Garvey's Ghost TV: 12-31-2021 Commentary Gumbo

 Live at 8PM EST

Last stream of the year. I discuss some "odd" COVID cases, child stalkers in schools. More Public Emergency Abuse, Commentary on Matrix and First episode of Book Of Boba Fett (Spoilers)

Garveys Ghost TV 12-29-2021: The Great Reversal

 Livestream 8PM

 

 

Computing Forever on The Conspiracy

 This guy has been spot on from the jump. I've linked to his stuff before but I think this latest piece is good way to look back at 2021 and seeing it for what it is:

RIP Desmond Tutu

Still being in an altered state of mind due to my current condition, I think the passing of Tutu didn't hit me as it would have had things been "normal". Not to say that his passing is insignificant. I was very much into the situation in South Africa and more of a Steve Biko  and Pan-African Congress fan than an ANC fan. Being youthful I gravitated to the whole "spear of the nation" rhetoric. 

There will be those who disapprove, I'm not looking for approval. My position has long been that if you don't get angry, possibly "wish them all dead" (in reference to the white South African nationals) angry at the plight of black folks in that country at that time, I'd think you don't really care.

Fast forward to after the end of Apartheid and the whole Truth and Justics commission. Honestly I thought it was a cop out. You let people get off so long as they confess to whatever it is they did? On both sides?

How do you do that? How do you judge the actions of those fighting FOR liberation in the same light as those who fight for oppression? Even today I struggle with that. However; for Tutu this was about univeral law. Universal humanity and that those principles should guide every and any side. Honestly I think something else motivated that.

Like others at the time I couldn't understand why there wasn't a "clean sweep" of the SA government and an aggressive land reclamation endeavor a-la-Zimbabwe. I couldn't understand it because I was, like many others entirely ignorant of the situation.

I saw a documentary about Mandela's prison time which featured interviews with other political prisoners and it was then that I understood. Mandela and his comrades came to understand that they could not "kill de-white people" and still have one of the most advanced countries on the continent. The natives had, by and large none of the expertise needed to run such a franchise. Hence the desire for revenge and other feelings that were well studied by Frantz Fanno that could lead to national collapse had to be avoided.

This is what I think that commission was meant to do. I think it worked to a great extent though only a fool would not recognize the killing of white South African farmers as racial revenge. To see how badly that can end up, simply look north to Zimbabwe which would very much like a return of their white farmers.

So in a sense Tutu helped to avoid a violent racial purge in South Africa. Again, not to say everything is a crystal stair. I'm older and wiser now. The fires of revenge doused by discernment, something Tutu had and implemented. 

Thank you Tutu for your service however imperfect.

Garvey's Ghost TV: 12-23-2021: The SARS Boat 8PM

 

Live 8PM

I Am Number 4

 Unfortunately, not the movie (though depending, it may be fortunately)

I'm gonna ask the question again:

When will it be enough for you folks who took the first set?

Do you "unboosted" people not see that you too are soon to join, if you aren't already in, The Unvaccinated?

Do you see that it doesn't end? Are not angry that the promises they made are completely absent?

R U DUN Yet?

I saw people online coping with the whole "well some vaccines have schedules you know"

Yeah,  four shots in one year schedules?

Stop coping. Stop being in denial. Wake up.  Now is the time.

They Hate You

 Yesterday I found out about a family member who was having extended family visit for the holidays. I was told there was a conflict about "who could come". Being the naive person I usually am, I figured this was about certain family members not getting along. No. The actual situation is that certain members have taken one of the shots and others have not and, of course, the shot takers are the ones making the fuss, dictating that the "not jabbed" not attend.

Now me personally, my position is that it is MY house and therefore I decide who may or may not enter, not the guests. I personally would have dis invited anyone who thought THEY had that right.  

They are not the only people with this issue. Families across the world are going through this. In my opinion these people are revealing themselves for who and what they are. They are the people who would have balked at sitting next to a Negro on the bus. They would have been offended by a Negro being in the same bathroom as them. They would have been the people defending slavery and the like. They are the type who would not have batted an eye as Jews were put into ghettos, placed on trains and put into ovens.

The point is that the pandemic has revealed a lot of people for exactly WHAT they are. The culture has moved enough so that they can actually BE who they are without the fear of consequences. They can count on the "authorities" to have their backs. They relish in being the New Master Race.

I saw a post by Jessie Kelly (I believe) where he was pointing out how these politicians and un-elected "public health officials" publicly speak to citizens with unmasked condescension. I remember driving down the NJ Turnpike and seeing the "knocklehead" signage on the traffic boards and I was like, WHO do THEY think they are talking to like that? That is not how a public SERVANT addresses those they SERVE.

As I pointed out in my livestream on Saturday, these people no longer think the government exists to serve the people, they think it is the other way around and they are doing everything they can to make that the "new normal".

During the 2016 election campaign, Hillary Clinton let her mask slip off when she called Trump supporters a "basket of deplorables".  I didn't recognize it at the time, but this was the emergent "eliminationist" language of the new DNC. Many of us, including me, thought this was a Clinton thing but as we have seen, this is a far larger phenomenon. Witness an official WH communication:

First. Omicron is not doing anything. Any disruption to work and school is due to the government and employers. Full stop. 

Second notice the "two tier" society. They are working for the "vaccinated" and the rest of you can FOAD.

Thirdly, the "winter of severe illness" is factually incorrect. We already know that the vast majority of infections are asymptomatic or mild (cold like) symptoms. And by "vast majority" we mean 90+%. We also know that severe cases are largely (again 90+%) among those with specific comorbidities related to metabolic syndrome (obesity, diabetes).

But imagine the level of contempt required to write such a release. I have said many times this year: 

These people are malicious.

Garvey's Ghost TV 12-18-2021: The USSA: Reviewing the 6th Circuit Decision Live at 8PM EST

 8PM EST.

And Now France

 

"PARIS, Dec 17 (Reuters) - France will from next month reduce the time between second and third COVID-19 vaccination injections to four months and require people to show proof of vaccination to enter some venues, Prime Minister Jean Castex said on Friday."-Reuters

So now the French are under a "shot every 4 months" rule to do things that up to March of 2020 were common and normal activities.

Related:

"Prime Minister Jean Castex said on Friday the government will propose a bill in parliament in January to change France's "health pass" into a "vaccine pass", meaning only vaccinated people will be allowed to enter indoor public places such as bars, restaurants and cinemas. read more"

 

The 6th Circuit Lifts The Stay

 Read it here:

https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/21a0287p-06.pdf

We. Are. F****

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree that the government’s motion to dissolve
the stay should be granted and concur fully in Judge Stranch’s opinion. I write separately to note
the limited role of the judiciary in this dispute about pandemic policy. Petitioners and various
opinions discuss at length how OSHA could have handled the pandemic’s impact on places of
employment differently. Some of the writings include sweeping pronouncements about
constitutional law and the scope of OSHA’s statutory authority. Much of this writing is
untethered from the specific facts and issues presented here and overlooks the limited nature of
our role.

 

Reasonable minds may disagree on OSHA’s approach to the pandemic, but we do not
substitute our judgment for that of OSHA, which has been tasked by Congress with policy-
making responsibilities. See Charles D. Bonnano Linen Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 454 U.S. 404, 418
(1982). This limitation is constitutionally mandated, separating our branch from our political co-
branches. “[F]ederal judges—who have no constituency—have a duty to respect legitimate
policy choices made by those who do.” Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 866
(1984). Beyond constitutional limitations, the work of an agency, often scientific and technical
in nature, is outside our expertise. See Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400, 2413 (2019).
Our only responsibility is to determine whether OSHA has likely acted within the bounds
of its statutory authority and the Constitution. As it likely has done so, I concur."

 

And

 

By contrast, the costs of delaying implementation of the ETS are comparatively high.
Fundamentally, the ETS is an important step in curtailing the transmission of a deadly virus that
has killed over 800,000 people in the United States, brought our healthcare system to its knees,
forced businesses to shut down for months on end, and cost hundreds of thousands of workers
their jobs. In a conservative estimate, OSHA finds that the ETS will “save over 6,500 worker
lives and prevent over 250,000 hospitalizations” in just six months. 86 Fed. Reg. 61,402,
61,408. A stay would risk compromising these numbers, indisputably a significant injury to the
public. The harm to the Government and the public interest outweighs any irreparable injury to
the individual Petitioners who may be subject to a vaccination policy, particularly here where
Petitioners have not shown a likelihood of success on the merits. See Coleman v. Paccar, Inc.,

Never mind that the above paragraph says NOTHING about workplace safety, which is what OSHA is about. Never mind that none of the "vaccines" actually prevent infection or transmission. 

And never mind that per the constitution the individual holds the rights over their persons and property as enumerated in the 4th Amendment, not the "government"  or "public".

I have zero confidence that SCOTUS will do any different. And that assumes they even take the case.

As I said months ago, this will be the end of the US as it has been known. The ideology has been thoroughly implanted.

NYS Soars Past Prior Casedemic Highs

 Perusing Worldometers as I am wont to do from time to time, I decided to look at the current numbers in NYS.

NYS has blown by it's peak rates from both March-May 2020 as well as meeting it's Nov-Jan peak. 

The most cases can be seen in NYC.

 Note that NYC has it's mask mandate and it's "vaccine passport" system as well as many companies (including hospitals) requiring "vaccines" for employment.

Any sane place would see that these measures meant nothing in regards to cases and immediately cease and desist but we are not in sane times.

The good news is that while case rates are high, the death rates have not followed and remain quite low. Last January's peak was far lower than the March 2020 Cuomo fiasco and I expect this one to be equal to or lesser than the one seen in Jan 2020. Why? Partially due to better care. I would think a lot of people have gotten the message that early treatment is important. Better serious care (keeping people off vents), The reaping effect of the last two waves and the therapeutic effects of the current "vaccines' on people who would otherwise have tipped over. Those already predisposed to no or mild symptoms, which is most of the cases would not by dying regardless of "shot" status.

Garvey's Ghost TV 12-16-2021: Pharma Fears Liability, CDC On J&J, Closur...

8PM

 

*Removed by YouTube for "medical misinformation". 

Garvey's Ghost Live Stream 8PM

 The Ghost will likely have a YouTube livestream up tonight. Bringing back Garvey's Ghost TV live style.  Assuming I get all the kinks worked out. 8PM

I Tried To Warn Y'all

 

Where I work(ed), I told my coworkers that it won't stop at 2 shots. A lot of them, who are probably glad I'm gone, didn't believe me. This is the second announcement I've seen. 

Serious question for those who submitted to the first [injection] demand: At what point is it enough? Are you of the opinion that you'll take every shot they demand no matter how frequent? 

If so, does none of this even make you think about how [in]effective these shots are? I mean 3 shots in ONE YEAR. Some countries are looking at shot number four. So far, at best, these are symptom reducers. No different (in effect) than Tylenol. Do you trust your employer to dictate any other medication they decide you should have?

Serious question. Remember what they sold you. They said it would STOP infection and transmission. They said if you got these shots that life would go back to normal. That's what you were promised. How much of that has come true for you? If you're in NY the state just said that regardless of "vaccination", you have to put on a mask indoors and that's on top of the barring of "unvaccinated" from many places.

Now, YOU will soon be the "un-vaccinated" do YOU think that is fair?

Now I'm not surprised this came from NYU because their "ethics professor" is just fine with this

It's the CCP Social Credit system coming into being in the US.

 And apparently enough of you are OK with it because well you "feel safe".

Don't Let This Happen To You: A Financial Story

 So per the last post, The Ghost is being shown the door. So as you should do, I checked my accounts to confirm [again] my financial situation. I reached out to the representative of the company that a large amount of my retirement account balance lives in. What I was told left me in tears.

I'm not kidding.

If you work for the state of NJ you need to read this because there is a high likelihood that you are unaware of what's going on with "your" money. So when I started working for the state of NJ, I had a 403b. At some point, the actual year I do not recall, when I increased my contributions, A second account was appeared on my paycheck. My mistake was that I was only concerned about the total being deducted rather than asking WHY there was a second line with a different code?

Well apparently this line represented the fact that this money was going into a 401A account. What is that? I cannot exactly describe it to you but it contains a SERIOUS kicker if you are less than 55, and I'll add less than 40. Here';s the kicker:

 You do not have access to the employer matching contribution. Nor do you have access to the *gains* made on the employer contributions.  Since most of the time the employers *match* the employee contribution, this means that whatever your total amount is in these accounts, you only have access to at most 50% of it until you are 55.

So say you are 45 and amassed $500,000. You get the boot from your job or leave on your own and  was looking to tap your retirement (20% tax hit along with 10% penalty) you suddenly only have access to 250k. Of course in REAL terms you only have access to 70% of that  ($175k).

So if you got into a long stretch of unemployment, you have far less to fall back on than you thought.

Now sure that portion you can't touch is still growing (hopefully) while you can't touch it, but damn, Imagine not realizing you can't touch it when you needed it? What if you have far less than $250k  and now when you thought you had a year's cushion, you barely have 6 months.

So why have I posted this?

Well if this situation applies to you, I want you to contact your financial advisor and find out what is allocated where and what you have access to for an extended emergency...like legal representation.

The Ghost Is Terminated

So today at 11AM, I received notice of pending termination due to "non-compliance" with the "vaccine mandate" at my place of employment. 

I was expecting this shoe to drop. The only question was when. It's one of the reasons posts here have been very sporadic. A little about me:

I've been employed, continuously, since 1995. I had one week without pay (not including furloughs) when I transitioned into this last job in 1999.  Cumulatively I have 30 years of computer experience going back to the Apple computer (pre-Macintosh) and IBM PS2.

22 years at the same employer. No disciplinary issues ever. No negative performance evaluations ever. Created jobs for people who will be there after me. Programs I wrote run entire class programs (yes this is a university) and have been for 15 years. 

Then the pandemic hit.

While I shared the early alarm, I quickly came to realize that something was very wrong. I didn't realize just how wrong things were. See, my mistake, which I discussed in an earlier post, was that I thought there were bright lines that nobody would cross. Lines that *could not* be crossed.

I was wrong and by the time I realized it, it was too late. The plans were being drawn up, the employees had been thoroughly scared and everybody was afraid to lose their jobs. So they all went along hoping the axe wouldn't fall on them. Some truly believed in the narrative too.

I the end though, bright lines were crossed without consequence. I have learned that I am surrounded by many petit tyrants. I am also surrounded by people who are scared to death of these petit tyrants. I am surrounded by people "just doing their jobs".

In the end though, 22 years of service and a flawless employee record meant shit. In the end me and my contributions, current and future, meant absolutely nothing to the admin members who "sat in judgment". They wanted control of my body or they wanted me gone. 

Lesson? Nobody is indispensable. There is no loyalty.

One thing I have kept in mind is that there are a lot of people who are in worse situations than mine. Who have far. less prospects than I do. Honestly, I've had a pretty uneventful life up until now. But you know...variance. Ha. As I've said to people in regards to the pandemic: Everybody is going to get their turn. Hopefully it's not that bad.

So what's The Ghost going to do?

Honestly, I'm at a point where I don't want to work for anyone else ever again.  I'd like to move to a "free state" but that would entail abandoning or dislocating someone who depends on me. I'm not good with doing the latter, particularly during the winter months.

Some of you are wondering about legal options. Yeah, I'm looking at that but there's a lot to consider. Is paying for a lawyer AND the costs of a court fight worth it? Could the time and money be better spent pursuing future "investments"? I'm not dealing with federal mandates, I'm dealing with a state mandate (none of which have had decisive decisions yet). I have a "unique" situation where I have no religious or medical reason to not take any shot hence my claim lies on conscientious objection which, in terms of the mandates is "new" ground.  Say I prevail but not in the way of 'early retirement' levels of compensation. Do I really want to work for people who were willing to treat me like this? No.

So yeah, 30+ years of employment and The Ghost is facing termination for something completely unrelated to work performance. Only in Joe Biden's America.

Y'alls VP

This Is The Time

 No more mucking about. When governments and society oppressed a class of people in America brave souls went and did this:

 

 

Now is the time. You are either the people at the counter or you are the crowd abusing them.

You are either "On The Bus" or you are the people attacking the bus.

It is time for massive levels of civil disobedience and refusal to comply.  It is time to confront the cowardly businesses who are complying with the immoral and illegal discrimination. It is time to put the various PD's on notice that we will not stand and gawk and point our phones but remain impotent as they enforce the illegal and immoral. 

The time is now.

Either you are as bold as the people above or you are a coward unworthy of their legacy.

Official State CrackHouse but You Can't Go To The Gym

 So just in case any the fuck body thinks that these people are about health.

NYC has opened official state crack houses with NYC tax payer money.

But if you refuse to take an experimental biological product YOU can't go to the gym.

I got nothing else to say.

Total "Vaccine" Narrative Collapse

 No, we're not going to talk about the blood clots,  heart problems and deaths. No, instead we go directly to the conceit behind the various mandates: Stopping the transmission. 

Many of us who have been looking at the data and knew of the past in regards to coronaviruses did not believe the claims of stopping the transmission. And since we were and are fair, we waited on data. Slowly but surely the data came out and even the government agents had to admit that the "vaccines" did not prevent transmission or infection. And yet and still governments around the world have been violating basic human rights in regards to deciding what they put in their bodies on this completely fraudulent premise.  Some countries going to the extent of creating camps for people who *may* have had contact with someone who popped up positive. Now we have total evidence that the 'vaccine your way out" argument is a total and utter fraud:

The money shot:

"The first person in Oslo confirmed as infected had attended the party, where at least one employee had just returned from South Africa. All the attendees were fully vaccinated and had tested negative before the event."

"Our working hypothesis is that at least half of the 120 participants were infected with the Omicron variant during the party. This makes this, for now, the largest Omicron outbreak outside South Africa."

"fully vaccinated". "120 people infected during the party."

Fortunately so far nobody has been hospitalized. I'm not a ghoul so I don't wish ill on any of them. Given that they are young and presumably in decent metabolic shape, they were ALWAYS expected to have either no symptoms or mild symptoms. It's been that way since the beginning.

So clearly the "stopping the spread" claim is NOT the real exit plan. In fact there IS NO EXIT PLAN.

The plan is as follows:

1) Shovel money to big pharma for no less than yearly "vaccinations" while shielding them from liability.

2) Get you to "consent" to digital tracking making a universal "papers please" a -la China Social Credit system. This will morph into a means for the state, via corporate entities to control your access to goods and services and hence control your behavior.

3) Long term killing off of dissenters while "training" the next generation to accept the "new normal" as "THE NORMAL" as they will know nothing else and will have the mentality of "what's the big deal with..."

Again, there is no exit plan. The ones at the top know. All they need is for the people below them to "do their jobs" whether they "know" or not. That's the things with grand 'conspiracies"; only a very few need to be in the know, the rest, useful idiots, only need to "do their jobs". This is playing out world wide. There will become a point where it is too late.

Jim Cramer: Just Grow The Moustache And Quit Pretending

 So I don't watch Mr. Shouty. However; a clip of him came to my attention yesterday and though I resisted commenting on it, I decided he needed a dedicated post because he represents more people than you or I may think. So here's the clip via the Dan Bongino show (skip to minute 10 if it doesn't go there directly):

So let's go over why Cramer just needs to grow the mustache:

1) "Eisenhower would be aghast that we have "immunocompromised people" who are incubators  for every variant to come"

Firstly in regards to the latest variant, it was discovered in so-called 'fully vaccinated" people who had also taken a "booster".

Secondly, people who have not taken a shot are NOT immunocompromised. When someone is immunocompromised, it means their immune system does not work as designed. That you may fail to mount an effective immune response to a challenge does not mean you are compromised. You just drew the short straw which each and every one of us will do at some point.  There is growing evidence that persons who take one of the shots ARE in fact immunocompromised as it may be the case that their immune system no longer functions as designed hence the new infections. In stark contrast to those who have successfully fought off the infection. Those persons have been shown to be immune from currently known strains.

So right there Cramer is telling fantastically epic lies.

2) "Walking around lawfully unvaccinated. That's psychotic."

 Yeah sir. See we own our bodies and decide what will and will not be put into it. That right is protected from government infringement via the supreme document of the land. If you don't like it, grow the moustache and take a one-way flight to Germany.

3) "We have governors who want to be president by grandstanding on a foolish "states rights" issue"?

Yeah, that foolish and pesky constitution. I mean why would an elected head of [a] state defend and uphold that silly piece of paper?

4) "The right to get sick" 

Yes. You absolutely have the right to get sick. Whether you SHOULD try to is another argument altogether. But you absolutely have that right. 

5) "The right to get other people sick?"

Depends. You cannot purposely try to infect someone with a deadly disease or poison them and things like that. You CAN walk around minding your own business and if you happen to pass along an illness you have you aren't liable. It's considered the normal risk of living life. Prior to March 2020 that was widely understood. 

6) "Have the military run it"

Openly advocates for a police state. Grow the mustache sir.

7) "If you don't want to be vaccinated you better be ready to prove your conscientious objector status in court."

So first thing with this is that Cramer thinks that the people have the burden of proof here. No. The state has the burden of proof. They must prove that the measure they want to take that completely infringes on the property right of the individual is necessary. Of course when you are itching to grow the mustache, you already think the opposite.

Second, notice that he wants YOU to have the burden of financing a defense in front of the same state that wants to infringe on your rights.  No conflict of interest here. Of course that is why the founders put these "shall not be infringed" rights into the supreme legal document of the land. If you have the right then there is no need for a court case because no action can be taken against you. If an action against your right(s) has occurred then it is the STATE that is at fault.

8) Even then you need to help with the war effort by staying home until we finally beat this thing."

So Cramer is advocating for indefinite detention of citizens.

Grow the mustache.

Also, most sane scientists concede that SarsCOV-2 is endemic and is unlikely to go away. Ever. This is particularly true because it has non-human reservoirs in which it can incubate and mutate. I don't expect Cramer to understand these things. But you the reader should know this so that you can recognize this false argument when it is offered.

I'll say it again: One of the most profound things to have been revealed since March of 2020 is just how many people are good with dictatorships. Same people who think MLK and Rosa Parks are heroes are acting like the people who opposed them and they are too dumb to see it. 

As for Cramer, he revealed himself. Let those with ears hear and eyes see.

Because The First Three Worked

 Times of Israel:

"Both of the doctors work at the hospital outside of Tel Aviv and one of them had recently returned from a conference in London. That doctor then came in close contact with their colleague, likely infecting them, Sheba said, noting that both had received three doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine and were only experiencing mild symptoms."

Oh. And I'm glad it's mild...like 90+ percent of all cases since the beginning.

But then this:

 

Because clearly, the first three worked to "stop the spread".

As I pointed out in my last post. This is not about informing or "helping" you. This is propaganda and it is a bare naked power grab. They know it. They know you know it and they dare you to stop them.

Beware The "Command Language"

A while back (years) I had posts in which I discussed Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP). This came back to mind as I listened to a podcast where the guest was discussing a "mentalist" game in which he asked the listeners to go through a step of "suggestions". He was discussing how at the end of the sequence most people came up with something like an "orange kangaroo in Denmark".

What he was demonstrating was that how the brain can be manipulated into thinking certain things simply by being pushed into a certain direction via input.  In today's society the elites have pushed mass mental manipulation to levels unknown to society. This has been enabled by social media and always on media streams to our mobile devices.

A study came out years ago that discussed how the simple "ding" notification from our devices increases heart rates and stress levels. And that was before the message was even seen. This is why I often turn off all notifications on my device.  For example, I was out running with my heart rate monitor and I had left notifications on and a message came through. I had a 10BPM increase in heart rate for the next 5 minutes or so. 

It's no secret here that after the 2016 election I basically turned off all "news programs" because I realized that they were not "news" outlets but propagandist. By June of 2020 anyone who hasn't come to that realization either likes the propaganda, makes the propaganda (profits off of it),  has been scared senseless from it and needs to recover OR is just that dumb.  

That was an epic run-on sentence no?

One of the things I noted over the years is the increasing use of "command language" in articles and e-mails. The latest to drop into my mail:

Now since I am aware of such "suggestions" my mental block immediately kicked in. That is, I [often] recognize "command language" when I see it and put my defenses up. If you haven't figured it out I'll point it out:

"What to know..."

The header should have said "what we know". When they write "what to know" then they are suggesting to you that whatever follows IS what is to be known. Anything else shall "not be known". 

Second: "Here'swhat you need to know."

Again, they are telling you that you have a need. Really? I need to know? Why do I "need" to know rather than "may want to know"?  By hooking "Here" with 'need to know", they are commanding that what follows is what you "need" to know and anything else is "not needed". 

This is reflective of the authoritarian streak that has permeated the left and through them, is imposing itself on the whole society. You see, thinking for yourself is dangerous to authorities. Authorities must tell people 'what they need to know" and "what they need to do" and "what they need to feel". Also for the people that accept this programming, it is easier precisely because you don't need to think.Why think when you are told "what to know".

Beware of these messages. Train your mind to recognize and reject them. And turn off notifications on your devices. Your adrenal glands will thank you for it.

Sure Brandon. Sure.

 I'm gonna leave this right here without further comment.

Right on Cue: The New Variant

 I'm  not going to waste your or my time on this. Anyone with w high enough IQ understands what's going on both politically and biologically.

Politically "variants" are the excuse to extend the 'emergency" which allows governments to indefinitely suspend your individual "inalienable rights" like deciding what will and will not go into your body. They need these variants as cover. Expect the new "omicron" variant to show up in court proceedings. That this variant showed up in "fully vaccinated" people won't matter because they will say that it was the "fault" of the "unvaccinated" as to why "omicron" shows up in the first place.

Biologically, anyone with a high enough IQ knew from early on that a virus that has a high transmission rate and a high mutation rate (facilitated by transmission) will be near impossible to 'vaccinate" against. Prime example being the "flu shots" which have to be "reformulated" every year for what the experts think will be the dominant strains. These shots sometimes have an effective rate in the 30% range. 

So we [who can see] knew the deal.  I wrote many times in this space that the best thing you can do is to find out if you are vitamin D deficient and correct that pronto. If you wasted the past year not getting your vitamin D levels addressed, that's your own fault. Secondly, we know that Zinc and Quercetin were good for prophylaxis and early treatment.  I provided links to the papers showing that they work and HOW they work. By this point you should have a stack of zinc and Quercetin, both available OTC, at the ready.

Lastly, a Spanish study showed that anti-histamines were effective in dealing with elderly patients in nursing homes. You should have some at the ready. 

The FLCCC recommends a mouth wash. If you don't do that, start now. Once in the AM and once in the PM before bed. If you're going out, take a hit before you go and then again as soon as you get back. The idea is to kill anything in your throat before it can move down into the lungs in large numbers. I'm partial to oil of oregano but it's strong and some people may not want to have that taste on their breath.

Lastly, it's wintertime. This means that you're indoors a lot. You should make sure to have good air filtration. I have one that runs  24-7. Been doing that for years. When I saw what was filtered out I was a believer. Also indoor humidity is very important. Dry nasal passages are a big reason for seasonal flues and COVID. I personally don't like to see below 40% but if you're below 30% you should look into a humidifier or keep water boiling on your stove to bring it up. Just remember that if it's TOO damn you run the risk of mold.

So don't fall for the fear campaign.

Ahmaud Part 8: The Verdict

 So the three men have been found guilty of felony murder. For those unfamiliar, felony murder is when during the commission of some crime a person or persons are killed.  Even if there was no intent to kill, the fact that you were committing some other crime, makes that homicide murder. This is significant because as I had been arguing, I did not see how they could be found guilty of murder because there would be the issue of intent. Since those guys claimed that they were trying to do a citizens arrest, it would be nigh impossible to prove criminal intent. So here I will explain why I both agree and disagree with the verdict.

Putting on my "if I'm the juror" hat (I've been there a few times), given what I know about the case, there were two major things that would support the jury's verdict. First is that evidence of Ahmaud using the "jogger" routine as cover for his known criminal behavior was NOT allowed in this trial. This is key. I have argued from the beginning that the "innocent jogger" claim was and is bogus. I stand by that. Why? Because I'm a runner. I know many runners and not a single one of them would EVER stop their run to trespass on someone's property (under construction or not) and look around. No not even, as some tried to claim, "to get water." 

I also know that people who engage in criminal behavior like that ALWAYS have a "cover" act. They don't just go up to their victim or target all obvious about their intentions. So to me, the whole "jogger" thing smelled of cover and that evidence of prior behavior underscored that. However; the jury did not get that information and couldn't presume it. Hence they could only consider that Ahmaud was in fact "just a jogger".

The second thing was that, as I understand it, the testimony was that the defendants not only didn't see the burglary or tresspas themselves, but that they didn't even know about it.  I've seen the diagram of the events as well as "non-sworn" testimony to the contrary and believed that even if they didn't actually see the alleged burglary or trespass but that they were told he was there or had just left. Which brings me to a common point I make here: People say things all the time but when they are under oath, the truth usually comes out. If the defendants did not see the events and had not been contacted about the events, then the jury could reasonably conclude that their going after and detaining Ahmaud was unlawful and the resulting death was a murder. 

Those same set of circumstances eliminates the self-defense claim made by the defense because it would be Ahmaud that was defending himself, even though he clearly grabbed the gun.

So based strictly on the rules of the court and the instructions given to the jury I cannot disagree with their conclusion. I don't think appeals will go far because both the evidence of the "jogger cover" and the "we were told he had just..." evidence would have to be considered. That would require someone to recant testimony. I don't see that happening.

Charlottesville and Waukesha

I saw the news of the red vehicle driving through a Christmas parade. Decided not to post about it though I had a good idea on the who and why.  To test my theory, I decided to wait 24 hours and see if it dropped out of my newsfeed. If it did, then I knew I was right about the "who" and the why would soon come out.

Sure enough, 12 hours later, my news feed lacked any mention of what appears to be a total hate crime and mass murder. Sure enough hours later, the "who" was verified and the why a high likelihood.

I'm not going to rehash my commentary on the [lack of] black leadership who are in part to blame for this incident. What I'm going to do instead is compare this to Charlottesville because this case will show the US population what kind of "justice system" we have (although the situation surrounding the Jan 6 people is bad enough).

So for those unfamiliar, there was a 'right wing" Unite The Right event in Va in which the police and state government totally failed in their duty to protect the attendee's first amendment right to peaceful assembly.

As a result, multiple skirmishes broke out between various parties. At some point a person named James Field ran his vehicle into a group of protestors which resulted in the death of one person

Avowed neo-Nazi James Fields Jr. was given a second sentence of life in prison for killing a woman and injuring dozens when he rammed his car into a group of people protesting a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017.

On Monday, Charlottesville Circuit Judge Richard Moore sentenced Fields to the life term plus 419 years and $480,000 in fines, in keeping with a jury's recommendation.

So note. guy runs his car into a crowd. One death. 419 years and $480k in fines.

Now, this guy in Waukesha has a history of anti-white statements (and apparently a self-confession of pimping out a minor). He ran into a crowd of people where at least 5 died and "dozens" injured.

If driving into a crowd in Charlottesville with one death merits 419 years. We should expect no less for this guy. In fact, by the Charlottesville logic, this guy should be up for 2100 years. Let's see what happens.

The Rittenhouse Verdict: Y'all Need Better 'Leaders'

 I didn't comment on the Rittenhouse case for a few reasons: 

1) The exculpatory evidence was so strong that the case should never EVER been brought to trial.

2) The self-defense case was so strong that the only real news that could come out is if the jury convicted.

I did watch video of the trial and discovered the case was stronger than I imagined. It is and was a clear case of malicious prosecution. But this post isn't about the case. This post is about the media and political talking heads and black folks. Yes, this post is directed specifically at black folks.

Y'all need a better class of leadership. As a matter of fact you need leadership WITH class. These people have you out here defending pedophiles. Actual convicted sex offenders. For real. When did that become OK in the black community?

These talking heads got you speaking against [armed] self-defense. Since when is the black community against armed self-defense? Do you people not even know your own history? How are you going to say Harriet Tubman is a hero to you but then turn around and talk about "transporting a gun across state lines"?

The "F" is wrong with y'all?

How are you going to say that the Black Panthers are hero's to you but then turn around and talk about he shouldn't have had a gun and he crossed state lines?

The "F" is wrong with y'all?

The Deacons for Defense are supposed to be hero's to y'all but y'all against being armed and crossing state lines?

The "F" is wrong with y'all?

Amy Garvey traveled armed and the UNIA had the African legion and y'all complaining about self-defense?

See the problem with far too many.of you is that white people and whiteness are the sun, moon and stars to y'all.  Too many of your leaders (they aren't mine) are making large bank making and keeping you deaf dumb and blind. People like Joy Reid are paid more in a year than a lot of you will even retire with (assuming you CAN retire) to tell you straight out lies.  These politicians being paid with the taxes taken off the top of your paycheck (if you even still have a job) and they lie directly to your face.

You should be glad Kyle was acquitted. It means that YOUR right to self-defense is secure. That's GOOD for you black people.  You do realize YOU are a citizen right? You do understand that you have the same rights as Kyle right? 

Carter G. Woodson said that the negro, that;s you, is so conditioned to his condition that when there is no 'back door" he will go make one for himself. That's y'all. denying your own right in order to own someone you were told was a white supremacist.

Y'all stupid.

These white liberals told y'all who to be mad at and too many of y'all were all "Yass boss. We sick."

Imagine our ancestors saying some dumb "sh" like "Mz. Tubman, we can''t be crossing no state line with that gun."

So lets be clear on what lies they told you:

1) No he did not cross state lines with a gun. The gun was already in the state.

2) In that state a person his age can open carry a gun. That's why the judge threw out the charge.

3) All the evidence showed that Kyle was attacked and waited until the last second to shoot his attackers. YOU should and are free to do the same if similarly situated.

4) Though it wasn't relevant to the case at hand, each of those persons were already convicted criminals. One of which was a known pedophile. He was literally assaulting [another] minor when justice was served to him. 

5) Not that it matters, but none of those shot were black.

Those are the facts, And if you didn't get those points from the media heads and politicians you "trust" then YOU have a serious misinformation problem and need to seriously re-evaluate not only what it is you believe but WHO you trust for information.

Lastly, if they've been lying to your face all this time about Kyle, how much lying do you think they are doing in regards to COVID?

You better think long and effing hard on that last point.

Kyle R Not Guilty

 As the evidence showed.

Let the lawsuits begin!

It Didn't Work The First Three Times So...

 

In the science world there is this thing called "replication". If you take an experiment and do it over and over again and get the same results then you pretty much know what to expect the next time. If the results are something you don't want to have happen, then you have to, you know, change the experiment. After all, you already know the likely outcome.

Here we have Austria "re-imposing" a full COVID lockdown.

"Austria will enter a fourth national lockdown on Monday as Covid-19 cases continue to surge, becoming the first country in Western Europe to impose stringent measures this fall."

4th national lockdown?

 Their first lockdown came in March 2020. They thought it worked because they saw a small blip. But as the chart showed, the reason for the "small blip" was that they were "out of season". It had nothing to do with lockdown. Then they had a quiet "off season". Again, they thought it was the masks they imposed. But we know that coronaviruses are seasonal. 

In Oct of 2020 they introduced lockdowns again. However there was no effect and the spike was much larger than the first. This was their first 'full season". Note that by April of 2021 they were back down into the range of their April count. And I believe that the count in April was an undercount. 

Not satisfied with the October one, they introduced anther in Feb 2021 which also did nothing.

Now with 65% of their population "vaccinated" they are having a case spike that is the largest they've seen. What changed? 

Right.

The "good" thing about their current situation is that the death rate, which trails the case rate is slower than last season. 

That aside. The whole "lets do another lockdown" is ridiculous. 

"The country’s unvaccinated are already barred from leaving their homes for non-essential purposes.

Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg announced at a press conference on Friday that those lockdown measures would be extended to the entire country from Monday. The lockdown would last for a maximum of 20 days, Schallenberg said, but would initially be put in place for 10 days."

Here we are with governments deciding who and what work is "essential" again. 

And oh look, those who took the shot and thought they were exempt are being locked up too. And yes, they are being locked up. This is an open prison. You are being locked up "for your own good". And I'm pretty sure a number of these people who took the shot(s) were looking down on the "unvaccinated" and sneering as they "got their freedom". 

Oh, and you thought you owned your body?

"In a first for the region, he also announced that Covid vaccination would become mandatory in Austria from Feb. 1." 

Ha. Sure.

Look, the only reason any of this is in effect is because: 

1) The people accept it.

2) The police enforce it.

When the people stop accepting it and the police refuse to enforce it, the entire thing stops. This is why I have repeatedly put the spotlight on the enforcers (police). They are the gatekeepers. If they refuse to enforce these anti-human policies, then the policymakers are no more than speakers. 

But the reason they do not is because of that human failing where once given power over others, a lot of people will "follow orders" because they get a kick out of being a person who can say "no".

There are a lot of such people in America. The one thing stopping them from going full Austria is that there is a large armed population. That large armed population is kept in check by a combination of respect for law and order, fear of the feds, and the occasional sheriff who tells his deputies to "act like they know." But trust and believe that if the US was as disarmed as these other countries we'd be in no better shape here.

So You Wanted $15 Per Hour Eh?

 I'm not against people being properly paid for their labour. What I do know is that you can't force someone to use YOUR labour. I also know that some jobs were never meant to be jobs that supported a person as their sole source of income. Also generally, the less skill your job requires, the less pay you get because there are that much more people who can do that job. But what happens when you ask for too much money for your labour? What happens when you're not competing with other people, but with machines that require no breaks, no "benefits" and can work 24/7/365? Well a lot of people are going to find out:

Meet your $1/hour replacement. Why not "free"? Well, all machines require maintenance and have an upfront cost. So say you have 3 "cooks" who require a $24k/year salary for 3 shifts. That's $75k. You get one of these machines to do their work all day. Even if it costs you 24k/year to maintain, you've saved 50k.

Here's their projections/cacluations:

Now what?

I've had a lot of posts on automation and AI and the disruption it's going to create. Don't sleep.

Ahmaud Part 7: The Trial

A lot of people were "upset" because I did not agree with the "running" narrative. None of it made sense given what we knew at the time. I found it most preposterous that people were making claims like: 

" When I run, I regularly go onto homes undergoing renovation/construction and look around."

No. Nobody, no real runner, does this. 

There were other claims made about whether he was trespassing or not. I believed (and still believe) he was trespassing.

I have also said that in the end, we will know the facts when people are put under oath with the threat of jail time if they are caught lying. And now:

So, under oath:

1) Not jogging. Check

2) Was casing out property for "weeks and months" and had been caught on video doing so.

3) The Homeowner had called police multiple times and asked neighbors to intervene.

4) Police told neighbors they believed Ahmaud was committing burglaries and they should consider him armed and dangerous.

The trial is still ongoing. Maybe some of these people have perjured themselves. I doubt it. But if they haven't then I have a word for the NYC marathon organizers:

Shame on you for perpetrating a fraudulent narrative when you should have stayed out. 

Lithuania: Police State

I'm certain that some people are "bored" or "bothered" by all the COVID talk on the blog. The below is an example of why I do this:

 

 

If you don't think that people in power here in the US aren't looking at Lithuania and wondering how they can do the same thing here then you have not been paying attention. This is why I continue to provide evidence and data.  This is THE human rights issue of the day. THE.

Those Durn Case Numbers

 A while back I posted some UK data and discussed how one should not be tricked by "per 100k" numbers because 1% of a huge number is a far greater number than 1% of a small number:

"Going back to our 1000 vs 100 example. Say that 1% of the 1000 population dies of the shot. Again that's 10 people. However in the smaller group, if you had 10% of them die from not being vaccinated, then it would be the same numbers dead. This is why even "low" failure rates on a widely used medicine is, well SHOULD, be alarming to anyone who is numerate. a 1% failure rate of a drug given to 330 million people is 3.3 million dead. If you do a proper long term study with say 100k people and found out 1% die, at least you only killed 1,000 people rather than 3.3 million."

 

So here we have some data out of the UK again and lo and behold:

 

Oh.

Notice the outlier "unvaccinated" group is the last group to have been offered the experimental drug.

Here's the link to the source material (always look at the source material. Don't take my word for it):

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1032859/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_45.pdf

Once again we'll see that the 40-49 age group is where the inflection point resides:

basically, if you are 50+ years old and you take one of the shots and you get infected with COVID to teh extent that you present a positive PCR high enough to indicate a high viral load, your chances of dying, vs a non-vaccinated person of the same age and co-morbidity status is MUCH higher. 

Dems the numbers. Just like I said would happen as the "vaxxed" population grows.
 

COVID 1996

 

Thanks Tony Heller

That Durn "Horse Dewormer"

 Sorry for not posting over the past week or so. There are reasons for that which may be discussed in this space soon. No I'm not sick. Onto the topic. 

I'm going to keep this brief. We know that since late summer the CDC and allied propaganda outlets have done all they could to discredit the use of Ivermectin. There were various reasons for this but the primary one, the topic of this entry, is that the Pharma companies want to "make room" for their upcoming products that they could patent and sell at a high mark up. And so recently we have had numerous reports of the "new pill' that will "change everything" and "end the pandemic".

Not surprising.

So here's a nice video by Dr. John Campbell about the new drug:

Now a lot of the scientific jargon here may go over your head. That's OK. The short story here is that the pill prevents viral replication by targeting the enzyme responsible for cutting proteins.

Here's the thing. Ivermectin does the same thing and they know it.

So here is a screenshot of compounds that have the ability to do what the "new pill" does:

So the shorter bars indicate more effective inhibition. Note there are only two items that shows near total inhibition: Ivermectin and the GC327 product.

Here's the screenshot with the referenced Nature article shown:

Here's a screenshot of the article itself:

Now note the date: Jan 2021. This means that when the CDC and other outlets started making the claim that Ivermectin was not effective, they were lying. Straight out lying.

Why were they lying?

Right back to the opener: They have a product, that they can patent, ready to sell.  If you haven't figured out that the COVID racket is making a LOT of money for a LOT of people and therefore they will stretch this out as long as possible and guide policy that will allow them to realize returns well into the future, you have NOT been paying attention.

Note that "in silica" is a fancy means of saying "computer simulation". You may object to using computer simulations as "proof" that Ivermectin works. I would remind you that the current mRNA shots were created by the same modeling process. So if you object to one on those grounds, you must also object to the other.