As the power of the Tranny lobby grows and the CEI index continues to dictate to various corporations, the newspeak of Orwellian fame continues apace. I have long said and will continue to say that those who oppose the new religion must not use the newspeak or validate it in any way. This example is from CNN (not surprising eh?).
Just looking at the headline we see where CNNs interests lie. An alternate, and much more truthful headline would have been:
Kansas lawmakers override governor's veto to enact pro-woman sports law.
Note that this framing would have put the actual purpose of the law: to protect women in women's sports from men, front and center. Instead CNN shows that in it's world men competing in women's sports, as long as they claim to be a woman, is normal and expected and being against that is The Bad Thing(tm).
So the first lesson here is that whenever you see "anti-trans" you should replace that with "pro-women". In conversation always correct this.
"Transgender women and girls in Kansas will no longer be allowed to compete on sports teams from kindergarten through college consistent with their gender, after state lawmakers on Wednesday overrode a veto from their governor to enact the restriction."
Again with the newspeak. By identifying males as "transgender women and girls" is again CNN pushing the nonsense. Men have never been allowed to compete in women's sporting events. Using the New Euphemism(tm) changes nothing. What the law does is make that known fact explicit. Unfortunately such nonsense laws have to be passed because of these militant trannies who will do anything, including murdering children, to get everyone else to affirm their delusion.
Yes, murder children. Know exactly what you're dealing with.
Everyone knows that women's sporting events is not a "gender" in the way CNN is trying to position it. This is the "gender is not sex" argument that the left has successfully used as a wedge to separate people from the fact that 99.9% of the time gender *equals* sex. Everyone knows that women's sports exists precisely because women get trounced when they compete against men and therefore would NEVER win any sporting competition where men are allowed.
" “It won’t increase any test scores. It won’t help any kids read or write. It won’t help any teachers prepare our kids for the real world. Here’s what this bill would actually do: harm the mental health of our students,” she said."
She can say whatever she wants to. The students who are not trannies are fine mentally. The trannies are sick in the head and they need professional help rather than being allowed to ruin women's sports.
Advocates of such measures have argued that transgender women and girls have physical advantages over cisgender women and girls in sports. But a 2017 report in the journal Sports Medicine that reviewed several related studies found “no direct or consistent research” on trans people having an athletic advantage over their cisgender peers, and critics say this legislation adds to the discrimination that trans people face, particularly trans youth.
The above is an example of why I no longer trust academia and medicine. During COVID we saw that journals actually published junk reports with specific political purposes (ie: kill alternatives to any supposed "vaccine" so that EUAs could be granted). For sport, there is no need for "consistent research". All you need to do is look at the olympic games. Any and all of them. Women are consistently outperformed by their male teammates. In many cases the slowest male athelete in an event is *faster* than the slowest female in an event. If you need any other proof look below:
Alyson Felix gets completely crushed by a male runner representing Poland. He even starts behind her.
Every time some goofball talks about there is no advantage, you show them this clip. It is a known tactic in this race for slower teams to put a male in with the women in order to see if they can get an advantage.
So any so called "scientific journal" that says that it finds no advantage to males is absolute junk and should be shut down and any references to it in any paper ought to be stricken.
Last week, Kentucky’s legislature overrode its Democratic governor’s veto of a bill that places bans on gender-affirming care for minors, on discussions of sexual orientation or gender identity in school, and on transgender students using bathrooms that align with their gender identity. The move comes after state lawmakers last year overrode another veto by the governor to enact its own anti-trans sports ban.
There is no such thing as "gender-affirming care". Do not ever use this term. Any time someone uses this term you should say: :" you mean double mastectomies" and castration". And don't say it like your asking a question. It's a fact, state it as such. "gender affirming care" is another euphemism used to lull the public into complacency. It sounds "caring". It sounds "reasonable". It is not. Call it what it is.
I cannot believe I've lived long enough to see liberals go from condemning FGM in Africa and Arabia (that's female genital mutilation which involves the removal of the clitoris and in some cases, sewing the entrance to the vagina shut with only enough space to allow for urination and menstrual flow), to promoting double mastectomies, FGM and MGM for minors.
CNN has let you know where they stand. They are onboard and their use of the newspeak shows it.
