Not that I'm trying to make this the Tran Report, but this issue is perhaps the most blatant abuse of government authority since COVID. At least with the COVID nonsense you could see how someone could believe the propaganda. Most people don't know about viruses. They don't know about medicine and they implicitly trust their doctors. The tranny nonsense has none of these characteristics. Here the government is literally punishing people to enforce something that is obviously not true.
In my last post I laid out the scheme and in this one I'm going to show The Stick. From Newsweek
More and more girls are refusing to play against boys (and men) and so the authorities have to make examples of them. Sure you can object to them playing, but you *will not defy us publicly*!
Five West Virginia middle-school track athletes who protested the participation of a transgender student in a recent competition have been barred from future meets and are now engaged in a legal battle with their school district that could end up at the Supreme Court.
On April 18, during the 2024 Harrison County Middle School Championships, the student athletes — all girls — made local headlines by stepping out of the shot-put circle, choosing to forfeit rather than compete against a 13-year-old transgender female. The silent protest came after a federal appeals court struck down part of West Virginia's transgender sports ban, allowing the 13-year-old in question to compete at her team's events.
First, per my rule, there is no such thing as a "transgender female". There is a man/male who thinks (or wants us to think) he is a female. In sports this is often a ploy for a under performing male to become a winner by competing against lesser competition.
Note again that is was the "federal appeals court" that is setting the precedent.
"The students' protest, lasting about 10 seconds, was aimed at expressing their disagreement with the decision last month from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the state "Save Women's Sports Act" was a violation of the 13-year-old's Title IX protections, which ban sex-discrimination in schools.
Their protest has cost them a chance to compete in future events — a move that has now triggered a state lawsuit alleging infringement on their rights to free speech."
Constitution states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." [My underlines]
The 14th amendment brings these down to the state level, meaning the punishment of these girls by the [public] school is a gross violation of the 1st Amendment. Whatever the court thinks about Title IX, it does not supersede 1A.
""The only thing this decision does is teach these children to keep their mouths shut and not disagree with what they saw as unfairness,"
Exactly. They are using the power of the state to literally oppress girls.
"The ACLU of West Virginia, which was among the plaintiffs who filed the original suit when the Save Women's Sports Act was signed into law in 2021, has come out in support of last month's appellate court decision."
Yes, of course they did.
