Denmark Drops Vaccine Plans

 File this under News They Hope You Don't See.

In contrast to the US where people are panicking about not being able to force other people to wear masks on a plane and the continual push to get [more] shots, this little gem tells us that the narrative is showing serious cracks.

"Denmark has become the first country to halt its Covid vaccination program, saying it is doing so because the virus is now under control."

Weird. Fauci is still running around talking about the "next variant."

"“Spring has arrived, vaccine coverage in the Danish population is high, and the epidemic has reversed,” the Danish Health Authority said in a statement Wednesday.

“Therefore, the National Board of Health is now ending the broad vaccination efforts against Covid-19 for this season,” it said. People will not be invited for vaccines from May 15, it said, although everyone will be able to finish their course of vaccination."

So is this an admission that COVID is seasonal? Seems those of us who pointed this out back in say June 2020 were RIGHT THE ENTIRE TIME, and yet we were called "science deniers" and that we were peddling "mis-information".

"Denmark’s Covid vaccination campaign began soon after Christmas in 2020. Some 4.8 million citizens have been vaccinated, the health authority said, with more than 3.6 million people receiving a booster shot.

At the same time, many people have been infected since the omicron variant became the dominant strain of the virus, it said, meaning immunity levels among the population are high."

This is a CYA way of saying "we discovered these vaccines did nothing against the current strains and continuing to act like it does is stupid so we're going to stop now." Check the graph. Remember that they started their vaccination at the end of Dec 2020.

 That huge peak? April 2022. How do you have a massive vaccination program from December 2020 and have massively MORE cases in April 2022? By the "vaccine" not stopping transmission or infection, that's how.

If I were in charge and saw that graph, I'd be done with these things as well. 

I expect to see more of this, which China continues to show how it's NOT done.

More Lefty Censorship

 Hopefully by now those of you who thought I was being extreme when I called the left's "new shoes" The Left Crow, understand that I wasn't.  They have truly shown their colors. The proverbial mask has dropped (as the N95s have come on) and the teeth are fully bared. Colleges and university where they ensconced  themselves and waiting for the broad protection of tenure and total control of the administrative arena have now revealed themselves to be the indoctrination camps they were never meant to be. Latest example being Brown University.

I will remind the reader that many times the breakthroughs in science have happened when people refused to accept "the science" or questioned the prevailing data  and tested the hypotheses. These people would have refused to accept the idea that the earth circled the sun rather than vice-versa, because that was "the science".

A college has no business declaring an organization (or person) as "science disinformation spreaders". Rather the standard should be the supporting evidence. That is, those who are committing fraud should be cut off. Those who make claims such was "NY will be a frozen wasteland by the year 2000" should be unwelcome to do business at a university. 

But of course Brown has no intention of holding persons promoting lefty narratives to the "science disinformation" standard. Evidence:

"Move forward with the creation of a clearinghouse for actions against organizations and
funders that seek to deny climate change, or delay climate change with the intention of a)
perpetuating climate science disinformation or b) supporting organizations that advance
climate science disinformation."

Notice that they have already determined what "the science" is: 

"climate change is 'real'".

Which of course is true as the climate is always changing as sure as the earth orbits the sun in an orbit that is never exactly the same as the last one. Try telling that to one of these people and watch them glow red with rage. I've actually had "believe the science" people deny this very fact.

I won't even get into the fact that CO2 is plant food. As I've said before I'm far more concerned about the destruction of forests than the CO2 emissions from a vehicle.

Anyway you can rest assured that this "stand" by Brown will not stop at climate change, formerly global warming, formerly global cooling.

Mysterious Liver Ailment

 I saw some rumblings about this online last week and now I've seen an article on it.

"Mysterious liver ailment" with "no known cause".

You know, I work in IT. Whenever there is a computer problem, the first thing I ask is "what happened on the system recently". Because most of the time something "new" happened and that "new" thing triggered the bad behaviour.

Well, we have a rash of  hepatitis with "no known cause" so we should be asking what happened recently?  Let's look at this article.

"

More than 160 cases of severe pediatric hepatitis, or liver inflammation, in kids without existing health issues have been reported from about a dozen countries, including the U.K., Canada and Japan. The disorder has been seen mainly in children younger than 10 and has left a few needing liver transplants. Researchers are probing links to infection with adenoviruses, a family of pathogens that more commonly cause cold-like symptoms, as well as Covid-19."

Adenoviruses you say? That's interesting. Why? Well because the current COVID vaccines use adenovirus for delivery:

"The currently administered vaccines depend on adenovirus DNA vectors or on SARS-CoV-2 mRNA that might become reverse transcribed into DNA, however infrequently."

Oh.

"The review also addresses problems of remaining adenoviral gene expression in adenoviral-based vectors and their role in side effects of vaccines."

Side effects from "adenoviral-based vectors"? Say what ARE those side effects? And say, wouldn't a person want to know what those effects are PRIOR to taking one of those vaccines? And did anyone who mandated these vaccines consider any of these "side effects"?

"Eventually, it will come down to weighing the possible risks of genomic insertions of vaccine-associated foreign DNA and unknown levels of vector-carried adenoviral gene expression versus protection against the dangers of Covid-19." 

Eventually. Like, this is all a test and eventually we find out the results. If they're bad, well, sucks to be you I suppose.

Adenovirus particles likely are taken up by cells of the lymphatic system and the liver, and their DNA will be transported to the cells’ nuclei. In this review, the evidence for insertion of adenovirus DNA into recipient genomes and its consequences has been presented.[my underlines]

Now that paper showed research in mice. For all we know the stuff we're seeing in children is the "eventually".

But since children under 5, at least in the US, cannot get a vaccine that has the adenovirus, I cannot say that it is *due to* the vaccine for that population. But for those over 5 years of age, we should be asking about their vaccination status. After all it IS the one major thing that is different.

How The Grooming Is Done

 Michael Knowles shows how the teachers are indoctrinating the children. And your kids are unlikely to bring this up to you because they are being conditioned to believe this is normal. See when it comes to older people they are just waiting on you to die. Meanwhile they have you leaving your kids with them for 8-10 hours a day (what? You forgot about after school programs?)

Garvey's Ghost TV 4-25-2022: The Rule Of Law

Sorry for the horrible audio drift

Rumble:

 

BitChute:

In this episode we examine:

 

*The CDC thinks it has law making power.

*Saying "no" to the LGBTQRSLMNOP+-= community is a must

Just Walk On By

 Recent news had more evidence of the BLM movement being a scam. I knew it was a scam. I said it was  a scam but I was not and am not mad at the two black women making out like bandits from it. Why? Because apparently they were good enough at their niche to get people to give them millions of dollars and to give their scam free publicity. As The Joker said: If you're good at something, you don't do it for free. (I suppose that means I stink at this blogging thing...)

Nope, the only people I'm mad at are the black people, who should know better giving these people money and/or propping up the fraudulent movement. But that's not what this post is about, this post is about a crime that happened in Atlanta.

Anthony Frazier, 51, was shot and killed outside an American Seafood and Wings, where he worked as a security guard, on Cleveland Avenue in Atlanta, Georgia, on Monday around 7pm by an unidentified man wearing black jeans and a black t-shirt. 

Surveillance video released by police shows Frazier exiting the SUV, looking behind him as his attacker rounds the corner and another man sits on the curb smoking. Seemingly unaware of the upcoming attack, Frazier calmly gets out of his car and lights his own cigarette.  

His attacker reportedly shot him in the back of his head, which is not shown in the edited surveillance footage, before walking away.

Now the entire move of rolling up on this guy and shooting him in the back of the head was bad enough. Even the old drunkard who witnessed the entire thing is not all that surprising. It was the next part.

3 other people saw this man laying on the ground bleeding to death, if not already dead and these folks just walked on by.

Black lives matter eh?

But as usual the "leadership" still don't get it:

"Councilman Antonio Lewis, who stopped by the scene on Monday after hearing about it, is now suggesting lockboxes as a way to curb gun-related crimes. 

'We have to find a way to balance it out. You can’t talk about crime and talk about dangers and violent crime, while making it easier access to get these guns,' he told Channel 2 News. "

Hint: It's not the guns.

Connecticut Thinks It's Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Other States

For those who don't know, the US system of governance has three parts: Executive, Legislative and Judicial.  On the federal level, certain courts have jurisdiction over various states. Federal laws are usually supreme over state law so long as they don't conflict with separation of powers and powers delegated to the federal govt. vs. state governments.

States, are like France and England. Separate and without jurisdiction over each other's citizens. So for example, if you kill a person in NY State, courts in Connecticut have no jurisdiction over the matter. The event did not happen in Connecticut. And while killing may be illegal in Connecticut as well, that doesn't give Connecticut courts juridiction nor does the AG of Connecticut have any standing to bring a case against a NY state person who committed a crime in NY State.

As a matter of fact, if that NY state person crossed into Connecticut to hide out from NY state authorities, the CT police would only have the right to detain that person and extradite him TO NY state to answer for that crime.

So just to show you how liberals give no shits about statecraft or rule of law, the state of Connecticut is entertaining a bill that would give their court jurisdiction over other state's citizens. 

"The Connecticut House of Representatives passed a pro-abortion bill on Tuesday with bipartisan support that pushes back against pro-life laws passed in several states to protect the unborn. The bill allows individuals who face legal liabilities for violating abortion statutes in other states to sue for damages in court in Connecticut."

Uh...what? Do they not understand the total can of worms that opens up?

""The bill also establishes a cause of action that allows persons who were sued in another state for allegedly providing, or receiving support for, reproductive health services that are legal in Connecticut to recover certain costs they incurred defending the original action and bringing an action under the bill," the legislation, H.B. 5414, states."

You can read the bill here: https://www.cga.ct.gov/2022/FC/PDF/2022HB-05414-R000509-FC.PDF 

In essence they are trying to bind citizens of other states to CT law and jurisdiction. These imbeciles don't seem to realize that if passed and upheld, every state could create laws where it's citizens can sue citizens of other states for violating that states laws.  It simply creates conflict.

This bill is clearly unconstitutional. These people don't care because it's about virtue signalling.  But it shows the extent to which they will go to control other people. They're not satisfied with making abortion legal in THEIR state, nope they gotta go mess with others.

No Compelled Speech

 Sometimes I have to discuss the amendments to the US constitution and remind people that those rights discussed are not "given" by the document. Instead those amendments are explicit restraints on the government, at every level, on infringing on those rights.  So in the case of the first amendment, it doesn't *give* you the right to free speech, it protects that right from the government. Further it must be understood that the freedom of speech includes not only the restraint on the government to compel speech (also codified in the 5th amendment) but also prohibits the government from what is called "prior-restraint" of speech.

Webster's dictionary currently defines prior restraint as follows:

governmental prohibition imposed on expression before the expression actually takes place

Of late with the tranny nonsense, many state agencies have attempted to impose both compelled speech as well as prior restraint upon those in its employment. Recently a court punished a university for it.

Shawnee State University in Ohio has reached a settlement with a professor whom it punished for refusing to use a transgender student’s preferred pronouns, according to a new report. 

The university will pay philosophy professor Nick Meriwether $400,000 in damages and attorney fees and will rescind a written warning it issued to Meriwether in June 2018 in response to a biological male student’s complaint that the professor refused to use female pronouns for the student, Fox News reported.

Hint, If your university has the word "state" in it,  you should know better than compelled speech.

The controversy began in January 18 when Meriwether responded to the student’s question during a political philosophy class by saying, “Yes, sir.” After class, the student told the professor that the student is transgender and asked to be referred to as a woman going forward, including with “feminine titles and pronouns,” according to the Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented Meriwether in court. 

The professor argued that obliging the student’s requests would violate his own convictions as a Christian. When the professor declined to use female pronouns, the student became belligerent and told Meriwether he would be fired, according to court documents cited by Fox News.

 

Now my problem here is the religious assertion. I have discussed elsewhere that non-theistic ideologies are equally protected by the first amendment.  But worse here is that here you had a state agency attempting to punish a citizen for stating actual facts and refusing to engage in the delusions of another person. 

The student then filed a complaint with Shawnee State, which opened an investigation into the incident. The university found that the professor “effectively created a hostile environment” for the student by not using the preferred pronouns. Meriwether offered to call the student by any name requested, however. The student did not accept the professor’s offer, according to the report.

Here's the thing though. It was the student who created the hostile environment. Up until he started demanding to put words into the professor's mouth there was no "hostilities". It was the demand to force the professor to say something [that was completely untrue] that was an act of hostility. 

This is how they do. They put the world upside down and then try to say that YOU have a problem for noticing that things are wrong.

“Dr. Meriwether rightly defended his freedom to speak and stay silent, and not conform to the university’s demand for uniformity of thought. We commend the university for ultimately agreeing to do the right thing, in keeping with its reason for existence as a marketplace of ideas.”

Personally, I think $400k is too little. A couple hundred million will get the word out quickly to all state colleges and other government agencies that they cannot engage in either prior restraint or compelled speech.

The Temptation

 

Use of face masks did not impact COVID-19 incidence

 

 

Really?

Who knew?

Oh right. I did.  And I explained the physics. As for the paper:

 Our aim was to compare COVID-19 incidence among 10–12-year-olds between cities with different recommendations on the use of face masks in schools...

"We compared the differences in trends of 14-day incidences between Helsinki and Turku among 10–12-year-olds, and for comparison, also among ages 7–9 and 30–49 by using joinpoint regression. According to our analysis, no additional effect seemed to be gained from this, based on comparisons between the cities and between the age groups of the unvaccinated children (10–12 years versus 7–9 years)."

"no additional effect seemed to be gained."

 

 

In Case Y'all Thought I Misrepresented Disney

 Following up on the  post about being unable to monetize being anti-pedo. Here's Eric July showing the CEO of Disney saying he's all in on being "an ally" and "supporting the LMNOPQRSTUV123+-= community"

 

The battle lines are being drawn. Either you are pro-groomers and pedos which is what these folks are about or you are against the grooming of children and pedos. Ain't no middle ground. 

Either you're willing to say "no" and mean it or you are compromising the child abusers. Period.

Can't Monetize Being Anti-Pedo

 Some time back YouTube removed one of my videos for the second time. Since then I stopped posting videos to YouTube. Not that I had much traffic but it was the principle. So my videos have strictly been on Rumble, BitChute and Odysee, the latter being a place where nobody goes to watch. One of the reasons I used those platforms is that they don't censor. Again, I don't make anything from the videos but I appreciate the fact that I won't wake up one morning and find that my hard work has been permanently deleted and a notice telling people, wrongly, that I engaged in "medical misinformation".

So with that, I was surprised to notice that my latest video on the LGBTQRSTUVLMNOP+= trying to groom children, mutilate children and enable pedophiles with support from none other than the Walt Disney corp was marked "ad free". Now again, I don't make diddly squat on any of my videos so it's not a big deal.  So I was curious as to what "ad free" meant so I looked it up: 

Ads Free means your content will be hosted in our platform but it can't be monetized.

Here at Rumble We're happy to host your content, but at this time we cannot place ads on it.

In return, we offer you free hosting and as always, no restrictions. 

Videos are approved "ads free" mostly because they have not been accepted by any advertisers.

​We find that not every video has the ability to reach large audiences and be considered viral, but we encourage you to keep posting and making videos that appeal to watchers. We always recommend our users that they film in high quality video, with very clear audio and engaging background music. But it's very important that your content is engaging as well.  [My underlines]

  Now look, I don't have massive traffic. Really I don't. But even my videos with double digit views have been "monetized". So something about that "official" explanation seems odd. Let's take Rumble's word for it, that the material was "shopped" to advertisers and none of them wanted to touch it.

What does that say about the companies? You don't want your brand associated with someone or something that is against child abuse, pedophelia and child grooming?  Think how low US (and presumably Canadian) companies have fallen that they don't want to be associated with such a video.

On the other hand, lets say that Rumble is just covering it's butt and doesn't WANT such material on their site but because they have a "we don't censor" reputation to  uphold, they decided that they would demonetize, like YouTube does material someone (or some people) at Rumble think is too controversial.

Still, again, why would Rumble not want to monetize or support (beyond just being accessible) a video that is anti-pedo, anti-child abuse, anti-child mutilation and anti-child grooming?

This brings me to an article I read in Taki's Magazine.

Exacerbating the problem is the fact that left and right monetize in very different ways. Leftists have a knack when it comes to expanding their cult of fanatics by making it profitable to those who might not have otherwise joined. Leftists have made an industry out of “diversity consultants” and “diversity offices” throughout corporate America, government, entertainment, and academia. Mediocre intellects incapable of learning math and science thrive on college campuses in “diversity departments”; mediocre artists incapable of making films are hired by studios and networks to oversee “diversity quotas.” People without the intelligence to understand how to run a business are hired by corporate giants to monitor “diversity.” And your taxpayer bucks go to thousands of “diversity” bureaucrats in your state, county, and city governments.

See the dynamic here? The cult expands by getting non-cult institutions to fund the cult. To give jobs to members. To make the cult not just a belief system, but a lucrative profession...

Leftists strong-arm and extort to get money from outside their circle. Rightists keep scamming the same gullible saps within their circle. Leftists profit from their own, rightists deplete their own.

Faced with the grim reality that leftists are conducting daily hands-on conditioning in schools, and even those who aren’t conditioned are finding it profitable to parrot the cult doctrine in their professional or academic lives, it’s understandable that rightists are drawn to quick fixes. Real fixes seem an impossible task.

Apologies to TakiMag for the long block quote but it encapsulates the problem here. If I was pro-pedo and pro-child grooming and pro-child mutiliation, YouTube and the general left would "make it rain" on a video I produced. The right? Not so much. Being anti-grooming is too "risky". 

 

Eric "Bull Connor" Adams

 If you've watched any of my GGTV videos, you know I call the current NYC mayor "Bull Connor" because he has continued the shameful medical segregation. Adams has no shame and so he continues to be the bully that he is. Witness the latest:

Unfortunately there are a [large] number of you who will say "she should have kept her mouth shut". Well Bull Connor thought the Negroes should just be happy with segregation.  Never mind the fact that government agencies are beholden to high first amendment burdens and among them are protections for people engaging in whistleblowing and making statements in the public interest (which protects government workers).  But given the amount of law breaking by government in the last two plus years, backed by judges acting to protect their own human rights violations, it is no wonder that Eric "Bull Connor" Adams feels comfortable with his totalitarian behavior.

A New York City mother who worked for the city was fired after she protested the mask mandate for toddlers at mayor Eric Adams' Monday press conference.

Daniela Jampel, an assistant corporation attorney for the city, was terminated from her job shortly after she criticized Adams for not removing the school masking requirement for children under 5-years-old.

and

"Three weeks ago, you told parents to trust you that you would unmask our toddlers," Jampel told Adams. "You stood right here, and you said that the masks would come off April 4. That has not happened."

Well you SHOULD have asked him AND the other candidates about the medical segregation and voted only for those who were against it. But then they might have had to vote Republican. Can't do that now.

"As Jampel tried to get an answer, Adams became frustrated but allowed her to continue but urged her to "come to a conclusion." City Hall staffers had attempted to cut her off upon the realization that she was not a member of the media."

You know that whole "petition government to redress grievances" thing does apply you know...

""Today's events, however, which include her decision to lie to City Hall staff and state she was a journalist at a press conference, demonstrate a disturbing lack of judgment and integrity,""

So the person trying to hold Bull Connor Adams to his supposed word lacks "judgment and integrity".

I see.

Upholding medical segregation, while carving out exceptions for celebrities and the like shows good judgement and integrity.

I see.

"City sources told the Post that the decision to fire Jampel was made Friday after she wrote a tweet blasting Adams for continuing to force toddlers to wear masks and said her city job consisted of defending "cops who lie in court, teachers who molest children, prison guards who beat inmates.""

 So which part of the tweet was a lie? 

Not to worry though, the Negroes of NYC will join with the libs on the upper west side to vote for Adams in the next election though.  Even when he treats 'em like blacks in the segregated south.

Garvey's Ghost TV 4-4-2022: The Pedos Are Out

 In this episode we examine:

 *The Walt Disney Corp's support for pedophiles and child groomers in schools (often one and the same).

*CT School Nurse outs CT school groomers.

*Biden admin goes in on child abuse and mutilation

*Florida teachers quit over new law. 

*Ohio substitute teacher seeking new victims.

Bitchute:

Rumble:

The Djokovic Curse

 So recall that Novak Djokovic declined the COVID shots and was detained in and deported from Australia when he tried to enter the country in order to participate in the Open. Many of his peers scolded him for "not doing his part" to "keep people safe" and for not acquiescing to the totalitarian COVID rules enacted by the state of Australia. Although I agree that countries have an absolute right to determine the conditions of entry, we know full well that these COVID rules have nothing to do with health. In fact they said so. Their decision was based on the fact that such "open rebellion" could cause general social unrest as people saw that others were not cooperating.  Well now that the weather is improving in the northern hemisphere, sports are starting up and the vaccine victims continue to pile up. Now we have a report from the tennis world:

Tennis fans are upset and the sporting world is reeling after an unprecedented number of players either withdrew or retired from the Miami Open this week. A total of 15 players were unable to finish, including the male and female favorites to win.

Folks, this is not normal in the least bit. The original report from Free West Media:

In the men’s tournament, the Italian phenomenon Jannik Sinner was forced to withdraw. He gave up after 22 minutes in the game against Francisco Cerundolo, the number 103 in the world ranking. “When I served at 3-1 and 30-0, I saw him bend over. It was very strange,” Cerundolo said during an interview. “I hope he’s okay, he’s a great player.”

This stuff was posted April 2 so it's not a April Fool's day joke.

Not saying that players don't drop out or have illnesses mid tournament.

I'm not even discussing the cyclists who have had heart issues, which is contrary to what you'd think given the stresses of bike racing, is VERY rare.

I wish these athletes well but if it goes badly for them: 1) They agreed to it and those that spoke ill of Djokovic will owe him an apology.