As the summer of the Pandemic of the Vaccinated continues apace, the media is trying to gaslight the public into continuing to believe the narrative. Here's some from Fortune:
You have to be a special kind of fool to believe that being infected my Omicron while "vaccinated" offers more "protection" than while "not-vaccinated". We already know that for populations in the 50+ range that the vaccines have negative efficacy (you are more likely to get sick AND die).
"Looking at vaccinated individuals who had a breakthrough Omicron infection, BioNTech found that those individuals showed a better b-cell response than individuals who had been boosted but not infected. B-cells, a type of white blood cell, are a component of the body’s immune system that helps produce antibodies."
Always the anti-bodies. We already discussed the entire cross-reactivity from T-Cells. Why do these people continue to harp on about anti-bodies? Maybe because these companies are pushing a product that causes the body to produce them and THAT is what they need to sell the public on.
"The study found that vaccinated individuals who caught Omicron produced antibodies that formed a formidable defense against other variants of the virus. Unvaccinated people who caught Omicron did not have a similarly robust and protective immune response."
I call total and utter bullshit on this one. Notice that they are saying that the "vaccinated" are producing epitopes while the "not vaccinated" do not. That is total and utter bullshit. Epitope production happens to any and everybody who has been exposed to a virus. Those epitopes will vary from individual to individual but to act like the "vaccines" have any part in this other than epitopes against the "alpha" spike protein is total and utter bullshit.
The only possibility here is if the "not vaccinated" group had never been exposed to "alpha" and therefore would not have epitopes for that variant. The fact is that any person (vaxxed or not) who has been exposed to Alpha, Delta and Omicron (and recovered) will have epitopes for all of them. And again, one doesn't need a "strong antibody response" if your T-Cells are already "sensitive" to Omicron or your mucosal immunity (which we've discussed in earlier posts and videos) has stopped the infection in the nose and upper airways before any other part of the immune system needs to get involved.
Here's Bloomberg admitting the jabs are junk:
'In practical terms, this means that for the large swath of the US population that was first infected with Covid over the winter, the post-infection honeymoon may be over. Those people might wonder how safe it is to travel, attend large gatherings and have dinner with vulnerable friends and relatives."
This is a part of the theme I discussed in my "Reject the Magic Stick" video. This idea that people are "unsafe" and doing things is "unsafe". It is a paranoia.
"Scientists do have one concrete piece of evidence: Unvaccinated people who have been infected with Omicron get very little protection against sublineages of that virus. A South African study revealed a wide gap between vaccinated and unvaccinated people in the amount of antibodies generated after an Omicron infection."
But per my previous discussion, 42% of COVID dead are "vaccinated" so that whole "antibody" thing isn't really relevant is it now?
"So how often are reinfections happening in people with hybrid immunity? While health experts initially thought they were rare, emerging state-level data suggest they could be becoming more common."
"More common". Some of us said this would happen.
"But public health experts also point out that in rare cases people are getting reinfected within weeks. In this pandemic, there is no such thing as guaranteed protection."
I recall a government agency making the opposite claim.
"There is at least a decent chance that subsequent infections in people with hybrid immunity will be less severe, as the immune system gets better at responding to the virus."
Did I mention the 42% dead are vaccinated?