation. Because They Can.

49:00: Muslim City Council Handles Their Business.

57:00 NYC Reaps What They Sow. It'll Get Worse.

There Will Be No Dissent

 The current so called "wokeness" of the left is often described as a religion. In the religious realm there are fast truths that come from God and anything else is rebellion against God. There is nothing to discuss because there is right and wrong. Period. The current climate around LMNOP is that it is "right" and hence unquestionable. There is no valid dissent. Witness:

Now you would think that a place that trades in "news" would be doing something called "Jounralism" where you get all sides of a story. But the LMNOP crowd says there is no other side. But above and beyond that, if you dare claim there is another side you should be fired.

What's that about power? Institutional power?

"Two news directors at a Michigan NBC affiliate were ousted on Thursday following the circulation of an internal memo calling for scaled-back coverage of Pride Month events and directing the station’s journalists to “get both sides” on LGBTQ issues, a source with knowledge of the situation told CNN."

Ousted for blasphemy against the new religion?

“We need to recognize that some stories related to LGBTQ issues are going to be controversial and polarizing in our community,” the memo sent by Fox said. “While you personally may not agree with a certain position, people are entitled to their opinions and they are our viewers.”

I suppose Stanton did not get the memo about the current religion. You are not entitled to your opinion about LMNOP. You will be told what to think about LMNOP and you will say what you are told. Silence is violence.

"The memo sparked fierce backlash from the newsroom’s staff, prompting the station’s owner, Texas-based Nexstar, to launch an investigation into the matter. "

Personally, I would have fired the lot of them but I suppose that's why I don't run things anywhere. But this decision came out of Texas?

"In a statement to CNN earlier this month, Nexstar said the email was “not consistent with Nexstar’s values, the way we cover the news, or the respect we have for our viewers” and apologized for offending members of the LGBTQ community and WOOD-TV’s viewers."

So the viewers who have positions not approved by the "news" staff are either not viewers or ARE viewers but not deserving of "respect" if that "respect" offends the LMNOP. And say, what are those "values?

Like I said about the NAACP, someone needs to ask them exactly what their values are. Do they approve of child grooming? Do they approve of sexual behaviour in front of children? Do they approve of child mutilation. No way no how should these corporations be let off the hook when they talk about "their values" in reference to LMNOP.

"On Thursday, Gary Weitman, a Nexstar spokesperson, confirmed to CNN that the company had made changes to WOOD-TV’s newsroom leadership team to “ensure its ability to continue providing outstanding local news coverage and service to the Grand Rapids community and surrounding area.”"

So this company, based in Texas, made changes to the leadership team of Lansing MICHIGAN, to better reflect it's "Texas values"?

Interesting indeed.

There will be no dissent to the new overlords. They learned from COVID that they can fire people at will with no fear.

Garvey's Ghost TV 6-30-2023: 303 Creative Decision

Rumble:

 Bitchute:

 Discussion of the. 303 Creative decision. Why I believe it's a 13th Amendment issue.

More Ramifications of CBDC

 Nigel Faraj has had his bank account closed. Below he discusses it. The most important part he brings up is how in the modern system not having a bank account makes one a non-person. Even in remote parts of Africa, people use cell phones to transact business. You really need to understand this threat. You may be 'safe" today but the line(s) are always moving. 

Garvey's Ghost TV 6-26-23: I Tried To Warn Y'all

Rumble:

Bitchute:

More Alphabet Mafia laying the legal foundations.

3:30: Wokeness will get you killed. But You'll be inspired.
8:00: I Warned You. Laying The Legal Foundations. Florida and NJ
30:11: A plea to sane Democrats.
34:00: Scientists shook by dissenters having a voice.
43:00: Historical Boycotts and Why The Bud Light situation could turn out badly for conservatives.

An Example of Why CBDC Is Going To Be Really Bad

 I spoke about CBDC before. I discussed how it would be programmable and be able to deny you access to all kinds of things that the "bank" decides you shouldn't have for whatever reason.

Louis Rossmann has a nice example of what to expect:

This is just Amazon but think about it. Those smart meters connected to your house. Flick of a switch and you have no power. No need to send a worker to the property. Banks closing accounts,. Credit cards declined. Expiring money. 

Because you had the wrong opinion. 

And lets be clear, I don't care IF that guy's door camera DID say something racist. That isn't grounds to disable the property they paid for. 

Oh right, paid for no longer means "owns".

Personally I think Amazon should be sued for this. Of course it would cost an arm and a leg, which is exactly what they want and depend upon. Most people would be bankrupt before the very first court appearance.

The "Trans" Insurance Fraud Racket

 Matt Walsh names the names

"4/ Groner explains that insurance companies won't pay for these surgeries unless the patient is diagnosed with gender dysphoria. So, she says healthcare workers should provide the diagnosis. “We're using that diagnosis,” she says, “to ensure clients get that necessary treatment.""

Now you understand why the Florida judge I discussed in the last GGTV video needed to uphold this nonsense. 

Garvey's Ghost TV 6-6-2023: The Growing Nonsense

 Rumble:

Bitchute:

2:52: The NAACP is a Fraud
15:00: Sea Rise or Land Sink
21:00: Nice School You Got There.
36:00: Vaccine Induced Mycarditis More Confirmation.
43:00: Florida Judge Tries To Set Tranny Precedent

Tulsi Gabbard on The MIC

The warmongers are trying to drag us into WW3, which can only end in one way: nuclear annihilation and the suffering and death of all our loved ones. Zelensky, Biden, NATO, congressional and media neocons are insane. And we are insane if we passively allow them to lead us into… pic.twitter.com/aUEdPFAzoy

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) May 21, 2023

I've long said that Tulsi is one of the (if not the only) sane Democrat out there. She has left the Democratic party because she has recognized that they have gone crazy. I was disappointed when she didn't come down against the Trump impeachment because she had doubts. I was disappointed because:

1) In the American system, all doubt goes in favor of the accused.

2) If you want to be POTUS you have to make a decision. You don't get to sit it out. Anyway, great clip above.,

Mutilate Child, Go To Jail

 My man.

DESANTIS: “If you’re taking off the private parts of some 15-year-old kid, you should go to jail.” pic.twitter.com/l0BvcoekqW

— DeSantis War Room 🐊 (@DeSantisWarRoom) May 19, 2023

 

If this is "sanctimonious" well call me sanctimonious.

Justice Neil Gorsuch Says What Needs To Be Said

 Some of you all may be wondering why I never sued my former employer over my firing over the Trump shot. The reason was that I saw that the courts were in on the blatant disregard of the law and if they were to find in my favor they would also be indicting themselves. This is because they too had imposed such burdens on their employees. Ye olde t"wo wolves and a sheep debate what's for dinner" situation.

 With that said let's look at what Gorsuch has said

:

"the Court took a serious misstep when it effectively allowed nonparties to this case to manip- ulate our docket to prolong an emergency decree designed for one crisis in order to address an entirely different one."

 The nice thing here is that Gorsuch discusses the abuse of emergency decrees.

Since March 2020, we may have experienced the greatest intrusions on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country. Executive officials across the country issued emer- gency decrees on a breathtaking scale. Governors and local leaders imposed lockdown orders forcing people to remain in their homes.13 They shuttered businesses and schools, public and private.14 They closed churches even as they al- lowed casinos and other favored businesses to carry on.15 They threatened violators not just with civil penalties but with criminal sanctions too.1

 I noted the way the states acted to criminalize things like walking down the street and not wearing a face diaper. It was quite revealing to see so called "black leaders' like Ras Baraka and Eric Adams have black people arrested for "being outside" and supporting medical segregation.

Federal executive officials entered the act too. Not just with emergency immigration decrees. They deployed a public-health agency to regulate landlord-tenant relations nationwide.19 They used a workplace-safety agency to issue a vaccination mandate for most working Americans.20

An absolute abuse of power as well as a usurpation of power that had no constitutional basis.

"Along the way, it seems federal officials may have pressured social-media companies to suppress information about pandemic policies with which they disagreed.23"

I know all about that. I stopped posting to YouTube for this very reason.

"Courts bound to protect our liberties addressed a few—but hardly all—of the intrusions upon them. In some cases, like this one, courts even allowed themselves to be used to perpetuate emergency public-health decrees for collateral purposes, itself a form of emergency-lawmaking- by-litigation."

Like I said in the opening.

Garvey's Ghost TV 5-17-2023: The Durham Report

 Rumble:

Bitchute:

Not So Sanctuary

I thought that “sanctuary city” was a moral and financial good. For years Democrats have boldly stated that “immigrants are welcome here” as they declared places they run as “sanctuary cities” and ‘Sanctuary states”. This reference echos back to fugitive slave laws of the past (and perhaps things like the underground railroad) where those fleeing the persecution of the law could be sheltered by those who opposed those laws. As usual this emotional blackmail covers the fact that the two eras and circumstances are nothing alike.

Most of us who have a clue object to the ideas that the government should be:

1) Undermining the immigration law passed by the duly elected representatives on the country.
2) Using the taxes raised [by force] off of citizens that should be going to the benefit of said citizens, on persons who should not even be in the country.

The Dems response to that is:

You’re a racist for saying that.

I’m sure Barbara Jordan would agree.

So long as illegal aliens were invading southern states, mostly northern states, and their urban mayors could not resist painting the leadership in those locations, so long as they were Republicans, as racist, white supremacists for opposing said invasion. They went so far as to misrepresent border patrol agents on horseback as literal “crackers” in their successful attempt to oust Trump from the White House. Now that the border states and Florida, have sent the illegal aliens to various blue states, the Democrats running those places are singing a brand new tune.

“Officials representing some New York suburbs have rebuked New York City Mayor Eric Adams' plan to send migrants to their towns for shelter.”

Wait. NYC is a sanctuary city. Why would Eric [Bull Connor] Adams be sending “migrants” to places that are NOT NYC?

““The City declared itself a Sanctuary City in December of 2016 committing itself to supporting undocumented individuals “

That declaration had the following title:

"Resolution affirming that despite president-elect Donald Trump's senseless threats, New York City will remain a Sanctuary City for immigrant residents."

So the entire premise of the “sanctuary city” was to spite Trump.

Orange Man Bad.

I said at the time that when Trump got into office, one of his highest priorities should have been prosecuting each and every city, including the officials, who declared themselves sanctuary cities. It is a federal crime to aide and abet illegal aliens to enter or stay in the country. That includes providing the means to stay in the country.

1907. TITLE 8, U.S.C. 1324(A) OFFENSES

“Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).”

and

“Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.”

So by openly declaring “sanctuary cities” these jurisdictions admitted to breaking federal law and since it was a group of them then it is a corrupt organization and RICO charges should be applied.
Of course Trump was (and is) all bark and no bite on these things failed to do this. Sessions thought it better to spend his time defending confiscation of peoples money (and other properties) for crimes they had not been charged with, much less convicted of. 

In the case of NY, the people who declared their intention to break federal law, put their names to the documented conspiracy:

Melissa Mark-Viverito, Brad S. Lander, Carlos Menchaca, Ben Kallos, Laurie A. Cumbo, Antonio Reynoso, Stephen T. Levin, Jumaane D. Williams, Rafael L. Espinal, Jr., Helen K. Rosenthal, Julissa Ferreras-Copeland, Margaret S. Chin, Rory I. Lancman, Deborah L. Rose, I. Daneek Miller, Ydanis A. Rodriguez, Mark Levine, Mark Treyger, Daniel R. Garodnick, Rosie Mendez, Costa G. Constantinides, Peter A. Koo

So it’s not like they had to figure out who was in on it. They told on themselves. But that’s not the point of this post.

“On Friday, Adams announced he was sending migrants to neighboring New York counties in response to the rising numbers of asylum seekers arriving in the city, which is reportedly overwhelming the city's shelter system.”

“Overwhelming the city’s shelter system”? I wonder if any of the geniuses that made that resolution had considered this. I suppose not because they, far away from a border that doesn’t require an airport to get to, didn’t think they would actually have to act on this. See JFK and LaGuardia airport are borders and only so many people can afford to fly in and then overstay their visa. So it acts as a kind of control. But busses arriving from the south? Ain’t no passport check at the GWB, Lincoln or Holland tunnels.

““Despite calling on the federal government for a national decompression strategy since last year, and for a decompression strategy across the state, New York City has been left without the necessary support to manage this crisis,"”

Now they want a strategy? I thought that was racist. Also, when they made that dumb resolution didn’t anyone consider, you know, costs? More traffic cams to tax drivers I suppose.

““It is clear that the immigration crisis created by the federal government has negatively impacted Orange County,” Orange County executive Steven Neuhaus and Town of Newburgh supervisor Gil Piaquadio said in a statement. "It is a self-induced problem created by lack of planning and continues to burden our taxpayers."”

Oh it’s not “lack of planning.” Trust.

“"The Rockland County executive has sadly already shown he is not a leader this state needs," Levy said. "Instead, we’ve been met with racist rhetoric and reprehensible threats from the head of a county that will be tasked with caring for less than one-fourth of 1% of the asylum seekers who have come to New York City, and, once again, New York would be paying for shelter, food, and services.””

“Racist rhetoric.”

Of course.

That’s all they have. Do as we say or you’re racist.