(17 years of informed commentary)
Rumble:
BitChute:
5:00: Shall Not Be Infringed
10:30: Jenna Ellis Pleads Guilty to Constitutional Right.
20:00: Wishing to be wealthy is a felony in NY!
26:00: They Knew It Was Experimental But Forced Us Anyway
33:00: ...And Now They Want Forgiveness.
42:00: Dems Suddenly Concerned about Body Autonomy.
I previously mentioned the ridiculousness of the charges filed against Trump. Here's one of the "indicted co-conspirators" on the subject:
Following up on the video from yesterday where people were murdered by "treatment"; And yes, I'm calling it murder, David Knight reports on the NZ elites who exempted themselves from the Jab mandates.
You think it's only NZ?
Take 50 min out of your day to watch the video here:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/the-truth-about-covid-hospital-protocols-stella-paul-5510929?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf
I knew about Remdesir and I knew about the vents. I wrote about them. What I did not know was that they actually tied people to their beds when they were trying to take the ventilators off.
I recall when the whole Trayvon Martin killing occured. As I saw the facts come out, I saw many so called dissident conservatives saying that the killing of Trayvon was justified because Trayvon attacked Zimmerman. It was as if the entire event only started with the fight. Even to this day they still mis-represent the case and of course now use the trial as proof. Never mind that a trial was NOT proof enough in the case of OJ Simpson.
The facts of the case, for those unfamiliar are as follows:
Trayvon was visiting his father. Trayvon went to the local "bodega" to get some skittles and Iced Tea or some other drink. That detail is unimportant. Last I checked going to and from a store was not a sign of criminal activity.
On the way back from the store, Zimmerman saw Trayvon and decided to follow him. He followed close enough that Trayvon noticed. In court testimony it was revealed that he told a friend on the phone that he was being followed by a "creepy ass cracker" or something close to that effect.
Again, walking down the street, while on the phone is not a crime or reasonable suspicion of a crime. It's your right. Now a normal person, even if they suspected wrongdoing or potential wrongdoing would follow the person but not engage unless they saw an actual crime. Zimmerman however decided to not only follow Trayvon (stalking) but then exited his vehicle to confront Trayvon who was doing nothing wrong.
Trayvon, fearing for his life, decided to take on his stalker. He failed and died.
I would absolutely put hard cash down that if the races were reversed, Zimmerman would have been the dead hero who thwarted the attempts of a black assailant to rob him.
Some commentators went to such lengths to say that Trayvon should have identified himself to Zimmerman as if black people need to explain there presence to random white people on demand.
According to these conservatives if you have the position I do, it must be some BLM informed position. No, BLM is a fraud organization and Trayvon is still the victim.
So conservatives wonder why they can't get blacks to support them when they get obvious stuff like this wrong.
Similarly white conservatives cannot fathom why black people do not have a dim view of Mumia Abu Jamaal or Assata Shakur. They are aghast that these two shot police. Since these conservatives worship at the feet of police, many of whom turned on them when those lock downs happened, they cannot fathom how blacks could be friendly to someone who shot at them. For these conservatives, black persons who had run in with police must be criminals. Jan 6 notwithstanding.
These conservatives act as if COINTELPRO was (and is) not a thing. That many police, particularly at that time were hostile to black movements and often had standing orders to liquidate them.
These conservatives want us to act like Fred Hampton wasn't shot in his bed or Philly literally dropped a bomb on a house.
Now we have the attack on Israel by Hamas. As is the case for the occupied government that is the US, supposed US representatives went out of their way to support Israel and whatever they do in response. One such representative actually wore the military uniform of a foreign government (guess) to the chamber of government.
But the point here is that so called conservatives, were quick to denoun anyone who had any critique of Israel, including the fact that Israel didn't exist prior to 1948 and perhaps THAT is THE source of the problem.
They don't want to hear any of that.
The problem here is that black Americans remember this thing called slavery and segregation. They supported the ANC. Gaza and the West Bank are no different from Bantustans. Colonialism went out of style in the 1960s and Israel is effectively the last European colony (It was ruled by the British). Supporting colonialism is simply not going to fly with African-Americans. To be frank, it shouldn't fly with anybody.
But these so called conservatives who uphold property rights, can't be bothered with discussing how people's property was taken to create Israel. And they think they are going to win black votes with this attitude?
Which brings me to a question. Why this blind spot. Would any of these conservatives argue FOR apartheid South Africa today? A recolonization of Kenya, Uganda, Ghana? Perhaps Nigeria?
I don't think they would but perhaps I give them too much credit. So, if they wouldn't argue for such a thing why do they support the colonization of Palestine?
Ah yes, Arabs. MUSLIMS and the fear of Jihad. Well you know Steve Sailor talks about Invade the world, invite the world. You don't have to do either of them. Of course some of these conservatives have their attitude because they are Christians and they are looking for the second coming. Which of course will lead to the eternal damnation of the non-believers. Including Jews...
Yeah, I'm not dumb enough to support Democrats at the ballot box but don't mistake that for support for colonialism or Zionism. To be honest conservatives ought not have allowed BLM or Antifa to capture that argument.
History shows that oppression breeds violence. Not everyone goes silently into that great goodnight. For me, or any black person to deny that would be to deny Nat Turner and other slave uprisings that took "innocent lives". Republicans are not going to win over any formerly colonized or enslaved people by supporting a colony without exception.
Perhaps Republicans and conservatives are OK with not gaining ground with that group. In such a case, there is always expanding the share of the white vote. Just allow it to get bad enough for them before you run out of them to "share".
Here is The Ghost's proposed peace plan for Palestine.
1) There is a One State solution. There is no "State of Israel". There is no "State of Palestine". There is a state with an agreed upon name. I suggest "Judea" or "Jerusalem" or something else historical to both parties.
2) The Bantustans are ended. Palestinians are 1005 free to live and conduct their business as any other citizen of the state of [enter name from item 1].
3) Land Justice:
A) Palestinians are to be compensated for the land taken from them to create what was previously Israel.To that end there are 2 options:
1) Payment at current land and/or property value to whoever owned the land prior to 1948. In the case that person is dead, their immediate family can be paid. This can be split among siblings.
2) Rental payment to previous Palestinian owners at market rates. As with item one descendants can be paid where the previous owner is deceased.
3) Failing to abide by items One or Two, Settler family or their descendants must vacate the premises. Where the prior owner is unknown or cannot be found, the funds will go to establish a bank available to the previously disenfranchised.
In return. Hamas, Palestinian Authority, Islamic Jihad and whatever other armed group is to be disbanded. Any person found to be a member of such a group after the agreement is in effect shall be executed.
Once the agreement is settled, the border of the state shall be recognized by all parties, aggression against this state shall be condemned and any retaliation recognized as justified. This includes atomic and other mass destruction weapons.
Religious and ethnic based violence will not be tolerated. Any party engaging in such violence shall be executed. In cases where that person is caught *in the act* such execution shall be summary and immediate.
Once agreed upon, "bygones are bygones". Any party found to be conspiring for retaliation due to pre-agreement incidents will be imprisoned and their all assets confiscated.
At the implementation of The Agreement, the current government is dissolved. A caretaker government will run for 6 months, in order for elections to be held. This caretaker government shall only do as much as is necessary to run the government. No legislation shall be passed (other than needed to run the government) until the new government is seated.
Of course there are details to be hashed out but this is the most equitable solution that addresses the root cause of the conflict.
Hey NYS AG: Since nobody is above the law and Louis has actual evidence of fraud, When can we expect the prosecutions?
Rumble:
BitChute
3:00: Trump Trial Frauds
13:00: Pythago-what?
20:00: OSHA: "It Wasn't Me!"
36:39: Nobel Prize For COVID Shot
40:00: "Migrant Crisis": Follow The Money
55:00: Commie "Camps" go Mainstream among Democrats
Ep. 28 Trans, Inc: genital mutilation is not just a fad. It’s a full-blown industry. How did something this demented happen so quickly? Chris Moritz has been following the money. pic.twitter.com/N2em2hbTE8
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) October 4, 2023
I like movies about "the old world". Master and Commander is one of my favourites. Another one I like is The Last Duel.
Confess!
One of the reasons I like these movies is it shows just how easy life is for both men and women relative to the past. It's the same reason I use thoughts about US slavery as a motivator for my runs and workouts. This ain't hard. Slavery is hard. These kinds of things give one perspective.
For those unfamiliar with the movie, the essential plot is that there is an accusation of rape. In that day rape of a woman was a property crime against her male "owner" which would be her father or husband. If that case was not resolved "judicially" then a duel would ensue between the offended parties. If the woman's defender was killed in the duel, she would be seen as a liar and burnt alive.
Talk about incentives.
In such a society making certain accusations carried a high penalty. You couldn't call someone a rapist, in public and get away with it. Men who may consider raping a woman had to consider that they might end up dead by means of public impalement. Men involved with women had to consider that if such an accusation was made, they may have to fight to the death. Knowing this, one would have to seriously consider the morals of a potential wife. A whore wife could literally get you killed.
Today no such risks exist for men or women. But the risk is even less for women. A man who is accused of rape, which is now expansively defined, can have his reputation completely destroyed with no recourse. Even if a trial works out in his favour enough people will still consider him a rapist and that he just got lucky.
Defamation, back in the day, could get one killed via duel as well.
Women, this society is told, should be believed regardless of evidence short of video. Punishment against the accused should and will begin before a trial. And that assumes there is a trial. Now, if a the accused denies the charge, never brought to a court of law, he can be sued for defamation. This is what happened to Trump. He was accused of sexual assault by a woman and he denied it quite vigorously. For this he was sued and the woman won. Because she was defamed as if HE was not defamed by the charge *that was never proven beyond reasonable doubt*.
In the time of The Duel, Not only would Trump be able to ultimately "fight it out" but that woman would have risked being burnt to death. Do you honestly think she would have risked that back then?
Now we have Brand who has been accused in multiple media outlets of rape of multiple women. Unnamed as far as I know at this writing. Youtube, a Google company, well Alphabet, demonetized his videos and a UK minister actually wrote to other social media companies asking them to ban Brand as well.
Mind you, this is over accusations. Nothing founded, never charged and for events that are, to my understanding at least a decade old. So now we are at a point where an accusation produces punishment of the accused (sometimes by the same government that would be charged with providing a fair trial!) while hiding and protecting the accuser.
This underscores my point for a long time that one of the major reasons the US is going to shit is because there are no consequences for bad behaviors by the ruling class and women, in US society are quickly becoming a Ruling Class. Since there are no consequences to leveling false charges against people/enemies, there is no incentive to not do it. If a case is lost, they have not lost anything. Not even money since they, in government, spend taxpayer money. But lets stick with private accusations.
If the women in both Trump and Brand's case knew they were risking death if shown to be lying or at a minimum could not substantiate their claims, would they have spoken to anyone or sued?
Today we have many ways to prove a rape, in the classic sense, occurred. DNA, cameras to place the victim and assailant in the location. Potentially incriminating text messages, etc. Women who make an accusation that cannot be proven ought to face the same penalties the accused would have received. Rape claims made decades after the fact should be treated as libel and defamation against the accused unless actual evidence can be offered.
While private companies are free to do what they like, they should seriously reconsider supporting this "punish the accused" culture that has grown in the past decade. They should consider how they would like it if they were accused of some wrong doing and as a result were, say, de-listed from the stock exchange(s) and had all banking services cut off from them. I'm pretty certain they would not care for that one bit.
Do unto others...
I saw someone expressing frustration that Trump keeps talking up the "vaccine" at his rallies. I had wondered the same thing for a while. After all Fauci is not popular among his "base" and neither are the mandates. Nor the lock-downs. So why even remind people of The Shot? Then I saw another comment.
"Trump is talking to Democrats and others outside the party and MAGA".
And they are absolutely correct. Trump has the Republican nomination on lock. Short of some "black swan" event. Trump is not losing the primary. It is not unusual for the primary winner to move his or her messaging to those who may be persuadable in contested venues. Trump is just doing that earlier than is usual given the unusual circumstances he finds himself.
The reason why some anti-shot people don't get that is because, to an extent we live in a bubble. We "no shot" people are an extremely small population. 95% of the population took the shot. Many if not most of them voluntarily did it. There is no political win to bad talk the shot to that population no matter how correct you may be. To a population that still believes these shots are effective and actually saved lives, taking credit for getting it out, quickly, is a plus.
Where Trump is vulnerable on the subject, even among the persuadable class, is the lockdown. It is clear that Trump essentially handed the power to Fauci and Birx. Reading Scott Atlas' book, makes it clear thaty Birx and Fauci had an agenda and I personally think should be executed via firing squad. But this abdication of leadership to these people highlights a major Trump weakness:
Poor staffing decisions.
Trump is too easily impressed by people, shocking given his "Apprentice" persona. Per the nature of his business he has to trust the people he delegates responsibility to. In a private business, if those people fail, at worst the business fails and that's it. When it comes to national office, that kind of fail, destroys the country. Stakes are way too high for those kinds of mistakes.
And this brings us to another problem. Lets say there is another Trump term. Who is going to staff it? After seeing what Democrats have done with the "justice system" [sic] who's willing to risk working for Trump? And if there are people with sense who would work for Trump, would he be bright enough to hire them? I honestly don't know.
Anyway, the point here is that, you (likely) and I may know that these shots are far more dangerous than COVID for the vast majority of the population, but that knowledge is not shared by much of the public. For them shots and boosters are "science" that is saving millions of lives. In that kind of environment, talking up the shots is a political winner.
Rumble:
Bitchute
Discussion on human nature and how to resist the growing tyranny
A devastating article in Der Speigel on current day South Africa.
"9910. That was the train I used to take to work every day. The last one ran six years ago," an aging Black man says in disgust as he walks past the station entrance. He adds caustically: "We used to have work when the whites were in charge, and life was better."
It’s hard to believe: A 60-year-old Black man, who was oppressed and exploited for half his life, misses the Apartheid era?
I remember when Apartheid ended. My peers and I were all "black man's time now". And how South Africa would show the world how it could be done. We were annoyed, to put it mildly about the Truth and Reconciliation committee and the entire idea of forgiving anyone who confessed.
Much later did I come to understand WHY they were done. America had a similar outcome to it's civil war, hence the statues and names that have now been vilified and destroyed by those who know nothing but revenge and what they *think* is justice.
A few years ago when we were all deprived of our right to assemble (COVID lockdowns) I ran across many documentaries that shows just how bad a vast majority of black people have it outside of the United States. I posted a series because at the time with the dumb deification of George Floyd, so many people were talking about how "oppressed" they are.
You don't know oppression. Most of you don't even know poverty.
Franz Fanon discussed the native "middle class" and their problems. This article is a prime example of what Fanon was discussing. This is BLM "leadership" on a national level.
The lesson here, which may come to late for America, is that this dumb "woke" leadership will destroy a modern country. NYC is finding out the hard way how symbolic "anti-racism" comes to bite you in the butt. Whereas South Africa had a revolution that put incompetent and corrupt people into power, America is voluntarily going down this road. And here's the thing, The further down the road you go, the harder it is to stop and reverse course. The more drastic the actions have to be. Most people don't have the stomach to do what needed to be done 20 years ago, what makes you think they currently have the stomach to do MORE than was required then?
Rumble
BitChute
3:30: NJ COVID Lawbreaking "settlement"
19:00: FDA Sued.
27:00 Backpack Kid.
45:00: Another Federal Judge Caping for Pedos.
56:00: NY Voters Keep shafting Themselves with their Sanctuary City.
This is the ideology of communists. NYC is run by communists. Yes, Eric Adams is a communist.
When you read that text you see the following:
"Hochul has faced pressure from municipal leaders, including in the political battleground in the Hudson Valley, to curb the busing of migrants into their communities."
See, NYC now reaping what they sewed when they declared itself a "Sanctuary City" where "Migrants are Welcome Here", thinks that your property, outside NYC, where you didn't do that dumb shit, is THEIR property.
"I think the governor’s wrong,” the mayor said. “She’s the governor of the state of New York. New York City is in that state.\county in this state should be part of this.”"
In other words Adams thinks it appropriate to use the force of the state to overrule the will of people NOT in NYC.
"Adams has recently urged Hochul to issue a statewide order that would bar municipalities from trying to block the arrival of migrants through local edicts.
See, these people who talk about how Orange Man is a threat to democracy openly use the state to override the democratic will of those who oppose them. The municipalities went through their legal processes to decide to not violate federal law. Adams doesn't approve and so wants to override the "democratic process."
Don't worry, NYC residents will continue to vote for these Democrats though. Orange Man [Party] Bad.
Rumble
BitChute
7:03 New COVID Variant. "Vaccinated" Vulnerable.
19:20" ModRNA sRNA
29:00: What's This in the Pfizer Insert?
39:00 For The Want of a Vagina a Life Was Lost
50:00: Dollar Getting BRIC[ed]
Larry Elder checked Charlemagne the God .🤣🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/sgcRRiRbmN
— HotepDrelly 🇺🇸 (@Drellyhotep) August 17, 2023
So CNN put out an article about the GA prosecutor looking to bring a case against Trump.
Well this sounds serious. Voting System breach? That sounds really serious. I would think the average person reading that headline would think that the Trump team had breached the voting system during the election which lead to false output.
"CNN —
Atlanta-area prosecutors investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia are in possession of text messages and emails directly connecting members of Donald Trump’s legal team to the early January 2021 voting system breach in Coffee County, sources tell CNN."
"January 2021 voting system breach".
January. Wouldn't that be after the ballot casting was done? Why yes. Ballots were cast on Nov 3. So whatever this "breach" is, it didn't occur during the casting of ballots. It would also appear that this breach occurred after the counting. Still though, if there was a "breach" of voting systems, then we should know who did it. After all, voting systems should not be breached by unauthorized parties.
"Trump allies attempted to access voting systems after the 2020 election as part of the broader push to produce evidence that could back up the former president’s baseless claims of widespread fraud."
Interesting. So Trump's allies were trying to find (produce) evidence of voter fraud. In the process they "attempted to access voting systems". I see. So they hired a hacker or some other "black hat" group to "breach" the voting systems? Is that what we're alleging?
"Since then, new evidence has slowly been uncovered about the role of Trump’s attorneys, the operatives they hired and how the breach, as well as others like it in other key states, factored into broader plans for overturning the election."
"Operatives they hired..." Perhaps a clandestine hacking group. This may be a serious problem.
"Together, the text messages and other court documents show how Trump lawyers and a group of hired operatives sought to access Coffee County’s voting systems in the days before January 6, 2021,"Lawyers and "operatives". Oh my. Trump got his lawyers to get some "operatives" to "Breach" the voting system in order to "produce evidence". This is sounding really bad for Trump.
"Six days before pro-Trump operatives gained unauthorized access to voting systems, the local elections official who allegedly helped facilitate the breach sent a “written invitation” to attorneys working for Trump, according to text messages obtained by CNN."
Operatives gained "unauthorized access" to voting systems...had been given a "written invitation"?
"On January 1, 2021 – days ahead of the January 7 voting systems breach – Katherine Friess – an attorney working with Giuliani, Sidney Powell and other Trump allies shared a “written invitation” to examine voting systems in Coffee County with a group of Trump allies.
So there was a "written invitation' to examine voting systems in a county.
"Investigators have scrutinized the actions of various individuals who were involved, including Misty Hampton, a former Coffee County elections official who authored the letter of invitation referenced in text messages and other documents that have been turned over to prosecutors, multiple sources told CNN."
So a county election official, Misty Hampton, wrote a "letter of invitation" to the Trump team to examine the voting systems.
If you have an invite to enter a place then you have NOT breached it.
There is no breach.
At worst, Misty Hampton did not have the authority to write such a letter or grant permission to examine voting systems. THAT would be a charge against her, not Trump or his team.
"During that same meeting, Giuliani alluded to a plan to gain “voluntary access” to machines in Georgia, according to testimony from him and others before the House January 6 committee."
"Gain voluntary access..."
A "breach" is not "voluntary access".
"
She and another location elections official, Cathy Latham, allegedly helped Trump operatives gain access to the county’s voting systems, according to documents, testimony and surveillance video produced as part of a long-running civil lawsuit focused on election security in Georgia.
Latham, who also served as a fake elector from Georgia after the 2020 election, has come under scrutiny for her role in the Coffee County breach after surveillance video showed she allowed unauthorized outsiders to spend hours examining voting systems there."
Again. If the county official invites your team to examine the voting system then you have not "breached" the voting system. There is no breach as far as this report goes. There *may* be officials who overstepped their authority. But that falls on the official, not the people they duped into believing they had the authority to do what they did.
This goes back to the Jan 6 prosecutions. When the videos came out on Tucker, I wrote about it. I mentioned that the key issue was whether the person knew they were trespassing. When the police were walking Shaman around the capitol building had they informed him that he was not authorized? These points matter. If the Trump team went to the extent of getting a "written invite" to examine the voting machines, then there is no criminal intent, and thus no crime.
The problem is that the justice system [sic] is so corrupted, that obvious stuff like this will still make it to a grand jury, a grand jury will indict (because orange man bad) and judges won't throw out these obviously fake charges and juries will convict. When the appeal finally gets it right, the defendant is drained of resources, had their reputation damaged and the people responsible will not have any accountability to deal with.
