Integration revisited
A while back I disagreed with Tim Wise's assessment that blacks do not want to live in so called "segregated" neighborhoods. Unlike most people I know who know Tim Wise' work, I don't give him a free ride just because he happens to get a lot of things right. The Black Commentator published a piece by Mr. Wise Entitled "Ghetto's Are Not a Game" in which he stated:
While only 10 percent of blacks say they prefer to live in all or nearly-all black neighborhoods, roughly three-fourths of African Americans actually live in such places, not because of choice so much as unequal access to housing markets.
According to several studies, blacks generally prefer well-mixed, integrated neighborhoods. It is whites, who by preferring no more than 10-15 percent people of color in their communities, effectively block such an arrangement from coming about. After all, if “too many” blacks or Latinos move in, whites begin to sell en masse, which means a net outflow of capital and thus falling property values, which results in more low-income persons gaining access to the area, and the eventual “tipping” of the neighborhood from mostly white to mostly of color, and poor. It is, in many ways, an ever-expanding, but nonetheless vicious circle of de facto race and class segregation.
I argued that the statistic regearding only 10% of blacks wishing to live in all black neighborhoods was way off mark. The reason I made this claim was because I know that many blacks lie to pollsters in order to not appear "racist" or to uphold "the dream." In a letter to the editor I pointed out that what most blacks would prefer is a majority black neighborhood with clean, well paved streets, more than decent grocery stores and other such quality of life items. Today I ran across an article in the Christian Science Monitor entitled: "After years in the suburbs, many blacks return to city life", that states that many blacks who live in suburbs are considering moving back into inner cities and largely black neighborhoods.
quote:
The trend - confirmed by real-estate agents, architects, community activists, and families clamoring to move in - is also clear in the numbers. Stephen Klineberg, a sociology professor at Rice University who does an annual survey of attitudes in Houston, found that last year 17 percent of African-American suburbanites polled said they were "very interested" in moving back into the city, compared with only 3.7 percent of whites suburbanites...
...But that's where it gets complex, says sociologist Monique Taylor, whose recent book, "Harlem between Heaven and Hell," looks at the trend of middle-class blacks returning to that neighborhood in the 1990s.
She found that longtime residents soon realized yuppies are yuppies, whatever their race. The conflicts grew, she says, as recent arrivals insisted on changes in the way public and communal space was used - angering longtime residents by, among other things, passing laws that prohibit loitering and public urination.
"Those African-Americans, who were coming into Harlem to 'be down' with the community, had to accept the idea that their interests were at odds with how the community worked," she says. "They had to really rethink: 'This is who I am and this is why I'm here.' "
You'll note that this study found 17 percent of suburban "Spot in the Milk" Blacks strongly interested in moving back to black neighborhoods. Almost double the statistic that Tim Wise quoted in his piece. This clearly underscored the correctness of my postion that the statistics concerning the assertion that blacks do not want to be in majority black neighborhoods. Secondly, my position that the issues surrounding black removal from majority black neighborhoods are those of "quality of life" are also addressed by this article.
Again I must say that we must be very carefull about the cart-blanch we give others to make cases for us that we ought to be making for ourselves.
Links:
http://www.blackcommentator.com/61/61_ghettos2.htm
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0429/p01s02-ussc.html
(17 years of informed commentary)
Thursday, April 29, 2004
Tuesday, April 27, 2004
The Mental Dangers of Racism
By Divine providence I was to see a link on my own very blog to a Healthnet which is so brief I'll just repost the entire thing here:
Racism Really Does Make You Stupid
Prejudice can diminish mental abilities, study finds
by Robert Preidt | May 08 '03
THURSDAY, May 8 (HealthDayNews) -- People who are racist may suffer a temporary lapse in mental capacity after interacting with people who are members of a racial minority.
Researchers from Princeton University and Dartmouth College found that white people with a high degree of racial basis experienced a decrease in "executive function" after spending time talking with black people. Their research appears in the May issue of Psychological Science.
Executive function is a key element of thought that involves the ability to fix attention on certain, high-level mental tasks.
The study included 59 white college students. They were given a test to assess the degree of racial bias in their thinking. The students then spent time talking with either a black or a white person and afterwards were given a test that measured their ability to concentrate on a challenging mental task.
The more racially biased the students were, the worse they did on the mental task after speaking with a black person. But racially biased students who spoke with a white person, even if they discussed racially sensitive issues, had no decline in mental function.
"When you have to control your behavior, it takes a lot of energy. And if you expend energy in a social interaction, then you don't have so much left over to do something else," researcher Nicole Shelton says in a news release
This is why I advise black people, who as a result of knowledge of the massive ugliness that have been visited upon Black people, to move to an emotionally detatched state on the issue ASAP. It took me a while to understand why Professor Fluker, of Tuskegee University was so adamant about people "Checking thier emotions at the door." When one emotively engages in the work of ending WS, one compromises ones ability to think clearly.
By Divine providence I was to see a link on my own very blog to a Healthnet which is so brief I'll just repost the entire thing here:
Racism Really Does Make You Stupid
Prejudice can diminish mental abilities, study finds
by Robert Preidt | May 08 '03
THURSDAY, May 8 (HealthDayNews) -- People who are racist may suffer a temporary lapse in mental capacity after interacting with people who are members of a racial minority.
Researchers from Princeton University and Dartmouth College found that white people with a high degree of racial basis experienced a decrease in "executive function" after spending time talking with black people. Their research appears in the May issue of Psychological Science.
Executive function is a key element of thought that involves the ability to fix attention on certain, high-level mental tasks.
The study included 59 white college students. They were given a test to assess the degree of racial bias in their thinking. The students then spent time talking with either a black or a white person and afterwards were given a test that measured their ability to concentrate on a challenging mental task.
The more racially biased the students were, the worse they did on the mental task after speaking with a black person. But racially biased students who spoke with a white person, even if they discussed racially sensitive issues, had no decline in mental function.
"When you have to control your behavior, it takes a lot of energy. And if you expend energy in a social interaction, then you don't have so much left over to do something else," researcher Nicole Shelton says in a news release
This is why I advise black people, who as a result of knowledge of the massive ugliness that have been visited upon Black people, to move to an emotionally detatched state on the issue ASAP. It took me a while to understand why Professor Fluker, of Tuskegee University was so adamant about people "Checking thier emotions at the door." When one emotively engages in the work of ending WS, one compromises ones ability to think clearly.
Libya
I told people earlier that when the Bush Administration claimed that the invasion or Iraq was what motivated Ghadafi to surrender "Weapons of Mass Destruction" that the claim was completely false.Ghadafi, by my estimates was at a point where the economic sanctions from both Europe and the United States was putting a stranglehold on Libya's economy. furthermore, with an aging military and the death of his daughter. Ghadaffi realized that military confrontation with both Europe and the United States was impossible, especially with the utter lack of support from the oft loud mouthed but rarely active Arab leaders to his east. Thus Libya had moved into modernization and economics big time while pushing for a more unified Africa (past issues with African states aside). Indeed his involvement with the OAU was probably as much of a wake up call. To watch 'leaders" to the south all under the economic stranglehold of the World Bank and the IMF must have been equally alarming. Surely then, given the prospect of being raped by those institutions or giving up some outdated Chemical agents and a couple of Libyan citizens was an easy choice. Such a move would also put Ghadafi on the side of World opinion regearding US global action. Once Libya resolved it's outstanding issues with Europe and the US these nations and organizations would either have to make good on thier promises or risk being seen as hypocrites. USA Today has a nice article that proves my position that Ghadafi was in fact attempting to change its global situation long before the Iraq war.
quote:
But the story of Gadhafi's long road to rehabilitation is more complex. Interviews with a half-dozen current and former U.S. officials, Libya experts and a Libyan-American close to Gadhafi's family show that Libya began discussing giving up weapons of mass destruction in 1992, when its arsenal was rudimentary. And it may have bought nuclear technology just to have something to give up in final negotiations.
"Gadhafi felt that the Americans wanted some more to get them interested, so he put some more on the table," says Mohammed Bukhres, a Libyan-American with close ties to Gadhafi's sons. "We tried for a long time to get relations with the United States. Don't let anyone tell you it's because of the invasion of Iraq."
Another article demostrates how now Europe is trying to not live up to their obligations to libya by introducing new conditions;
quote:
German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer welcomed Libya's rapprochement Monday but noted "obstacles" remained, including his government's demand for compensation from Libya for victims of the 1986 bombing at a West Berlin disco that was a hangout for American troops.
Two U.S. soldiers and a Turkish woman were killed and 229 people injured in the attack allegedly ordered by Gadhafi.
EU officials said they also would raise the case of six Bulgarian medics detained in Tripoli since 1999 on charges that they deliberately infected hundreds of children with the AIDS virus."
EU and Belgian officials said human rights would be raised in the context of Libya's aspiration to join the Euro-Mediterranean partnership. The application will have to be approved by EU governments.
One should note that China has been reported to have numerous Human Rights violations and yet enjoy "normal" relations with both Europe and America. Furthermore; Libya has the right to try anyone of any nationality that is accused of a crime in it's jurisdiction. Let Europe suspend ties to the US over the persons now locked up on Guantanamo with no legal rights whatsoever. Of course such a thing will not happen because, as libya knows and is trying to remedy: Cash and/or Arms rule.
Links:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2004-04-27-libya_x.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2004-04-26-libya_x.htm
I told people earlier that when the Bush Administration claimed that the invasion or Iraq was what motivated Ghadafi to surrender "Weapons of Mass Destruction" that the claim was completely false.Ghadafi, by my estimates was at a point where the economic sanctions from both Europe and the United States was putting a stranglehold on Libya's economy. furthermore, with an aging military and the death of his daughter. Ghadaffi realized that military confrontation with both Europe and the United States was impossible, especially with the utter lack of support from the oft loud mouthed but rarely active Arab leaders to his east. Thus Libya had moved into modernization and economics big time while pushing for a more unified Africa (past issues with African states aside). Indeed his involvement with the OAU was probably as much of a wake up call. To watch 'leaders" to the south all under the economic stranglehold of the World Bank and the IMF must have been equally alarming. Surely then, given the prospect of being raped by those institutions or giving up some outdated Chemical agents and a couple of Libyan citizens was an easy choice. Such a move would also put Ghadafi on the side of World opinion regearding US global action. Once Libya resolved it's outstanding issues with Europe and the US these nations and organizations would either have to make good on thier promises or risk being seen as hypocrites. USA Today has a nice article that proves my position that Ghadafi was in fact attempting to change its global situation long before the Iraq war.
quote:
But the story of Gadhafi's long road to rehabilitation is more complex. Interviews with a half-dozen current and former U.S. officials, Libya experts and a Libyan-American close to Gadhafi's family show that Libya began discussing giving up weapons of mass destruction in 1992, when its arsenal was rudimentary. And it may have bought nuclear technology just to have something to give up in final negotiations.
"Gadhafi felt that the Americans wanted some more to get them interested, so he put some more on the table," says Mohammed Bukhres, a Libyan-American with close ties to Gadhafi's sons. "We tried for a long time to get relations with the United States. Don't let anyone tell you it's because of the invasion of Iraq."
Another article demostrates how now Europe is trying to not live up to their obligations to libya by introducing new conditions;
quote:
German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer welcomed Libya's rapprochement Monday but noted "obstacles" remained, including his government's demand for compensation from Libya for victims of the 1986 bombing at a West Berlin disco that was a hangout for American troops.
Two U.S. soldiers and a Turkish woman were killed and 229 people injured in the attack allegedly ordered by Gadhafi.
EU officials said they also would raise the case of six Bulgarian medics detained in Tripoli since 1999 on charges that they deliberately infected hundreds of children with the AIDS virus."
EU and Belgian officials said human rights would be raised in the context of Libya's aspiration to join the Euro-Mediterranean partnership. The application will have to be approved by EU governments.
One should note that China has been reported to have numerous Human Rights violations and yet enjoy "normal" relations with both Europe and America. Furthermore; Libya has the right to try anyone of any nationality that is accused of a crime in it's jurisdiction. Let Europe suspend ties to the US over the persons now locked up on Guantanamo with no legal rights whatsoever. Of course such a thing will not happen because, as libya knows and is trying to remedy: Cash and/or Arms rule.
Links:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2004-04-27-libya_x.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2004-04-26-libya_x.htm
Monday, April 26, 2004
Is Kerry as Dumb as Bush?
I've recently surmised that the Democratic Party has been infliltrated by Republicans who are doing all they can to tank the party. Either that or the Democrats are just plain stupid. This morning on Good Morning America, Kerry attempted to answer the charge that he threw away his medals in protest against the Vietnam war. The Bush machine has been trying to paint kerry as an equivocating liberal. Given kerry's show this morning they don't need to do much in this department. Kerry is on a video verifying to an interviewer that he did in fact throw away some medals or ribbons and has gone on record a number of times saying that he threw away some veteran friends medals. This morning he went on to explain the difference between "medals" and 'ribbons" and then proceeded to complain about Bush. All n all he sounded like a teenager that had been busted with his pops stack of Porn. I cannot believe for one minute that his press people allowed Kerry to wing this or worse prepared kerry to answer the question in the way that he did. Here is what Kerry should have said:
"Good morning Charlie. Let me get right to the point of this non-issue. I served my country in Vietnam. I came back and discovered that this war was wrong and I took a stand. I respect every soldier that served his country in an honorable manner in that war and will, as president make sure that America takes care of them. However, I stand by my condemnation of the Vietnam war and make no apology for standing for my principles. You should ask Mr. Bush about his service. Thank you and good day."
With that one statement Kerry would have diffused the situation without giving the republicans a sound bite of " Yes I threw my medals away." He would have retained the support of war veterans. He would have come across as having a backbone and would have turned the tables back on Bush.
I've recently surmised that the Democratic Party has been infliltrated by Republicans who are doing all they can to tank the party. Either that or the Democrats are just plain stupid. This morning on Good Morning America, Kerry attempted to answer the charge that he threw away his medals in protest against the Vietnam war. The Bush machine has been trying to paint kerry as an equivocating liberal. Given kerry's show this morning they don't need to do much in this department. Kerry is on a video verifying to an interviewer that he did in fact throw away some medals or ribbons and has gone on record a number of times saying that he threw away some veteran friends medals. This morning he went on to explain the difference between "medals" and 'ribbons" and then proceeded to complain about Bush. All n all he sounded like a teenager that had been busted with his pops stack of Porn. I cannot believe for one minute that his press people allowed Kerry to wing this or worse prepared kerry to answer the question in the way that he did. Here is what Kerry should have said:
"Good morning Charlie. Let me get right to the point of this non-issue. I served my country in Vietnam. I came back and discovered that this war was wrong and I took a stand. I respect every soldier that served his country in an honorable manner in that war and will, as president make sure that America takes care of them. However, I stand by my condemnation of the Vietnam war and make no apology for standing for my principles. You should ask Mr. Bush about his service. Thank you and good day."
With that one statement Kerry would have diffused the situation without giving the republicans a sound bite of " Yes I threw my medals away." He would have retained the support of war veterans. He would have come across as having a backbone and would have turned the tables back on Bush.
Wednesday, April 21, 2004
Brown V. Board
Brown V. Board
When i graduated from Tuskegee I was full of youthful fire and zeal to let everybody know that I knew everything. I soon learned that i did not know everything. During this time I happened to stumble across a "desegregation" issue that had engulfed the Englewood Nj School system. At that time Dwight Morrow High, was ( and is) predominantly black and so called "Latino." It was widely known that white parents, and blacks that could afford it and felt so moved, paid to have their children go to High School in the neighboring town Tenafly. The town of Englewood under a supposed mandate to desegregate Dwight Morrow called a meeting. I attended this meeting intent on letting it be known that the Brown V. Board case contained very offensive suppositions about black people and that what Dwight Morrow ought to be concerned with was the schools access to proper teaching materials, proper salaries for teachers and a demanding curriculum. I was dismayed to find that one had to sign up before hand to speak so I was relegated to my seat for the duration of the meeting. Fortunately, a group of local pastors gave voice to my idea.
The specific issue with Brown V. was that the majority decision includes a passage that says that Black students by being in separate facilities than whites would develop feelings of inferiority and thus needed to be in contact with white students in order to be properly socialised and educated. Mind you, no one asked whether or not white students have feelings of inferiority because they did not come into contact with black students. Also if one talks to persons who have gone to segregated schools you will find that a great many of them were quite well adjusted even if they believed that the facilities were sub-optimal.
Indeed if one looks at the statistics one would find that a great majority of Black professionals were the product of "segregated" schools such as Tuskegee, Morehouse and Spellman. If this is so, then clearly "segregated" environments are positive for blacks so long as such environments provide educational and cultural support.
Today I ran across an article regarding a presentation given by Derrick Bell, where he flatly states that Brown V. damaged the educational prospects of many Black youths. I tend to agree with him. While middle class blacks have been able to take flight from "segregated" and underfunded schools, at least 30% of blacks live at or below poverty levels, these individuals have not benefitted from school desegregation.
Quote:
"From the standpoint of education, we would have been better served had the court in Brown rejected the petitioners' arguments to overrule Plessy v. Ferguson," Bell said, referring to the 1896 Supreme Court ruling that enforced a "separate but equal" standard for blacks and whites. While acknowledging the deep injustices done to black children in segregated schools, Bell argued the court should have determined to enforce the generally ignored "equal" part of the "separate but equal" doctrine.
Rather than resolving the nation's racial dilemma, the Brown decision has made it more complex, Bell argued. "Racial disparities, wide and widening in every measure of well-being, overshadow the gains in status achieved by those of us black Americans who, by varying combinations of hard work and good fortune, are viewed as having 'made it,'" he said.....
...Instead, what Brown did for many African Americans was legitimate the status quo. While they remained poor and disempowered, their status was no longer a result of denied equality. Rather, Bell said, it marked a personal failure to take advantage of one's defined equal status.
Thursday, April 15, 2004
About Those Civilians
Granma International has reported that some of the "contractors" in Iraq, a nice name for mercenary, are former Chilian ex-commandos and members of the South African secret police un der the Aparthied regime:
quote:
The article went on to say that apparently Blackwater was unable to contract a sufficient number of U.S. nationals – the majority of them former soldiers – for all its postings in Iraq and had started to use former Chilean soldiers who were active during Augusto Pinochet’s regime.
The South African press indicated that the dead guard was one Francois Strydom, a former member of the notorious Koevoet counterinsurgency group, implicated in numerous political murders in Namibia during the 1980s.
La Jornada refers to the Tiger Force unit from the 101st Airborne Division that was deployed in Viet Nam to assassinate guerrillas and civilian sympathizers.
More Phoenix operations. Same ole same ole.
Links:
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/abril/juev8/16mercenarios.html
Granma International has reported that some of the "contractors" in Iraq, a nice name for mercenary, are former Chilian ex-commandos and members of the South African secret police un der the Aparthied regime:
quote:
The article went on to say that apparently Blackwater was unable to contract a sufficient number of U.S. nationals – the majority of them former soldiers – for all its postings in Iraq and had started to use former Chilean soldiers who were active during Augusto Pinochet’s regime.
The South African press indicated that the dead guard was one Francois Strydom, a former member of the notorious Koevoet counterinsurgency group, implicated in numerous political murders in Namibia during the 1980s.
La Jornada refers to the Tiger Force unit from the 101st Airborne Division that was deployed in Viet Nam to assassinate guerrillas and civilian sympathizers.
More Phoenix operations. Same ole same ole.
Links:
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/abril/juev8/16mercenarios.html
The Power of Propaganda
When I was at Tuskegee, an organization to which I belonged required potential members to go through an "orientation" session. One of the purposes of this session was to make sure that all the members had the same baseline knowledge of the subject matter we dealt with and to wean out those who weren't really in agreement with our principals. One of the things we dealt with was the use of propaganda. One thing we stressed was that regeardless to who in the organization was spoken to, any person inquiring about the organization or it's stand on a particular subject would get the same answer. No permutations were allowed, no "personally.." just the standard line. Some people could not understand why we did this or why we were so peculiar about how we presented ourselves to the public. But we knew that a consistent and persistent image and message was essential to further our agenda.
Today I ran across an article at Alternet entitled: How the Democrats were Betamaxed It is an excellent essay on the power of propaganda. I don't particularly care for Democrats, but I believe that for any reader that is serious about ending Global White Supremacy, this is an important read. This piece also adds evidence to the correctness of Dr. Welsing's definition of "racism" as we covered at the beginning of this blog as well as the issues of apparently unrelated phenomenon actually being related.
quote:
Republicans also understand the value of strategic communications and the importance of "naming and framing" legislation and policies. Naming and framing can turn the "estate tax" ("estate" sounds like it only applies to rich folks) into a "death tax" – we all die and it just doesn't seem right taxing the dead. When the GOP renamed the estate tax the death tax, they were able to frame it as a mainstream concern with 75% of Americans supporting its repeal, even though the estate tax does only apply to the rich, and it's paid by less than 2% of Americans.
They name legislation "No Child Left Behind," "Healthy Forests," "Clear Skies" and "Patriot Act," essentially forcing legislators to support their bills, lest they be accused of leaving children behind, favoring polluted forests and skies, or being branded as unpatriotic. It's sheer genius. It makes Microsoft's tactics for marketplace dominance look like child's play.
Another vital aspect of marketing is placement, or controlling the distribution channels. Republicans took this a step further by largely replicating Ted Turner's strategy of vertical integration of content and distribution. Cable maverick Turner recognized that he could become a formidable media force by owing both the channels of distribution – his TBS cable network – and content. So, he bought sports teams, acquired the MGM classic movie library and invented the 24-hour news network CNN to fill his cable channels.
Using this same vertical integration model, conservative think tanks and foundations, like the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute, have been laboring intensively on the research and development of conservative policies, as well as their packaging in media-friendly ways. These policies provide the "content" to feed to three primary distribution channels: legislative distribution channels including elected officials, candidates, senior staff, and political appointees; judicial distribution channels; and various mainstream and dedicated media distribution channels, such as Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, the Washington Times, et al.
Links:
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18395
When I was at Tuskegee, an organization to which I belonged required potential members to go through an "orientation" session. One of the purposes of this session was to make sure that all the members had the same baseline knowledge of the subject matter we dealt with and to wean out those who weren't really in agreement with our principals. One of the things we dealt with was the use of propaganda. One thing we stressed was that regeardless to who in the organization was spoken to, any person inquiring about the organization or it's stand on a particular subject would get the same answer. No permutations were allowed, no "personally.." just the standard line. Some people could not understand why we did this or why we were so peculiar about how we presented ourselves to the public. But we knew that a consistent and persistent image and message was essential to further our agenda.
Today I ran across an article at Alternet entitled: How the Democrats were Betamaxed It is an excellent essay on the power of propaganda. I don't particularly care for Democrats, but I believe that for any reader that is serious about ending Global White Supremacy, this is an important read. This piece also adds evidence to the correctness of Dr. Welsing's definition of "racism" as we covered at the beginning of this blog as well as the issues of apparently unrelated phenomenon actually being related.
quote:
Republicans also understand the value of strategic communications and the importance of "naming and framing" legislation and policies. Naming and framing can turn the "estate tax" ("estate" sounds like it only applies to rich folks) into a "death tax" – we all die and it just doesn't seem right taxing the dead. When the GOP renamed the estate tax the death tax, they were able to frame it as a mainstream concern with 75% of Americans supporting its repeal, even though the estate tax does only apply to the rich, and it's paid by less than 2% of Americans.
They name legislation "No Child Left Behind," "Healthy Forests," "Clear Skies" and "Patriot Act," essentially forcing legislators to support their bills, lest they be accused of leaving children behind, favoring polluted forests and skies, or being branded as unpatriotic. It's sheer genius. It makes Microsoft's tactics for marketplace dominance look like child's play.
Another vital aspect of marketing is placement, or controlling the distribution channels. Republicans took this a step further by largely replicating Ted Turner's strategy of vertical integration of content and distribution. Cable maverick Turner recognized that he could become a formidable media force by owing both the channels of distribution – his TBS cable network – and content. So, he bought sports teams, acquired the MGM classic movie library and invented the 24-hour news network CNN to fill his cable channels.
Using this same vertical integration model, conservative think tanks and foundations, like the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute, have been laboring intensively on the research and development of conservative policies, as well as their packaging in media-friendly ways. These policies provide the "content" to feed to three primary distribution channels: legislative distribution channels including elected officials, candidates, senior staff, and political appointees; judicial distribution channels; and various mainstream and dedicated media distribution channels, such as Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, the Washington Times, et al.
Links:
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18395
Wednesday, April 14, 2004
A Jewish Conspiracy
There's a lot of talk about Black-Jewish relations and the supposed rise in Anti-Semitism in the AA community, specifically in the more "educated" portions of the AA community. Such So called "Anti-semitism," Itself a gross misnomer, is the result of the fact that we, educated blacks, can read and know when Jewish people, or specifically Jewish organizations, step into our business and manipulate our so called leadership. The most recent glaring example of this was the ouster of Cynthia McKinney from her Congressional seat by Denise Majette. Majette won largely due to cross over votes and heavy backing by jewish people. This was discussed in my February 7th, 2004 commentary entitled How Jews Run This where I heavily quoted a SF Bay article that demonstrated, with undeniable facts, how Jewish Organizations have influenced Black political figures.
On April 9th the Atlanta Jewish Times Posted an article on how the Jewish Community "worked tirelessly to elect Democratic US Rep. Denise Majette to office in 2002."
Quote:
It is a sentiment that has echoed widely in the days since March 29, when Majette amazed even her own staff in announcing her intention to run.
Among her many Jewish supporters, some have expressed anger, disappointment and confusion over her decision.
“I’m surprised,” said Larry Cooper, an oncologist who helped raise funds for Majette during her successful 2002 campaign to unseat 10-year Democratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney. “I frequently talk to her. I had no hint that this was coming down the pike.”
“I’m in shock,” added Steven Wertheim, an orthopedist who along with his wife Melinda hosted several fundraisers for Majette at their home in 2002. “I was given no advance notice.”
Wertheim, who calls Majette’s decision an “obvious misstep,” says people who this year have contributed money to what they believed would be her 2004 House re-election bid may now ask Majette for their money back.
“I think there will be a lot of people who do so,” he said.
Knowledgeable sources confirm that some Jewish supporters have already called Majette’s 4th District congressional office in Decatur demanding their money back.
Answering their concern, Majette told The Jewish Times, “It was not my intention to deceive anyone. I have honored my commitments. I have addressed Jewish concerns.
“Those who supported me will continue to have a voice in the Senate,” she continued. “I hope they will give me the opportunity to serve [there].”
Did I read that right? Apparently we have confirmation that Denise Majette was bought by the Jewish Lobby.
Some one needs to make a poster quick. Denise Majettes face with a big Negro for Sale sign on it.
Links:
http://atlanta.jewish.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=603
There's a lot of talk about Black-Jewish relations and the supposed rise in Anti-Semitism in the AA community, specifically in the more "educated" portions of the AA community. Such So called "Anti-semitism," Itself a gross misnomer, is the result of the fact that we, educated blacks, can read and know when Jewish people, or specifically Jewish organizations, step into our business and manipulate our so called leadership. The most recent glaring example of this was the ouster of Cynthia McKinney from her Congressional seat by Denise Majette. Majette won largely due to cross over votes and heavy backing by jewish people. This was discussed in my February 7th, 2004 commentary entitled How Jews Run This where I heavily quoted a SF Bay article that demonstrated, with undeniable facts, how Jewish Organizations have influenced Black political figures.
On April 9th the Atlanta Jewish Times Posted an article on how the Jewish Community "worked tirelessly to elect Democratic US Rep. Denise Majette to office in 2002."
Quote:
It is a sentiment that has echoed widely in the days since March 29, when Majette amazed even her own staff in announcing her intention to run.
Among her many Jewish supporters, some have expressed anger, disappointment and confusion over her decision.
“I’m surprised,” said Larry Cooper, an oncologist who helped raise funds for Majette during her successful 2002 campaign to unseat 10-year Democratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney. “I frequently talk to her. I had no hint that this was coming down the pike.”
“I’m in shock,” added Steven Wertheim, an orthopedist who along with his wife Melinda hosted several fundraisers for Majette at their home in 2002. “I was given no advance notice.”
Wertheim, who calls Majette’s decision an “obvious misstep,” says people who this year have contributed money to what they believed would be her 2004 House re-election bid may now ask Majette for their money back.
“I think there will be a lot of people who do so,” he said.
Knowledgeable sources confirm that some Jewish supporters have already called Majette’s 4th District congressional office in Decatur demanding their money back.
Answering their concern, Majette told The Jewish Times, “It was not my intention to deceive anyone. I have honored my commitments. I have addressed Jewish concerns.
“Those who supported me will continue to have a voice in the Senate,” she continued. “I hope they will give me the opportunity to serve [there].”
Did I read that right? Apparently we have confirmation that Denise Majette was bought by the Jewish Lobby.
Some one needs to make a poster quick. Denise Majettes face with a big Negro for Sale sign on it.
Links:
http://atlanta.jewish.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=603
Friday, April 02, 2004
More Axe
There's a Bob Marley collection where the song 'Small Axe" is accompanied by a track "More Axe." I just read a story that definitely qualifies as "more axe." The Indepepended UK quotes one Sibel Edmonds who worked as a translator for the FBI:
quote:
A former translator for the FBI with top-secret security clearance says she has provided information to the panel investigating the 11 September attacks which proves senior officials knew of al-Qa'ida's plans to attack the US with aircraft months before the strikes happened.
She said the claim by the National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, that there was no such information was "an outrageous lie".
Sibel Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed session with the commission's investigators providing information that was circulating within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting that an attack using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists were in place. The Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to silence her and has obtained a gagging order from a court by citing the rarely used "state secrets privilege".
Heads must roll.
Links:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=507514
There's a Bob Marley collection where the song 'Small Axe" is accompanied by a track "More Axe." I just read a story that definitely qualifies as "more axe." The Indepepended UK quotes one Sibel Edmonds who worked as a translator for the FBI:
quote:
A former translator for the FBI with top-secret security clearance says she has provided information to the panel investigating the 11 September attacks which proves senior officials knew of al-Qa'ida's plans to attack the US with aircraft months before the strikes happened.
She said the claim by the National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, that there was no such information was "an outrageous lie".
Sibel Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed session with the commission's investigators providing information that was circulating within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting that an attack using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists were in place. The Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to silence her and has obtained a gagging order from a court by citing the rarely used "state secrets privilege".
Heads must roll.
Links:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=507514
Thursday, April 01, 2004
The Truth Comes in Dribbles
I usually never have to wait for "official" sources to know when the US has it's foot in something. In regards to Haiti the white faces, the perfect American English and the well armed rebels had "outside influence' written all over it. Today I stumbled across this piece at Granma International which reports that the "rebels' were funded by the US and trained in the Dominican Republic.
Quote:
SANTO DOMINGO.— The Xinhua news agency has reported that the groups which rose up against Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide were armed and trained by the United States in the Dominican Republic, according to a preliminary report presented today.
That statement is the provisional conclusion by the Haiti Investigation Committee made up of religious and legal representatives from several different countries and created in 1991 by former U.S. Justice Secretary Ramsey Clark.
"Two hundred soldiers from the U.S. Special Forces arrived in the Dominican Republic with the authorization of President Hipólito MejÃa as part of a military operation to train Haitian rebels," revealed the report that was circulated in the Dominican capital, Santo Domingo.
This Bush Klan is really up on some illegal ish. I do hope that whenever he is put out of office that the someone manages to convict these people for thier crimes.
links:
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/marzo/mier31/14haiti.html
I usually never have to wait for "official" sources to know when the US has it's foot in something. In regards to Haiti the white faces, the perfect American English and the well armed rebels had "outside influence' written all over it. Today I stumbled across this piece at Granma International which reports that the "rebels' were funded by the US and trained in the Dominican Republic.
Quote:
SANTO DOMINGO.— The Xinhua news agency has reported that the groups which rose up against Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide were armed and trained by the United States in the Dominican Republic, according to a preliminary report presented today.
That statement is the provisional conclusion by the Haiti Investigation Committee made up of religious and legal representatives from several different countries and created in 1991 by former U.S. Justice Secretary Ramsey Clark.
"Two hundred soldiers from the U.S. Special Forces arrived in the Dominican Republic with the authorization of President Hipólito MejÃa as part of a military operation to train Haitian rebels," revealed the report that was circulated in the Dominican capital, Santo Domingo.
This Bush Klan is really up on some illegal ish. I do hope that whenever he is put out of office that the someone manages to convict these people for thier crimes.
links:
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/marzo/mier31/14haiti.html
Tuesday, March 30, 2004
Like Minds
A nice article appeared on the CounterPunch site. It covers the conviction of three men for essentially playing paintball. you can read it here:
http://www.counterpunch.org/cassel03272004.html
quote:
According to a report in a June 28, 2003 Washington Post article, Michael E. Rolince, in charge of the Washington FBI field office, conceded that the government had no evidence of specific plots against U.S. targets at home or abroad. "A lot of this is about preemption," he said.
A lot? How about the entire case? And since when is "preemptive" prosecution constitutional? Apparently, when you are a Muslim in post-September 11-America.
This, my friends is dangerous legal president. These individuals did nothing illegal and broke no laws. They cannot even be had on RICO laws.
A nice article appeared on the CounterPunch site. It covers the conviction of three men for essentially playing paintball. you can read it here:
http://www.counterpunch.org/cassel03272004.html
quote:
According to a report in a June 28, 2003 Washington Post article, Michael E. Rolince, in charge of the Washington FBI field office, conceded that the government had no evidence of specific plots against U.S. targets at home or abroad. "A lot of this is about preemption," he said.
A lot? How about the entire case? And since when is "preemptive" prosecution constitutional? Apparently, when you are a Muslim in post-September 11-America.
This, my friends is dangerous legal president. These individuals did nothing illegal and broke no laws. They cannot even be had on RICO laws.
Monday, March 29, 2004
Vaccines Against Survival
I was perusing a chat site and ran across this article Where it has been found that Polio vaccines used in Nigeria had been contaminated with a sterilization chemical.
quote:
UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents Scientist Finds Scientist says things discovered in vaccines are "harmful, toxic"
KADUNA, Nigeria, March 11, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria's youth against polio may have been a front for sterilizing the nation. Dr. Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, took samples of the vaccine to labs in India for analysis.
Using WHO-recommended technologies like Gas Chromatography (GC) and Radio-Immuno assay, Dr. Kaita, upon analysis, found evidence of serious contamination. "Some of the things we discovered in the vaccines are harmful, toxic; some have direct effects on the human reproductive system," he said in an interview with Kaduna's Weekly Trust. "I and some other professional colleagues who are Indians who were in the Lab could not believe the discovery," he said.
and what's worse:
This is not the first time UNICEF has been embroiled in a controversy over sterilizing agents in vaccines.
LifeSiteNews.com reported that in 1995, the Catholic Women's League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG, which when given in a vaccine permanently causes women to be unable to sustain a pregnancy. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.
Now about those supposed HIV medications.....
Links:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/mar/04031101.htmlM
I was perusing a chat site and ran across this article Where it has been found that Polio vaccines used in Nigeria had been contaminated with a sterilization chemical.
quote:
UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents Scientist Finds Scientist says things discovered in vaccines are "harmful, toxic"
KADUNA, Nigeria, March 11, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria's youth against polio may have been a front for sterilizing the nation. Dr. Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, took samples of the vaccine to labs in India for analysis.
Using WHO-recommended technologies like Gas Chromatography (GC) and Radio-Immuno assay, Dr. Kaita, upon analysis, found evidence of serious contamination. "Some of the things we discovered in the vaccines are harmful, toxic; some have direct effects on the human reproductive system," he said in an interview with Kaduna's Weekly Trust. "I and some other professional colleagues who are Indians who were in the Lab could not believe the discovery," he said.
and what's worse:
This is not the first time UNICEF has been embroiled in a controversy over sterilizing agents in vaccines.
LifeSiteNews.com reported that in 1995, the Catholic Women's League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG, which when given in a vaccine permanently causes women to be unable to sustain a pregnancy. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.
Now about those supposed HIV medications.....
Links:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/mar/04031101.htmlM
Sunday, March 28, 2004
Booker T and Garvey redeemed
In the past two weeks or so there have been various reports regarding the unemployment level of blacks in NYC. Apparently the stats show a rate of 49% unemployment among black men and 43% unemployment among black females. A New York Times article entitled: Nearly Half of [New York City] Black Men Found Jobless written by Janny Scott gave the following statistic:
Mark Levitan, the report's author, found that just 51.8 percent of black men ages 16 to 64 held jobs in New York City in 2003. The rate for white men was 75.7 percent; for Hispanic men, 65.7; and for black women, 57.1. The employment-population ratio for black men was the lowest for the period Mr. Levitan has studied, which goes back to 1979.
"We're left with a very big question,'' Mr. Levitan, a senior policy analyst with the society, said in an interview. "As the economy recovers, will we see a rise in employment among black men in tandem with the rise in employment of city residents generally? In other words, is this fundamentally a cyclical problem or is it more deeply structural? I fear that it is more deeply structural."
What I ask the reader to consider is the following pattern. The greater the economic independence of the group the lower their reported unemployment rate. So given that whites in general "run the roost" then their relatively low rate of unemployment is expected. Looking at Hispanics we are forced to look at a few things. In contrast to Blacks (note some Hispanics are black, but for simplicity sake we'll entertain the implied dichotomy), Hispanics have greater economic power than blacks, specifically American born blacks. I specify American born blacks because there is a large and growing population of non-American (as in descendents of those enslaved) blacks who demonstrate similar economic activity as to Hispanics and other non-black immigrants. When one goes into a black community one thing that generally stands out is that the ownership of various businesses are of people who are not of the same racial or ethnic grouping. Laundry by Asians, Gas stations by Indians and Arabs. Pharmacies by Indians or Whites, Fast food places generally owned by whites, Fish markets owned by Asians. Supermarkets are generally owned by whites. American Blacks generally own hair salons and mom-and pop "Soul Food" joints. So there is a discernible pattern that links business ownership and employment. Why does this redeem Booker T Washington and Marcus Garvey?
When I was a youngster I was indoctrinated into believing that although Booker T Washington was "the man" for founding Tuskegee Normal Institute, he was still a sellout for his "accomodationist" views towards whites. Apparently his sin was to tell blacks (and whites) that blacks should forgo politics in favor of developing skills and various industries and building up themselves economically and then moving into politics. This was summed up by his "cast your bucket where you are" story. This view was and continues to be derided by much of the black intelligensia. They favor WEB Dubois' idea that the talented tenth should put social and political pressure on the white establishment to "let them in" and "treat them equally." Of course we now see what the Talented Tenth does when they "get in." Marcus Garvey was also of the opinion that Blacks had to develop industrially to become economically independent of whites. Once they had done so they would be able to demand the political and social respect of whites regardless of what the latter thought personally of them.
Both of these views were uniformly rejected by black "leadership" and "intelligensia." fast forward to today. Blacks who rejected black business and development to "integration" and "political favors" are now facing unemployment at high rates. Manufacturing jobs, or the "steel plantations" are being pushed over seas. The impact is the precipitous drop in family incomes as black men are unable to bring bread to the table. Black farmers, who have been losing land to large white corporations are also the victim of the Talented Tenth, who failed to use their talent to found large black corporations to protect black farmland. So too has the black consumer failed to support black businesses, including banks. This failure, especially virulent after integration, has resulted in the near decimation of black businesses. There are many black businesses today that are more wary of black consumers than white businesses in Jim Crow days.
Now we have Black organizations, such as the NAACP, the Urban League, etc. who now support the idea of Black business ownership and development on a large scale. Yet these same organizations, well The NAACP were prime movers in the demotion of "manual labor" and "international black business."
As an aside, my understanding is that people who are self employed are not included in the employment records. I wonder what impact their numbers would have if these persons were included in the employment figures.
In the past two weeks or so there have been various reports regarding the unemployment level of blacks in NYC. Apparently the stats show a rate of 49% unemployment among black men and 43% unemployment among black females. A New York Times article entitled: Nearly Half of [New York City] Black Men Found Jobless written by Janny Scott gave the following statistic:
Mark Levitan, the report's author, found that just 51.8 percent of black men ages 16 to 64 held jobs in New York City in 2003. The rate for white men was 75.7 percent; for Hispanic men, 65.7; and for black women, 57.1. The employment-population ratio for black men was the lowest for the period Mr. Levitan has studied, which goes back to 1979.
"We're left with a very big question,'' Mr. Levitan, a senior policy analyst with the society, said in an interview. "As the economy recovers, will we see a rise in employment among black men in tandem with the rise in employment of city residents generally? In other words, is this fundamentally a cyclical problem or is it more deeply structural? I fear that it is more deeply structural."
What I ask the reader to consider is the following pattern. The greater the economic independence of the group the lower their reported unemployment rate. So given that whites in general "run the roost" then their relatively low rate of unemployment is expected. Looking at Hispanics we are forced to look at a few things. In contrast to Blacks (note some Hispanics are black, but for simplicity sake we'll entertain the implied dichotomy), Hispanics have greater economic power than blacks, specifically American born blacks. I specify American born blacks because there is a large and growing population of non-American (as in descendents of those enslaved) blacks who demonstrate similar economic activity as to Hispanics and other non-black immigrants. When one goes into a black community one thing that generally stands out is that the ownership of various businesses are of people who are not of the same racial or ethnic grouping. Laundry by Asians, Gas stations by Indians and Arabs. Pharmacies by Indians or Whites, Fast food places generally owned by whites, Fish markets owned by Asians. Supermarkets are generally owned by whites. American Blacks generally own hair salons and mom-and pop "Soul Food" joints. So there is a discernible pattern that links business ownership and employment. Why does this redeem Booker T Washington and Marcus Garvey?
When I was a youngster I was indoctrinated into believing that although Booker T Washington was "the man" for founding Tuskegee Normal Institute, he was still a sellout for his "accomodationist" views towards whites. Apparently his sin was to tell blacks (and whites) that blacks should forgo politics in favor of developing skills and various industries and building up themselves economically and then moving into politics. This was summed up by his "cast your bucket where you are" story. This view was and continues to be derided by much of the black intelligensia. They favor WEB Dubois' idea that the talented tenth should put social and political pressure on the white establishment to "let them in" and "treat them equally." Of course we now see what the Talented Tenth does when they "get in." Marcus Garvey was also of the opinion that Blacks had to develop industrially to become economically independent of whites. Once they had done so they would be able to demand the political and social respect of whites regardless of what the latter thought personally of them.
Both of these views were uniformly rejected by black "leadership" and "intelligensia." fast forward to today. Blacks who rejected black business and development to "integration" and "political favors" are now facing unemployment at high rates. Manufacturing jobs, or the "steel plantations" are being pushed over seas. The impact is the precipitous drop in family incomes as black men are unable to bring bread to the table. Black farmers, who have been losing land to large white corporations are also the victim of the Talented Tenth, who failed to use their talent to found large black corporations to protect black farmland. So too has the black consumer failed to support black businesses, including banks. This failure, especially virulent after integration, has resulted in the near decimation of black businesses. There are many black businesses today that are more wary of black consumers than white businesses in Jim Crow days.
Now we have Black organizations, such as the NAACP, the Urban League, etc. who now support the idea of Black business ownership and development on a large scale. Yet these same organizations, well The NAACP were prime movers in the demotion of "manual labor" and "international black business."
As an aside, my understanding is that people who are self employed are not included in the employment records. I wonder what impact their numbers would have if these persons were included in the employment figures.
Coups. We Ain't Talkin' 'bout Sports Cars
It seems that yet again there is war in the DRC.
quote:
Shells were also dropped on densely populated parts of town, and a private television station also came under attack.
"Rocket-propelled grenades were fired from the direction of the Palais de la Nation [Presidential Palace] in the direction of the president's house and fire returned," said the UK Ambassador in Kinshasa, Jim Atkinson, quoted by Reuters news agency.
Unnamed police officers quoted by AFP news agency said the attackers were former members of the personal guard of the late dictator Mobutu Sese Seko - who was ousted in 1997.
And for those of you not in the know, Mobutu was a CIA stooge who ran the DRC, then Zaire, into the ground and then got a flight to a chatteu in the French Alps. Interest in the DRC ranges from Diamonds, Uranium, plutonium and if I remember correctly, Coultan, which runs our cell phones. The crassness of these "rebels" regearding the lives of the citizens of this country is simply inexecusable. I suppose that these former "big men" do not find civilian life rewarding enough that they feel the need to get back into "power" in order to live the lush life. I could go on and on about US and European complicity in these affairs but I realy need to ask when will the pawns just get themselves off or get put off the chess board? How is it that their "brothers in arms" do not see that after years of fighting that they are only making the country worse? Of course they do. They just don't care. And of course "not caring" was the prerequisite for getting the arms.
Links:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3576139.stm
It seems that yet again there is war in the DRC.
quote:
Shells were also dropped on densely populated parts of town, and a private television station also came under attack.
"Rocket-propelled grenades were fired from the direction of the Palais de la Nation [Presidential Palace] in the direction of the president's house and fire returned," said the UK Ambassador in Kinshasa, Jim Atkinson, quoted by Reuters news agency.
Unnamed police officers quoted by AFP news agency said the attackers were former members of the personal guard of the late dictator Mobutu Sese Seko - who was ousted in 1997.
And for those of you not in the know, Mobutu was a CIA stooge who ran the DRC, then Zaire, into the ground and then got a flight to a chatteu in the French Alps. Interest in the DRC ranges from Diamonds, Uranium, plutonium and if I remember correctly, Coultan, which runs our cell phones. The crassness of these "rebels" regearding the lives of the citizens of this country is simply inexecusable. I suppose that these former "big men" do not find civilian life rewarding enough that they feel the need to get back into "power" in order to live the lush life. I could go on and on about US and European complicity in these affairs but I realy need to ask when will the pawns just get themselves off or get put off the chess board? How is it that their "brothers in arms" do not see that after years of fighting that they are only making the country worse? Of course they do. They just don't care. And of course "not caring" was the prerequisite for getting the arms.
Links:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3576139.stm
Friday, March 26, 2004
Bully in de Yard
Democracy Now is reporting that Ms. Rice (tha skeeza) has sent a warning to the Jamaican government that it must expell Aristide from it's country. It is also understood that if "anything happened to any American forces in Haiti, that the consequences of that would be exacted against a president or against Jamaica by the United States with full force."
quote:
RANDALL ROBINSON: I don't know that the specific actions that the U.S. would take, or were made, were spelled out. It was clear that Ms. Rice told the Jamaican Government that if Aristide was not expelled immediately, and anything happened to any American forces in Haiti, that the consequences of that would be exacted against a president or against Jamaica by the United States with full force. Now, one doesn't know what that means, but we know what America is capable of doing. It's abducted the President. It executed the coup. It took him to a country with which it has no relations, nor does any African country to speak of, that the state department warns all people not to go to. We brought him back to Jamaica, to his home region and the U.S., of course, has brought full weight of its authority upon Jamaica to have him expelled immediately. Hearing that his simple presence there would cause people in Haiti to rally to salvage their democracy.
AMY GOODMAN: How do you know Randall Robinson that Condolezza Rice is the one who’s applying pressure to Jamaica to expel the Aristides.
RANDALL ROBINSON: My source in the White House named Condoleezza Rice.
links:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/25/1537236
Democracy Now is reporting that Ms. Rice (tha skeeza) has sent a warning to the Jamaican government that it must expell Aristide from it's country. It is also understood that if "anything happened to any American forces in Haiti, that the consequences of that would be exacted against a president or against Jamaica by the United States with full force."
quote:
RANDALL ROBINSON: I don't know that the specific actions that the U.S. would take, or were made, were spelled out. It was clear that Ms. Rice told the Jamaican Government that if Aristide was not expelled immediately, and anything happened to any American forces in Haiti, that the consequences of that would be exacted against a president or against Jamaica by the United States with full force. Now, one doesn't know what that means, but we know what America is capable of doing. It's abducted the President. It executed the coup. It took him to a country with which it has no relations, nor does any African country to speak of, that the state department warns all people not to go to. We brought him back to Jamaica, to his home region and the U.S., of course, has brought full weight of its authority upon Jamaica to have him expelled immediately. Hearing that his simple presence there would cause people in Haiti to rally to salvage their democracy.
AMY GOODMAN: How do you know Randall Robinson that Condolezza Rice is the one who’s applying pressure to Jamaica to expel the Aristides.
RANDALL ROBINSON: My source in the White House named Condoleezza Rice.
links:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/25/1537236
Tuesday, March 23, 2004
Like I Said...
It would seem that my posting here has become less and less frequent. Indeed it is but not for lack of reading or time, but sometimes I get really annoyed, aggravated at some of the foolishness I see "a gwan." over at Znet there is an article which picks up on a point that I made earlier. When the US goes about supporting coups and randomly killing folks without "due process." there is much danger. Yesterday Israel killed the leader of Hamas, an elderly man who "sent" out suicide bombers to Israel. In other words he was killed for running an organization, perhaps making a few "incendiary" speeches. But physically he did nothing himself. You could say that he was a "white collar terrorist." This assassination reminds me of when a blind cleric (the name escapes me) was convicted by the US government for "inciting or exhorting" the persons who first bombed the Twin Towers. It struck me as odd that a person could be tried and convicted of suggesting that someone commit a crime. It would be like me telling someone to go kill his or herself, and after they do it, being arrested. It's not my fault they actually did it. For a nation that prides itself on the concept of personal responsibility it seems it too likes to do the group think mentality. Therein lies the problem with suicide bombers and the like. the real lawbreaker usually dies in the act. There really is no one else to blame except perhaps the bomb maker. But if we assume that all persons involved even if not directly, are criminally accountable, then that would mean all kinds of things for the US. Of course, I think that many in power know this and it is why the US is not a signatory to the World Court. Anyway I'm off topic. As it stands the assassination of Yassin, among others by the IDF who uses US made military machinery, means that the US is criminally accountable for the actions of those who use it's material. That is exactly the argument used against so-called "Al-Qaida" and it is exactly what various Palestinians will say. What is worse, and the writer over at Znet agrees is that like the backing of a Coup against a democratically elected president, backing assassinations will send the message out that everybody is fair game. A kind of street mentality will rise to new levels. the street mentality being: "get him before he can get me." Of course Bush already made it known that such an ideology was what he was going to practice. But oh how quickly it spreads. And when such a mentality spreads all are potential victims of crossfire. But alas, the US decision makers don't take public airlines or public transportation. With the exception of the Pentagon bombing, they do not have to come into contact with the consequences of their decisions. But the "terrorist" does live with the consequences. they know that "martyrdom" is a helicopter missile away and "still they rise."
I tell anyone who will listen that the number of attacks and deaths due to "terrorism" is not limited by security but by the imagination. ego and moral limitation of the "terrorist." Once the "terrorist" realizes that ego targets are not necessary, then the real body count will begin. People will be killed in malls, parking lots, buses, sidewalks, nightclubs, ferries, playgrounds, amusement parks, factories, Universities, high schools. There will be random murders here and there with "no clues." They will avoid big cities and kill off small towns. Poison fields of wheat. perhaps kill off some dairy cows. everything and anything to keep the US on a constant state of fear and push investors to leave. force enough money from educational and social services to do massive damage to the social wellbeing of the nation. What is worse is that the people making the decisions have not even begun to see how far this will go. People take movies like The Matrix and Terminator as a joke. Sit down and take a long think about the premises of these movies and look at what the government is proposing to do or actively trying to do. In all of Human history there has always, ALWAYS been war. How does this or any other administration think it will "end terrorism" without dealing with the underlying causes? There is no military means to "end terrorism." No, that's not true; there is a military means to end terrorism: genocide.
quote:
But there was something infinitely more dangerous in all this. Yet another Arab - another leader, however vengeful and ruthless - had been assassinated. The Americans want to kill Osama Bin Laden. They want to kill Mullah Omar. They killed Saddam's two sons. The Israelis repeatedly threaten to murder Yasser Arafat. It's getting to be a habit.
No one has begun to work out the implications of all this. For years, there has been an unwritten rule in the cruel war of government-versus- guerrilla. You can kill the men on the street, the bomb makers and gunmen. But the leadership on both sides - government ministers, spiritual leaders - were allowed to survive.
Now all is changed utterly. Anyone who advocates violence is now on a death list. So who can be surprised if the rules are broken by the other side?
With all their own security, Bush and Blair may be safe, but what about their ambassadors and fellow ministers? Leaders are fair game. We will not say this. If, or when, our own political leaders are gunned down or blown up, we shall vilify the killers and argue a new stage in "terrorism" has been reached. We shall forget that we are now encouraging this all- out assassination spree
Links:
http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=5191§ionID=40
It would seem that my posting here has become less and less frequent. Indeed it is but not for lack of reading or time, but sometimes I get really annoyed, aggravated at some of the foolishness I see "a gwan." over at Znet there is an article which picks up on a point that I made earlier. When the US goes about supporting coups and randomly killing folks without "due process." there is much danger. Yesterday Israel killed the leader of Hamas, an elderly man who "sent" out suicide bombers to Israel. In other words he was killed for running an organization, perhaps making a few "incendiary" speeches. But physically he did nothing himself. You could say that he was a "white collar terrorist." This assassination reminds me of when a blind cleric (the name escapes me) was convicted by the US government for "inciting or exhorting" the persons who first bombed the Twin Towers. It struck me as odd that a person could be tried and convicted of suggesting that someone commit a crime. It would be like me telling someone to go kill his or herself, and after they do it, being arrested. It's not my fault they actually did it. For a nation that prides itself on the concept of personal responsibility it seems it too likes to do the group think mentality. Therein lies the problem with suicide bombers and the like. the real lawbreaker usually dies in the act. There really is no one else to blame except perhaps the bomb maker. But if we assume that all persons involved even if not directly, are criminally accountable, then that would mean all kinds of things for the US. Of course, I think that many in power know this and it is why the US is not a signatory to the World Court. Anyway I'm off topic. As it stands the assassination of Yassin, among others by the IDF who uses US made military machinery, means that the US is criminally accountable for the actions of those who use it's material. That is exactly the argument used against so-called "Al-Qaida" and it is exactly what various Palestinians will say. What is worse, and the writer over at Znet agrees is that like the backing of a Coup against a democratically elected president, backing assassinations will send the message out that everybody is fair game. A kind of street mentality will rise to new levels. the street mentality being: "get him before he can get me." Of course Bush already made it known that such an ideology was what he was going to practice. But oh how quickly it spreads. And when such a mentality spreads all are potential victims of crossfire. But alas, the US decision makers don't take public airlines or public transportation. With the exception of the Pentagon bombing, they do not have to come into contact with the consequences of their decisions. But the "terrorist" does live with the consequences. they know that "martyrdom" is a helicopter missile away and "still they rise."
I tell anyone who will listen that the number of attacks and deaths due to "terrorism" is not limited by security but by the imagination. ego and moral limitation of the "terrorist." Once the "terrorist" realizes that ego targets are not necessary, then the real body count will begin. People will be killed in malls, parking lots, buses, sidewalks, nightclubs, ferries, playgrounds, amusement parks, factories, Universities, high schools. There will be random murders here and there with "no clues." They will avoid big cities and kill off small towns. Poison fields of wheat. perhaps kill off some dairy cows. everything and anything to keep the US on a constant state of fear and push investors to leave. force enough money from educational and social services to do massive damage to the social wellbeing of the nation. What is worse is that the people making the decisions have not even begun to see how far this will go. People take movies like The Matrix and Terminator as a joke. Sit down and take a long think about the premises of these movies and look at what the government is proposing to do or actively trying to do. In all of Human history there has always, ALWAYS been war. How does this or any other administration think it will "end terrorism" without dealing with the underlying causes? There is no military means to "end terrorism." No, that's not true; there is a military means to end terrorism: genocide.
quote:
But there was something infinitely more dangerous in all this. Yet another Arab - another leader, however vengeful and ruthless - had been assassinated. The Americans want to kill Osama Bin Laden. They want to kill Mullah Omar. They killed Saddam's two sons. The Israelis repeatedly threaten to murder Yasser Arafat. It's getting to be a habit.
No one has begun to work out the implications of all this. For years, there has been an unwritten rule in the cruel war of government-versus- guerrilla. You can kill the men on the street, the bomb makers and gunmen. But the leadership on both sides - government ministers, spiritual leaders - were allowed to survive.
Now all is changed utterly. Anyone who advocates violence is now on a death list. So who can be surprised if the rules are broken by the other side?
With all their own security, Bush and Blair may be safe, but what about their ambassadors and fellow ministers? Leaders are fair game. We will not say this. If, or when, our own political leaders are gunned down or blown up, we shall vilify the killers and argue a new stage in "terrorism" has been reached. We shall forget that we are now encouraging this all- out assassination spree
Links:
http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=5191§ionID=40
Friday, March 19, 2004
The Shell Game
I've told everyone that would listen not to buy Shell oil or gas because of the situation in Nigeria. Most people, these being largely black people, didn't care. The same excuse was always given: I live here, blah blah blah. anyway. the NYTimes has an article covering Shells recent reserves issues
turns out a part of the reason for overstating reserves was too prop up the Nigerian government. The same government that put Ken Saro Wiwa to death for advocating that Shell stop polluting his peoples land. I told ya'll Shell was dirty.
quote:
In any case, the documents about Nigeria offer a far bleaker assessment of Nigerian operations than the company's public disclosures.
Nigeria, for example, has called for an end to the practice of flaring, or burning off, natural gas that is a byproduct of oil production; two billion cubic feet of natural gas are burned this way in Nigeria every day, and this has become an environmental and political issue. Mr. Corrigan said the company was committed to meeting the target. Shell's Web site says "this opportunity" to gather gas "is going well."
But the Shell documents present a different view. A high-level review in December found that many oil field projects did not include plans to gather natural gas, and that "oil production would have to be shut in," or stopped, unless the company found a way to use the gas. Shell could sell it in Europe or the United States, but natural gas is expensive to transport across the ocean.
Links:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/19/business/worldbusiness/19OIL.html?hp
I've told everyone that would listen not to buy Shell oil or gas because of the situation in Nigeria. Most people, these being largely black people, didn't care. The same excuse was always given: I live here, blah blah blah. anyway. the NYTimes has an article covering Shells recent reserves issues
turns out a part of the reason for overstating reserves was too prop up the Nigerian government. The same government that put Ken Saro Wiwa to death for advocating that Shell stop polluting his peoples land. I told ya'll Shell was dirty.
quote:
In any case, the documents about Nigeria offer a far bleaker assessment of Nigerian operations than the company's public disclosures.
Nigeria, for example, has called for an end to the practice of flaring, or burning off, natural gas that is a byproduct of oil production; two billion cubic feet of natural gas are burned this way in Nigeria every day, and this has become an environmental and political issue. Mr. Corrigan said the company was committed to meeting the target. Shell's Web site says "this opportunity" to gather gas "is going well."
But the Shell documents present a different view. A high-level review in December found that many oil field projects did not include plans to gather natural gas, and that "oil production would have to be shut in," or stopped, unless the company found a way to use the gas. Shell could sell it in Europe or the United States, but natural gas is expensive to transport across the ocean.
Links:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/19/business/worldbusiness/19OIL.html?hp
Monday, March 15, 2004
bones Fall Out The Closet
The one thing about lies is that if you tell to many of them, you eventually forget which lies you told and get caught lying about the lie. Donald Rumsfeld has apparently fallen victim to one of his ["many, many, many many many" to quote the Fugees] lies. as recorded by the Center for American Progress
quote:
"You and a few other critics are the only people I've heard use the phrase 'immediate threat.' I didn't...It's become kind of folklore that that's what happened."
- Donald Rumsfeld, 3/14/04
VERSUS
"No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people than the regime of Saddam Hussein and Iraq."
- Donald Rumsfeld, 9/19/02
In addition there is a nice video clip available that shows Rumsfeld on CBS' Face the Nation. I'l be downloading that clip and storing it for posterity.
Links:
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=6228
http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7bE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7d/RUMSFELDDENY4.WMV
The one thing about lies is that if you tell to many of them, you eventually forget which lies you told and get caught lying about the lie. Donald Rumsfeld has apparently fallen victim to one of his ["many, many, many many many" to quote the Fugees] lies. as recorded by the Center for American Progress
quote:
"You and a few other critics are the only people I've heard use the phrase 'immediate threat.' I didn't...It's become kind of folklore that that's what happened."
- Donald Rumsfeld, 3/14/04
VERSUS
"No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people than the regime of Saddam Hussein and Iraq."
- Donald Rumsfeld, 9/19/02
In addition there is a nice video clip available that shows Rumsfeld on CBS' Face the Nation. I'l be downloading that clip and storing it for posterity.
Links:
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=6228
http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7bE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7d/RUMSFELDDENY4.WMV
Seemingly Unrelated
In a recent discussion with a netizen I was re-iterating the importance of understanding Dr. Frances Cress Welsing's cone shaped diagram. This diagram is used to illustrate how seemingly unrelated items can in fact be related if one performs some analysis. In her diagram the top (circle) portion of the cone has different dots referencing different items. In her case these items were the areas of people activity. At the base of the cone was a single item,which for her purposes was White Supremacy. One quickly realizes that such a cone can be used to connect various items and each item on the top of the cone can have it's own cone of convergence. As fate usually does me, shortly after having this discusion, I ran across this piece over at Bushwars..
quote:
Additional evidence that Cheney played an early planning role is contained in a previously undisclosed National Security Council document, dated February 3, 2001. The top-secret document, written by a high-level NSC official, concerned Cheney's newly formed Energy Task Force. It directed the NSC staff to cooperate fully with the Energy Task Force as it considered the "melding" of two seemingly unrelated areas of policy: "the review of operational policies toward rogue states," such as Iraq, and "actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields."... "But if this little group was discussing geostrategic plans for oil, it puts the issue of war in the context of the captains of the oil industry sitting down with Cheney and laying grand, global plans."
A baby elephant takes 9 months to gestate. no wonder these folks are Republicans.
links:
http://babelogue.citypages.com:8080/sperry/2004/03/15
In a recent discussion with a netizen I was re-iterating the importance of understanding Dr. Frances Cress Welsing's cone shaped diagram. This diagram is used to illustrate how seemingly unrelated items can in fact be related if one performs some analysis. In her diagram the top (circle) portion of the cone has different dots referencing different items. In her case these items were the areas of people activity. At the base of the cone was a single item,which for her purposes was White Supremacy. One quickly realizes that such a cone can be used to connect various items and each item on the top of the cone can have it's own cone of convergence. As fate usually does me, shortly after having this discusion, I ran across this piece over at Bushwars..
quote:
Additional evidence that Cheney played an early planning role is contained in a previously undisclosed National Security Council document, dated February 3, 2001. The top-secret document, written by a high-level NSC official, concerned Cheney's newly formed Energy Task Force. It directed the NSC staff to cooperate fully with the Energy Task Force as it considered the "melding" of two seemingly unrelated areas of policy: "the review of operational policies toward rogue states," such as Iraq, and "actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields."... "But if this little group was discussing geostrategic plans for oil, it puts the issue of war in the context of the captains of the oil industry sitting down with Cheney and laying grand, global plans."
A baby elephant takes 9 months to gestate. no wonder these folks are Republicans.
links:
http://babelogue.citypages.com:8080/sperry/2004/03/15
Wednesday, March 10, 2004
Iraq...Haiti...Equatorial Guinea?
Not satisfied with Iraq and Haiti, evidence is growing that an American plane filled with suspected mercenaries were headed to Eq. Guinea in order to overthrow that government. To be honest I haven't been up on what the situation in that country is, but with Zimbabwe about to put the 60 people from that plane on trial, there may be some serious info about to get put out.
quote:
Equatorial Guinea arrested a separate group of 15 suspected mercenaries, said to be involved in the same alleged plot.
The oil-rich state's president said South Africa had warned him that a group of mercenaries was heading for his country and he suggested that they had had foreign backing of hostile foreign powers and multinational firms.
A man said to be the leader of the "mercenaries" has appeared on Equatorial Guinea state television to say that they had been part of a plot to remove Mr Obiang and put an exiled opposition leader in power.
"It wasn't a question of taking the life of the head of state but of spiriting him away, taking him to Spain and forcing him into exile and then of immediately installing the government-in-exile of Severo Moto Nsa," said the alleged coup leader, who introduced himself as Nick du Toit, according to a transcript released by AFP news agency.
In Spain, Mr Moto, who led a failed coup bid in Equatorial Guinea in 1997, denied any role in the alleged plot but also launched a blistering attack on President Obiang, who himself took power in a coup in 1979.
Read the rest over at the BBC
Links:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/3500132.stm
Not satisfied with Iraq and Haiti, evidence is growing that an American plane filled with suspected mercenaries were headed to Eq. Guinea in order to overthrow that government. To be honest I haven't been up on what the situation in that country is, but with Zimbabwe about to put the 60 people from that plane on trial, there may be some serious info about to get put out.
quote:
Equatorial Guinea arrested a separate group of 15 suspected mercenaries, said to be involved in the same alleged plot.
The oil-rich state's president said South Africa had warned him that a group of mercenaries was heading for his country and he suggested that they had had foreign backing of hostile foreign powers and multinational firms.
A man said to be the leader of the "mercenaries" has appeared on Equatorial Guinea state television to say that they had been part of a plot to remove Mr Obiang and put an exiled opposition leader in power.
"It wasn't a question of taking the life of the head of state but of spiriting him away, taking him to Spain and forcing him into exile and then of immediately installing the government-in-exile of Severo Moto Nsa," said the alleged coup leader, who introduced himself as Nick du Toit, according to a transcript released by AFP news agency.
In Spain, Mr Moto, who led a failed coup bid in Equatorial Guinea in 1997, denied any role in the alleged plot but also launched a blistering attack on President Obiang, who himself took power in a coup in 1979.
Read the rest over at the BBC
Links:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/3500132.stm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)