Saturday, May 21, 2016

Real Fascism and Definition Creep

Did this Google search on the word "fascism" just now and got the following top definition:
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.
You'll note that this definition states that fascism is definitively "right wing".

Now when we get an actual authoritative definition of fascism we find:

a way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a dictator controls the lives of the people and in which people are not allowed to disagree with the government : very harsh control or authority
This is the definition I grew up with. It was clear then as it is now that a fascist system is not definitively "right wing". This "right wing" aspect is an example of definition creep. In this case it is a means by which leftists (who run Google, Wikipedia, Twitter and Facebook, the primary places where a large number of impressionable persons get their 'operating definitions" of things, seek to redefine terms to obscure their own behavior. Full definition of fascism by same authority:
often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
Lefty types zoom in on "nation" and "race" as the boogymen in the definition. Yet they do not "see" the bad in the "what they do" part of the definition: "centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader" and 'severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition" President Obama and his Justice [sic] Department has shown us the fascist nature of the sitting regime and indeed of the traitor filled Democratic Party.

The president sends out a "directive" telling schools what a female or male is in direct contradiction to science. The Justice [sic] Department threatens to punish those states and persons who do not act in accordance to such decrees and threatens economic sanctions. Businesses fall in line and also effect economic damages on those states and persons who object (dissent) from the dictates of the administration.

How exactly is this NOT fascism? Because they don't say "America First"?

Facebook openly works with the German (and who know who else) government in order to suppress speech that Merkel et-al do not approve of. If Facebook and it's American citizen and resident Mark Zuckerberg were actually interested in democracy and government by the consent of the people not only would he have refused to do such work on the behalf of Germany but he would also not approve of the following:

The admin of Disdain for Plebs, a pro-Trump, alt-right Facebook page, was banned for arguing that Trump was not anti-Muslim, but anti-ISIS, and that his proposed ban on Muslims was not due to innate racism, but because “Homeland Security cannot differentiate which Muslim is radical wanting to cause harm and which is a harmless refugee.”

Facebook moderators, however, apparently considered this to be wrongthink. The post was subsequently removed, as can be seen below, and the account suspended.

When peaking factually becomes a banning offense which is supported by those seeking high and low office you no longer have a functioning democratic republic. If we are not living in a democratic republic then what exactly are we living in?

Thursday, May 19, 2016

Isn't This Racist?

*Note: Something has changed with Blogger that is messing up my embeds. If you can't see the video inline please click on the linked text

So I come home and see this on the TV:

Isn't this racist? All those black teens. Nary a white face in the mix. Well no, white faces as administrators. So what are they telling us here? And isn't it supposed to be racist to point out what this video is pointing out?

BROWNSVILLE, Brooklyn (WABC) -- A new program is giving students a serious reality check when it comes to gun violence.

The program is called "It Starts Here" and involves middle school and high school students visiting a hospital to hear from victims of gun violence, and it also includes a visit to the morgue.

Brownsville demographics:

"You guys have a decision to make," Edwards told the group. "You can make a decision to do great things, or you can make a decision to go the wrong way. And usually, wrong ways end you up here."
Hmmm...most communities don't need to send their kids to morgues to learn this lesson.

Sunday, May 15, 2016

Austin Indiana Vs. Jackson, MS

So The Atlantic has an article discussing the HIV ravaged town of Austin Indiana.
In January 1990, unemployment spiked to a high of 16.9 per cent. The average jobless rate for that year was lower, at 8.5 per cent, but still starkly at odds with an overall U.S. unemployment rate of 5.6 per cent. The town’s infrastructure began to deteriorate. Jackie McClintock, a nurse who works with Combs, points to the lack of recreational activities as leading people to use drugs. “There’s nothing for people to do,” she said. “There’s boredom, unemployment.” Jerome Adams, Indiana’s state health commissioner, describes Austin as having social and economic conditions that are ideal for a drug epidemic. “It’s kind of the epitome of years of neglect, poverty, lack of education, and lack of opportunity, or people’s perception of lack of opportunity,” he said.

Today, the estimated median household income in Austin is $33,000, about $15,000 less than that for Indiana. The average home is valued at $78,000, the U.S. median in 2010 being $210,000. About 8.3 percent of Austin residents are unemployed, compared with a U.S. average of 5 percent. An estimated 34 percent of working people in Austin hold manufacturing jobs and just 7 percent have a college degree. In 2013, about 25 percent of Austin residents were living in poverty.

You'll notice there is nothing said about the racial composition of Austin. Well it's 96% White. Why do I bring this up? Because there is a long running assertion that poverty and drug use is the reason for the high levels of gun involved crimes (shootings and murders) in Black communities. Hence the first thing I wanted to know was, what is the murder rate in Austin? Well basically zero.

If poverty and drugs and lack of employment opportunities are the reason for high levels of gun related homicides then we should be seeing a steady stream of murders in Austin. Meanwhile in Jackson Mississippi:

You'll note that Jackson MS has a similar demographic profile (except for size of population) as Austin:

Estimated median household income in 2013: $29,811 (it was $30,414 in 2000)
Jackson: $29,811
MS: $37,963
Estimated per capita income in 2013: $17,434 (it was $17,116 in 2000)

Jackson city income, earnings, and wages data

Estimated median house or condo value in 2013: $84,000 (it was $64,200 in 2000)
Jackson: $84,000
MS: $97,500
Mean prices in 2013: All housing units: $124,736; Detached houses: $124,238; Townhouses or other attached units: $98,704; In 2-unit structures: $30,442; In 3-to-4-unit structures: $105,809; In 5-or-more-unit structures: $202,304; Mobile homes: $179,426 Median gross rent in 2013: $720.

The major difference aside from total population? Jackson MS is 80% black.

This provides more evidence for the data that whites generally use guns on themselves (suicide) while blacks use gun on each other (genocide).

Fear Is A Choice

The only part of After Earth you need to watch:

"Proper" Child Rearing

Certainly the fault of white people everywhere and anytime.

Alternate link in case video doesn't load:

Friday, May 13, 2016

Motivational Speaker

One point here. He was talking about how blacks survived slavery and therefore should be able to do well on a test. I cannot agree. If anything, the fact that we got enslaved and participated in our enslavement shows that we had already failed the relevant tests. But to bring it to education, survival is not a sign of intelligence. A single cell organism can "survive" a harsh environment. Clearly it has no brain. Survival comes from instinct. Doing well in an advanced society often requires suppressing instincts.

Now personally, I use slavery as a means of inspiration for physical activity. I run that race at that pace 'cause it's not hard to run 13 miles when my people were out in the hot fields from can't see to can't see.

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Justice [sic] Department Goes Full Orwell

Those of us who are very aware felt the "disturbance in the force" when we heard or read the AG announce it's lawsuit against the state of North Carolina. It was unfortunate, though probably inevitable that it would be a black woman who would stand up and take a sledge hammer to truth, facts and constitutional principle in one go. Before I quote let me remind the reader what this entire process is really about. This is not about bathrooms. This is about recognizing a class of people who are, in fact, mentally ill (gender dysphoria) or who simply enjoy annoying the fuck out of other people. It is providing Civil Rights not based on "deeply held values" like religion or immutable human characterists such as race or sex. It is the ultimate "cannot say no" disease (or shall I say policy) that is being applied to the majority population.
Now, the North Carolina General Assembly passed House Bill 2 in special session on March 13 of this year. The bill sought to strike down an anti-discrimination provision in a recently passed Charlotte, North Carolina, ordinance, as well as to require transgender people in public agencies to use the bathrooms consistent with their sex as noted at birth, rather than the bathrooms that fit their gender identity. [my underlines]
This "conflict" between sex "as noted at birth" and 'gender identity" exists solely because the left has had 50 odd years to create this "legal fiction" of gender. It successfully infiltrated the language because most people, like myself up to a few years ago, assumed and therefore used, gender and sex interchangebly. We thought that "gender" was a polite or "genteel" way of saying sex, much in the way that many parents avoid saying "sex" in front of their children. We had no idea that we were being primed to mentally accept a concept of self that was divorced from one's genetic code or body as it naturally developed.

Once this new word (new speak) gained normalcy the next level was thrown down. This is where we have people referred to as "cis" this or that. The "cis" being borrowed from Chemistry where a compound may have the same chemical makeup but "present" physically different.

But the important thing here is that for thousands of years and hundreds in the case of the US, there has never been a need to have this discussion in legal terms because the common culture was clear about the acceptability of transsexualism in the public square. It was not that such men and women did not exist, they simply knew better than to attempt certain public things. However; as the common culture has been under withering attack over the past 50-60 years, the left has taken off the mask and gone for broke.

The bill was signed into law that same day, and in so doing, the legislature and the governor placed North Carolina in direct opposition to federal laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex and gender identity.
There are no federal laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender identity. Lynch knows this. There is federal laws against discrimination based on sex but transexuals are not being "discriminated against" based on their sex as the legislation does not pick on a tranny of only one actual sex. And that all assumes the law is "discrimination" at all. I don't even consider it "discriminatory" as no one is being denied access to any and all bathrooms. If a tranny feels so offput by a state agency or a private entity saying that he or she has to use the appropriate bathroom that they don't go to any bathroom, that is their choice. They better wear some Depends though.

Tranny's who think they are men and who dress in "male" clothes and perhaps draw on some facial hair are free to enter any female bathroom and "take a seat". Similarly Tranny's who feel themselves to be women are free to dress in their "freakum dress" and paint up their face and enter the men's bathroom and assume the position at a urinal. They are free to do this like every other biological male and female in the United States. How is it discrimination?

It is "discrimination" in the eyes of the Justice [sic] Department because they are now in the business of protecting "feelz". The left believes that there is some constitutional rights to "good feelz" (for them of course) and have been pursuing these policies like a rabid dog for the past couple of years. It is not surprising given that this is the result of a generation (and their parents) who have obsessed over the "feelz" of their children. Prizes of losing. Against spanking, etc.


More to the point, they created state-sponsored discrimination against transgender individuals, who simply seek to engage in the most private of functions in a place of safety and security, a right taken for granted by most of us.
As demonstrated above it does no such thing. It merely bars the mentally ill from imposing their mentally ill actions on the majority of the population that wants no part of it.

I'm going to skip over a few paragraphs so as to get to the Big Point"

And what we must not do, what we must never do is turn on our neighbors, our family members, our fellow Americans for something that they cannot control and deny what makes them human.

And this is why none of us can stand by when a state enters the business of legislating identity and insists that a person pretend to be something or someone that they are not or invents a problem that does not exist as a pretext for discrimination and harassment. [My underlines]

Up is down. Left is right. Right is wrong. Persons who suffer from gender dysphoria are the only persons involved here who are "pretending to be something or someone they are not". It is not the state that is legislating identity. Lynch has put the cart before the horse and the driver is facing the wrong way. It is the state of North Carolina that is recognizing the actual identities of those persons suffering from gender dysphoria and deciding it will not play along (actually as of now they are ducking under the cover of "protected class"). That nobody in the conference, as far as I know, pointed this simple fact shows how far the rot has gotten. The Extortion/Theft Racket Now that the federal government has amassed so much power over the states, it is now able to strangle these states by extorting the taxes they remit to the federal government and stealing their tax monies to use as leverage against the states.
We are seeking a court order declaring HB-2’s restroom restriction impermissibly discriminatory, as well as a statewide bar on its enforcement. Now, while the lawsuit currently seeks declaratory relief, I want to note that we retain the option of curtailing federal funding to the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and the University of North Carolina as this case proceeds.
Assuming such an action is in fact a part of legislation that created this agency (or the agency doing the actual withholding), it shows the tyranny of good intentions. I'm almost certain that no legislator at the time of the passage of the legislation thought that it would be used in such a manner. These threats of withholding "federal money" as if it was created by the federal government as it's own property to dispense with however it wishes is something that should be addressed by Congress. The federal government gets it's money via taxes on the people. The purpose of those taxes is to carry out the function of government. I don't think it was every thought that the federal government could, after taking the taxpayer's money, refuse to deliver the services that it is obligated to render/

I was under the impression that it was congress that determined what and where money got spent by the federal government. This could be yet another example of the congress abdicating it's responsibility to some agency(ies) with disastrous consequences.

This is what it has come to. Using (and staining) the legacy of black struggle for their civil rights due them as natural citizens. Not as people who take drugs to stop/delay puberty. Not as people who have "medical procedures" to remove perfectly functional body parts. Not as people who take drugs and hormones for the rest of their (usually) short lives with many ill effects. I reject any and all associations of the struggles of black folk with the mental issues of an extremely small (less than 1%) proportion of the population.

The US government has gone full Orwell and it is using extortion tactics on a population it has carefully made dependent upon it to implement and enforce it's new rules.

Monday, May 09, 2016

You Thought I Was Being Alarmist

So there are folks who think my recent postings are "alarmist". I'm afraid those persons are sadly mistaken as to the nature of the beast that has bared the entirety of it's fangs. Moonbattery brings us a case from Canada:
Though the case is about whether the 11-year-old can give informed consent to such serious medical treatment, which is intended to delay the onset of female puberty, the judge appears to have already conceded the point by referring to the girl by her preferred, male, initials, J.K., and accepting her male self-identification.

In his ruling, Mr. Justice Ronald Skolrood declared that, “This case is really about J.K. and his [sic] role in determining his [sic] own future. In my view, these issues cannot be properly considered without J.K.’s direct participation.”

Understand the extent of this judges ruling. He has stated, as fact that a girl is a boy. This betrays basic scientific fact and principles that ought guide a court. Secondly the court and therefore the state approves a minor being given drugs to stop a normal bodily function that is in no way, shape or form diseased. This is child abuse on the Nth level. Original article here:

Sunday, May 08, 2016

Treason as National Policy?

John Kerry speaking to graduates of Northeastern University.
Kerry also seemed to dismiss the importance of national borders, and said technology has reshaped the world into one that the U.S. must engage at the risk of being left behind. He said Trump and others who want to look inward are making a mistake, even in the face of rising tension and violence in the world...

"The future demands from us something more than a nostalgia for some rose-tinted version of the past that did not really exist in any case," he said. "You're about to graduate into a complex and borderless world."

What Kerry is saying is that the future of the US is no US. He is predicting and embracing the destruction of the sovereign entity known as the US. How that is not treason, I don't know. If Kerry is so good with "no borders" then he should move to North Korea. Not only that, the US should remove itself from the border between North and South Korea. Because, you know, borders aren't important and the way of the past. Matter of fact, why even have a presidential election this year. There is no need for a president when there are no countries and with no borders anyone's law is everyone's law. Why not just submit to rule of the UN and the 'security council" which, since borders don't matter, won't be made up of countries (since those are defined by borders) but by "interested parties".

And that's what this comes down to ennit? Certain "Interested parties" should be determining what the world population should be doing, thinking and saying and those things are all for the benefit of the "interested parties". The mask has fallen off the elite (both left and right). They are openly acting to break the countries for which they have been given rulership over. They have mastered the ability to manipulate the emotions of a large portion of their populations to respond to crises in far flung locations that they, the elites created. The citizenry is so programmed that they will sell out their progeny and fellow citizens to ease the unjustified and created feelings of [racial] guilt.

Those states that gave rise to concepts of free speech are now at the forefront of prosecuting speech against or critical of persons who are not natives of their land or citizens of their soon to be abolished countries. This is treason. It is treason embedded into the national policies of various countries. The boldness with which these policies are spoken and acted upon shows that the "interested parties" are very confident in their control over the national parties of the various soon to be done in nations. What couldn't be done via warfare is being done in congresses, parliaments, general assemblies and executive suites and funded by taxes and consumer spending.

Kerry can talk about tinted roses past because he knows that the people he is speaking to doesn't even know a world where single parenting was virtually non existent. Where divorce was extremely rare. Where salaries for non-credentialed individuals could support a family of 4 and have money to spare. Since they have no personal knowledge of these things they can be fed a narrative that says it didn't exist or was so flawed as to be a net negative. Seems that the "interested parties", at least in the US, have figured that enough of the older population has died off and enough "new voters" have been imported such that they can openly talk their plans and implement policies that would have gotten them "in trouble" even 20 years ago.