In the above video the not so bright Hakeem Jeffries attempts to make a point about white heavily armed white men who were arrested "without incident". He is so dense that he doesn't realize that he answered his own question when he said "without incident". The vast majority of police killings of both armed and unarmed people happen when the suspect resists arrest. As if ti's some kind of option. If the person doesn't resist arrest there is a 99% chance that they will not be killed during the arrest. I say 99% because there have, in fact, been cases where unarmed people who have followed directions have been killed. In most, if not all of those cases, the police gave conflicting orders. See, too many people are too damn slow, and not too bright to understand that the initial reason for the contact is often NOT the reason for the killing. Often it is what happens afterwards, which usually starts with someone saying "I'm not gonna..." Another example of this is the recent shooting of an unarmed motorist on New Jersey's Garden State Parkway. In that situation Maurice Gordon the driver had been clocked doing 100 on the GSP which has a top speed limit of 65 and people generally go about 80. He pulled over on the wrong side of the road. The officer treated him with nothing but respect and courtesy. He called a tow truck for Maurice and even offered to drop him off somewhere. Of importance was that since Maurice Gordon pulled over on the wrong side, both his and the state trooper's vehicles were partially in the high speed passing lane. This is a very dangerous situation. Near the end of the video about time index 36:00 Maurice decided to exit the trooper's vehicle after being offered a mask and get into a fight with the state trooper. Do you realize that Maurice could have easily pushed the state trooper into oncoming traffic? Do you realize that the state trooper could have lost his footing during the fight and fell into the lane of traffic and been hit and run over? That is why an "unarmed person" is not necessarily NOT A THREAT to your life and why the entire "unarmed black man" theme is fraudulent. Those of us who do martial arts know that all it takes is one "proper" hit to do serious bodily harm or even death. We are not impressed by the "unarmed" claim because we know better. The general public doesn't understand this. Neither does Jeffries. Don't be stupid like Jeffries.This moment from @RepJeffries going after @dbongino is absurd. He repeatedly brings up white terrorists and their skin color and when pressed by Dan on why he's making it racial, Jeffries says "Black Lives Matter."
— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) June 10, 2020
Dan has to remind him: "I arrested those people, you did not." pic.twitter.com/lG6pENHJ9q