Palestine Hightlights 'Conservative" Racial Blindspot

 I recall when the whole Trayvon Martin killing occured. As I saw the facts come out, I saw many so called dissident conservatives saying that the killing of Trayvon was justified because Trayvon attacked Zimmerman. It was as if the entire event only started with the fight. Even to this day they still mis-represent the case and of course now use the trial as proof. Never mind that a trial was NOT proof enough in the case of OJ Simpson.

The facts of the case, for those unfamiliar are as follows:

Trayvon was visiting his father. Trayvon went to the local "bodega" to get some skittles and Iced Tea or some other drink. That detail is unimportant. Last I checked going to and from a store was not a sign of criminal activity.

On the way back from the store, Zimmerman saw Trayvon and decided to follow him. He followed close enough that Trayvon noticed. In court testimony it was revealed that he told a friend on the phone that he was being followed by a "creepy ass cracker" or something close to that effect.

Again, walking down the street, while on the phone is not a crime or reasonable suspicion of a crime. It's your right. Now a normal person, even if they suspected wrongdoing or potential wrongdoing would follow the person but not engage unless they saw an actual crime. Zimmerman however decided to not only follow Trayvon (stalking) but then exited his vehicle to confront Trayvon who was doing nothing wrong.

Trayvon, fearing for his life, decided to take on his stalker. He failed and died.

I would absolutely put hard cash down that if the races were reversed, Zimmerman would have been the dead hero who thwarted the attempts of a black assailant to rob him.

Some commentators went to such lengths to say that Trayvon should have identified himself to Zimmerman as if black people need to explain there presence to random white people on demand.

According to these conservatives if you have the position I do, it must be some BLM informed position. No, BLM is a fraud organization and Trayvon is still  the victim.

So conservatives wonder why they can't get blacks to support them when they get obvious stuff like this wrong. 

Similarly white conservatives cannot fathom why black people do not have a dim view of Mumia Abu Jamaal or Assata Shakur. They are aghast that these two shot police. Since these conservatives worship at the feet of police, many of whom turned on them when those lock downs happened, they cannot fathom how blacks could be friendly to someone who shot at them. For these conservatives, black persons who had run in with police must be criminals. Jan 6 notwithstanding.

These conservatives act as if COINTELPRO was (and is) not a thing. That many police, particularly at that time were hostile to black movements and often had standing orders to liquidate them.

These conservatives want us to act like Fred Hampton wasn't shot in his bed or Philly literally dropped a bomb on a house.

Now we have the attack on Israel by Hamas. As is the case for the occupied government that is the US, supposed US representatives went out of their way to support Israel and whatever they do in response. One such representative actually wore the military uniform of a foreign government (guess) to the chamber of government.

But the point here is that so called conservatives, were quick to denoun anyone who had any critique of Israel, including the fact that Israel didn't exist prior to 1948 and perhaps THAT is THE source of the problem.

They don't want to hear any of that.

The problem here is that black Americans remember this thing called slavery and segregation. They supported the ANC. Gaza  and the West Bank are no different from Bantustans. Colonialism went out of style in the 1960s and Israel is effectively the last European colony (It was ruled by the British). Supporting colonialism is simply not going to fly with African-Americans. To be frank, it shouldn't fly with anybody.

But these so called conservatives who uphold property rights, can't be bothered with discussing how people's property was taken to create Israel. And they think they are going to win black votes with this attitude?

Which brings me to a question. Why this blind spot. Would any of these conservatives argue FOR apartheid South Africa today?  A recolonization of Kenya, Uganda, Ghana? Perhaps Nigeria?

I don't think they would but perhaps I give them too much credit. So, if they wouldn't argue for such a thing why do they support the colonization of Palestine?

Ah yes, Arabs. MUSLIMS and the fear of Jihad. Well you know Steve Sailor talks about Invade the world, invite the world. You don't have to do either of them. Of course some of these conservatives have their attitude because they are Christians and they are looking for the second coming. Which of course will lead to the eternal damnation of the non-believers. Including Jews...

Yeah, I'm not dumb enough to support Democrats at the ballot box but don't mistake that for support for colonialism or Zionism. To be honest conservatives ought not have allowed BLM or Antifa to capture that argument. 

History shows that oppression breeds violence. Not everyone goes silently into that great goodnight. For me, or any black person to deny that would be to deny Nat Turner and other slave uprisings that took "innocent lives".  Republicans are not going to win over any formerly colonized or enslaved people by supporting a colony without exception. 

Perhaps Republicans and conservatives are OK with not gaining ground with that group. In such a case, there is always expanding the share of the white vote. Just allow it to get bad enough for them before you run out of them to "share".

Garvey's Ghost Palestine Peace Plan

 Here is The Ghost's proposed peace plan for Palestine.

1) There is a One State solution. There is no "State of Israel". There is no "State of Palestine". There is a state with an agreed upon name. I suggest "Judea" or "Jerusalem" or something else historical to both parties.

2) The Bantustans are ended. Palestinians are 1005 free to live and conduct their business as any other citizen of the state of [enter name from item 1].

3) Land Justice:

   A) Palestinians are to be compensated for the land taken from them to create what was previously Israel.To that end there are 2 options:

    1) Payment at current land and/or property value to whoever owned the land prior to 1948. In the case that person is dead, their immediate family can be paid. This can be split among siblings.

    2) Rental payment to previous Palestinian owners at market rates. As with item one descendants can be paid where the previous owner is deceased.

3) Failing to abide by items One or Two, Settler family or their descendants must vacate the premises. Where the prior owner is unknown or cannot be found, the funds will go to establish a bank available to the previously disenfranchised.

In return. Hamas, Palestinian Authority, Islamic Jihad and whatever other armed group is to be disbanded. Any person found to be a member of such a group after the agreement is in effect shall be executed.

Once the agreement is settled, the border of the state shall be recognized by all parties, aggression against this state shall be condemned and any retaliation recognized as justified. This includes atomic and other mass destruction weapons.

Religious and ethnic based violence will not be tolerated. Any party engaging in such violence shall be executed. In cases where that person is caught *in the act* such execution shall be summary and immediate.

Once agreed upon, "bygones are bygones". Any party found to be conspiring for retaliation due to pre-agreement incidents will be imprisoned and their all assets confiscated.

At the implementation of The Agreement, the current government is dissolved. A caretaker government will run for 6 months, in order for elections to be held. This caretaker government shall only do as much as is necessary to run the government. No legislation shall be passed (other than needed to run the government) until the new government is seated.

 

Of course there are details to be hashed out but this is the most equitable solution that addresses the root cause of the conflict.

Garvey's Ghost TV 10-10-2023: Palestine

Rumble:

BitChute:

 

Getting to the root of the problem.

No One Is Above The Law

 

 

Hey NYS AG: Since nobody is above the law and Louis has actual evidence of fraud, When can we expect the prosecutions?

Garvey's Ghost TV 10-7-2023: Foolishness and Frauds

Rumble:

BitChute

3:00: Trump Trial Frauds
13:00: Pythago-what?
20:00: OSHA: "It Wasn't Me!"
36:39: Nobel Prize For COVID Shot
40:00: "Migrant Crisis": Follow The Money
55:00:  Commie "Camps" go Mainstream among Democrats

Tucker: Trans Inc

Ep. 28 Trans, Inc: genital mutilation is not just a fad. It’s a full-blown industry. How did something this demented happen so quickly? Chris Moritz has been following the money. pic.twitter.com/N2em2hbTE8

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) October 4, 2023

The Last Duel: Trump And Brand

 

 I like movies about "the old world". Master and Commander is one of my favourites. Another one I like is The Last Duel.

Confess!

One of the reasons I like these movies is it shows just how easy life is for both men and women relative to the past.  It's the same reason I use thoughts about US slavery as a motivator for my runs and workouts. This ain't hard. Slavery is hard. These kinds of things give one perspective. 

For those unfamiliar with the movie, the essential plot is that there is an accusation of rape. In that day rape of a woman was a property crime against her male "owner" which would be her father or husband. If that case was not resolved "judicially" then a duel would ensue between the offended parties. If the woman's defender was killed in the duel, she would be seen as a liar and burnt alive. 

Talk about incentives.

In such a society making certain accusations carried a high penalty. You couldn't call someone a rapist, in public and get away with it. Men who may consider raping a woman had to consider that they might end up dead by means of public impalement. Men involved with women had to consider that if such an accusation was made, they may have to fight to the death. Knowing this, one would have to seriously consider the morals of a potential wife. A whore wife could literally get you killed.

Today no such risks exist for men or women. But the risk is even less for women. A man who is accused of rape, which is now expansively defined, can have his reputation completely destroyed with no recourse. Even if a trial works out in his favour enough people will still consider him a rapist and that he just got lucky.

Defamation, back in the day, could get one killed via duel as well.

Women, this society is told, should be believed regardless of evidence short of video. Punishment against the accused should and will begin before a trial. And that assumes there is a trial.  Now, if a the accused denies the charge, never brought to a court of law, he can be sued for defamation. This is what happened to Trump. He was accused of sexual assault by a woman and he denied it quite vigorously. For this he was sued and the woman won. Because she was defamed as if HE was not defamed by the charge *that was never proven beyond reasonable doubt*.

In the time of The Duel, Not only would Trump be able to ultimately "fight it out" but that woman would have risked being burnt to death.  Do you honestly think she would have risked that back then?

Now we have Brand who has been accused in multiple media outlets of rape of multiple women. Unnamed as far as I know at this writing. Youtube, a Google company, well Alphabet, demonetized his videos and a UK minister actually wrote to other social media companies asking them to ban Brand as well.

Mind you, this is over accusations. Nothing founded, never charged and for events that are, to my understanding at least a decade old.  So now we are at a point where an accusation produces punishment of the accused (sometimes by the same government that would be charged with providing a fair trial!) while hiding and protecting the accuser. 

This underscores my point for a long time that one of the major reasons the US is going to shit is because there are no consequences for bad behaviors by the ruling class and women, in US society are quickly becoming a Ruling Class. Since there are no consequences to leveling false charges against people/enemies, there is no incentive to not do it. If a case is lost, they have not lost anything. Not even money since they, in government, spend taxpayer money. But lets stick with private accusations.

If the women in both Trump and Brand's case knew they were risking death if shown to be lying or at a minimum could not substantiate their claims, would they have spoken to anyone or sued?

Today we have many ways to prove a rape, in the classic sense, occurred. DNA, cameras to place the victim and assailant in the location. Potentially incriminating text messages, etc. Women who make an accusation that cannot be proven ought to face the same penalties the accused would have received. Rape claims made decades after the fact should be treated as libel and defamation against the accused unless actual evidence can be offered.

While private companies are free to do what they like, they should seriously reconsider supporting this "punish the accused" culture that has grown in the past decade. They should consider how they would like it if they were accused of some wrong doing and as a result were, say, de-listed from the stock exchange(s) and had all banking services cut off from them.  I'm pretty certain they would not care for that one bit.

Do unto others...

Why Trump Keeps Pushing The Shot

I saw someone expressing frustration that Trump keeps talking up the "vaccine" at his rallies. I had wondered the same thing for a while. After all Fauci is not popular among his "base" and neither are the mandates. Nor the lock-downs. So why even remind people of The Shot? Then I saw another comment.

"Trump is talking to Democrats and others outside the party and MAGA".

And they are absolutely correct. Trump has the Republican nomination on lock. Short of some "black swan" event. Trump is not losing the primary.  It is not unusual for the primary winner to move his or her messaging to those who may be persuadable in contested venues. Trump is just doing that earlier than is usual given the unusual circumstances he finds himself.

The reason why some anti-shot people don't get that is because, to an extent we live in a bubble. We "no shot" people are an extremely small population. 95% of the population took the shot. Many if not most of them voluntarily did it.  There is no political win to bad talk the shot to that population no matter how correct you may be. To a population that still believes these shots are effective and actually saved lives, taking credit for getting it out, quickly, is a plus.

Where Trump is vulnerable on the subject, even among the persuadable class, is the lockdown. It is clear that Trump essentially handed the power to Fauci and Birx. Reading Scott Atlas' book, makes it clear thaty Birx and Fauci had an agenda and I personally think should be executed via firing squad. But this abdication of leadership to these people highlights a major Trump weakness:

Poor staffing decisions.

Trump is too easily impressed by people, shocking given his "Apprentice" persona. Per the nature of his business he has to trust the people he delegates responsibility to. In a private business, if those people fail, at worst the business fails and that's it. When it comes to national office, that kind of fail, destroys the country. Stakes are way too high for those kinds of mistakes.

And this brings us to another problem. Lets say there is another Trump term. Who is going to staff it? After seeing what Democrats have done with the "justice system" [sic] who's willing to risk working for Trump? And if there are people with sense who would work for Trump, would he be bright enough to hire them? I honestly don't know.

Anyway, the point here is that, you (likely) and I may know that these shots are far more dangerous than COVID for the vast majority of the population, but that knowledge is not shared by much of the public. For them shots and boosters are "science" that is saving millions of lives. In that kind of environment, talking up the shots is a political winner.

Garvey's Ghost TV 9-15-2023: Learn From The Civil Rights Movement

 Rumble:

Bitchute

Discussion on human nature and how to resist the growing tyranny

We Used To Have Work When The Whites Were In Charge

 A devastating article in Der Speigel on current day South Africa.

"9910. That was the train I used to take to work every day. The last one ran six years ago," an aging Black man says in disgust as he walks past the station entrance. He adds caustically: "We used to have work when the whites were in charge, and life was better."

It’s hard to believe: A 60-year-old Black man, who was oppressed and exploited for half his life, misses the Apartheid era?

I remember when Apartheid ended. My peers and I were all "black man's time now". And how South Africa would show the world how it could be done. We were annoyed, to put it mildly about the Truth and Reconciliation committee and the entire idea of forgiving anyone who confessed.

Much later did  I come to understand WHY they were done. America had a similar outcome to it's civil war, hence the statues and names that have now been vilified and destroyed by those who know nothing but revenge and what they *think* is justice.

A few years ago when we were all deprived of our right to assemble (COVID lockdowns) I ran across many documentaries that shows just how bad a vast majority of black people have it outside of the United States. I posted a series because at the time with the dumb deification of George Floyd, so many people were talking about how "oppressed" they are. 

You don't know oppression. Most of you don't even know poverty.

Franz Fanon discussed the native "middle class" and their problems. This article is a prime example of what Fanon was discussing. This is BLM "leadership" on a national level.

The lesson here, which may come to late for America, is that this dumb "woke" leadership will destroy a modern country. NYC is finding out the hard way how symbolic "anti-racism" comes to bite you in the butt. Whereas South Africa had a revolution that put incompetent and corrupt people into power, America is voluntarily going down this road. And here's the thing, The further down the road you go, the harder it is to stop and reverse course. The more drastic the actions have to be. Most people don't have the stomach to do what needed to be done 20 years ago, what makes you think they currently have the stomach to do MORE than was required then?

David Knight Show on RICO

 

 

INTERVIEW - Dangerous Precedents of RICO Indictment

Garveys Ghost TV 9-4-2023: You Trust The System?

Rumble

BitChute

3:30: NJ COVID Lawbreaking "settlement"
19:00: FDA Sued.
27:00 Backpack Kid.
45:00: Another Federal Judge Caping for Pedos.
56:00: NY Voters Keep shafting Themselves with their Sanctuary City.

What's Mine Is Mine and What's Yours Is Mine

 This is the ideology of communists. NYC is run by communists. Yes, Eric Adams is a communist.

When you read that text you see the following:

"Hochul has faced pressure from municipal leaders, including in the political battleground in the Hudson Valley, to curb the busing of migrants into their communities."

See, NYC now reaping what they sewed when they declared itself a "Sanctuary City" where "Migrants are Welcome Here", thinks that your property, outside NYC, where you didn't do that dumb shit, is THEIR property.

"I think the governor’s wrong,” the mayor said. “She’s the governor of the state of New York. New York City is in that state.\county in this state should be part of this.”"

In other words Adams thinks it appropriate to use the force of the state to overrule the will of people NOT in NYC.

"Adams has recently urged Hochul to issue a statewide order that would bar municipalities from trying to block the arrival of migrants through local edicts.

See, these people who talk about how Orange Man is a threat to democracy openly use the state to override the democratic will of those who oppose them. The municipalities went through their legal processes  to decide to not violate federal law. Adams doesn't approve and so wants to override the "democratic process."

Don't worry, NYC residents will continue to vote for these Democrats though. Orange Man [Party] Bad.

Garvey's Ghost TV 8-28-2023: Medical Malpractice

 Rumble

BitChute

 

 7:03 New COVID Variant. "Vaccinated" Vulnerable.
19:20" ModRNA sRNA
29:00: What's This in the Pfizer Insert?
39:00 For The Want of a Vagina a Life Was Lost
50:00: Dollar Getting BRIC[ed]

Thank You Larry Elder

Larry Elder checked Charlemagne the God .🤣🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/sgcRRiRbmN

— HotepDrelly 🇺🇸 (@Drellyhotep) August 17, 2023

Election Breach! Oh Noes!

 So CNN put out an article about the GA prosecutor looking to bring a case against Trump.

Well this sounds serious. Voting System breach? That sounds really serious. I would think the average person reading that headline would think that the Trump team had breached the voting system during the election which lead to false output.

"CNN — 

Atlanta-area prosecutors investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia are in possession of text messages and emails directly connecting members of Donald Trump’s legal team to the early January 2021 voting system breach in Coffee County, sources tell CNN."

"January 2021 voting system breach". 

January. Wouldn't that be after the ballot casting was done? Why yes. Ballots were cast on Nov 3. So whatever this "breach" is, it didn't occur during the casting of ballots. It would also appear that this breach occurred after the counting. Still though, if there was a "breach" of voting systems, then we should know who did it. After all, voting systems should not be breached by unauthorized parties.

"Trump allies attempted to access voting systems after the 2020 election as part of the broader push to produce evidence that could back up the former president’s baseless claims of widespread fraud."

Interesting. So Trump's allies were trying to find (produce) evidence of voter fraud. In the process they "attempted to access voting systems". I see. So they hired a hacker or some other "black hat" group to "breach" the voting systems? Is that what we're alleging?

"Since then, new evidence has slowly been uncovered about the role of Trump’s attorneys, the operatives they hired and how the breach, as well as others like it in other key states, factored into broader plans for overturning the election."

 "Operatives they hired..." Perhaps a clandestine hacking group. This may be a serious problem.

"Together, the text messages and other court documents show how Trump lawyers and a group of hired operatives sought to access Coffee County’s voting systems in the days before January 6, 2021,"

 Lawyers and "operatives". Oh my. Trump got his lawyers to get some "operatives" to "Breach" the voting system in order to "produce evidence".  This is sounding really bad for Trump.

"Six days before pro-Trump operatives gained unauthorized access to voting systems, the local elections official who allegedly helped facilitate the breach sent a “written invitation” to attorneys working for Trump, according to text messages obtained by CNN."

Operatives gained "unauthorized access" to voting systems...had been given a "written invitation"?

"On January 1, 2021 – days ahead of the January 7 voting systems breach – Katherine Friess – an attorney working with Giuliani, Sidney Powell and other Trump allies shared a “written invitation” to examine voting systems in Coffee County with a group of Trump allies.

So there was a "written invitation' to examine voting systems in a county. 

"Investigators have scrutinized the actions of various individuals who were involved, including Misty Hampton, a former Coffee County elections official who authored the letter of invitation referenced in text messages and other documents that have been turned over to prosecutors, multiple sources told CNN."

So a county election official, Misty Hampton, wrote a "letter of invitation" to the Trump team to examine the voting systems.

If you have an invite to enter a place then you have NOT breached it. 

There is no breach.

At worst, Misty Hampton did not have the authority to write such a letter or grant permission to examine voting systems. THAT would be a charge against her, not Trump or his team.

"During that same meeting, Giuliani alluded to a plan to gain “voluntary access” to machines in Georgia, according to testimony from him and others before the House January 6 committee."

"Gain voluntary access..." 

A "breach" is not "voluntary access".
"

 She and another location elections official, Cathy Latham, allegedly helped Trump operatives gain access to the county’s voting systems, according to documents, testimony and surveillance video produced as part of a long-running civil lawsuit focused on election security in Georgia. 

Latham, who also served as a fake elector from Georgia after the 2020 election, has come under scrutiny for her role in the Coffee County breach after surveillance video showed she allowed unauthorized outsiders to spend hours examining voting systems there."

Again. If the county official invites your team to examine the voting system then you have not "breached" the voting system. There is no breach as far as this report goes. There *may* be officials who overstepped their authority. But that falls on the official, not the people they duped into believing they had the authority to do what they did.

This goes back to the Jan 6 prosecutions. When the videos came out on Tucker, I wrote about it. I mentioned that the key issue was whether the person knew they were trespassing. When the police were walking Shaman around the capitol building had they informed him that he was not authorized? These points matter. If the Trump team went to the extent of getting a "written invite" to examine the voting machines, then there is no criminal intent, and thus no crime.

The problem is that the justice system [sic] is so corrupted, that obvious stuff like this will still make it to a grand jury, a grand jury will indict (because orange man bad) and judges won't throw out these obviously fake charges and juries will convict. When the appeal finally gets it right, the defendant is drained of resources, had their reputation damaged and the people responsible will not have any accountability to deal with.

So They Weren't "Rational" After All

 A particularly devastating piece in Spiked on how so called "rational atheist" fell in line for the tranny movement.

The swiftness of the rise of the "Trans" movement caught a lot of people by surprise. Those who follow Steve Sailer would be notable exceptions.  A lot of the irrationality of the current"trans" trend can be tied to the COVID response. This is because during COVID, authority figures discovered that not only could they tell outright lies to the public without fear of consequences, they found they could leverage the power of government to enforce those lies. Social media companies volunteered themselves as enforcers of the movement silencing all dissent.

One example in this article is a note about Tyson The Clown, whom I did an entire video on:

"We’ve witnessed Neil deGrasse Tyson, America’s best-known scientist, bow to the creed of gender-as-feeling. In a TikTok video he said ‘XX/XY chromosomes are insufficient’ when it comes to reading someone’s sex, because what people feel matters along with their biology."

That commentary only solidified the point I made about Tyson. 

The other salient point made in the piece is how by embracing the tranny nonsense, The New Atheists showed that they were more interested in destroying religion (Christianity in particular) than about rationalism. This, I believe is shared with the entire LMNOP movement. They don't go to Muslim bakeries or website designers, etc. They don't go after Jewish bakeries, etc. They always go after the Christian.

I fell into that trap. I could, and can, critique Christianity all day long. I don't bother, unless asked, because it doesn't serve a purpose other than to show off what I know. My position became that if it helps you to be the best you, knock yourself out. I'm not looking for converts and I'm not approval seeking.

Ultimately the LMNOP crowd is approval seeking and they are very bad at handling rejection. Hence they have co-opted government and private businesses to wage economic warfare on those who do not approve. Again, they learned they could do this, successfully, during COVID.

So go read the piece. Well worth the time.

Imagine That....

It's called Revealed Preferences.

Garvey's Ghost TV 8-3-2023: Another Trump Indictment

Rumble:

BitChute:

 Longish review of the Trump "Jan 6" indictment. Did the DOJ open the door to it's own demise?

Garvey's Ghost TV 7-23-2023: Affirmative Nonsense

Rumble

Bitchute 

 

1:30 Brief commentary on WSOP

7:00: Speeding Tickets: The "New" Tax Revenue.

21:00: Affirmatively Dumbing Down.

28:00: Black Doctors admitting their incompetence?

43:00: Openly Admitting to Child Mutilation. Because They Can.

49:00: Muslim City Council Handles Their Business.

57:00 NYC Reaps What They Sow. It'll Get Worse.

There Will Be No Dissent

 The current so called "wokeness" of the left is often described as a religion. In the religious realm there are fast truths that come from God and anything else is rebellion against God. There is nothing to discuss because there is right and wrong. Period. The current climate around LMNOP is that it is "right" and hence unquestionable. There is no valid dissent. Witness:

Now you would think that a place that trades in "news" would be doing something called "Jounralism" where you get all sides of a story. But the LMNOP crowd says there is no other side. But above and beyond that, if you dare claim there is another side you should be fired.

What's that about power? Institutional power?

"Two news directors at a Michigan NBC affiliate were ousted on Thursday following the circulation of an internal memo calling for scaled-back coverage of Pride Month events and directing the station’s journalists to “get both sides” on LGBTQ issues, a source with knowledge of the situation told CNN."

Ousted for blasphemy against the new religion?

“We need to recognize that some stories related to LGBTQ issues are going to be controversial and polarizing in our community,” the memo sent by Fox said. “While you personally may not agree with a certain position, people are entitled to their opinions and they are our viewers.”

I suppose Stanton did not get the memo about the current religion. You are not entitled to your opinion about LMNOP. You will be told what to think about LMNOP and you will say what you are told. Silence is violence.

"The memo sparked fierce backlash from the newsroom’s staff, prompting the station’s owner, Texas-based Nexstar, to launch an investigation into the matter. "

Personally, I would have fired the lot of them but I suppose that's why I don't run things anywhere. But this decision came out of Texas?

"In a statement to CNN earlier this month, Nexstar said the email was “not consistent with Nexstar’s values, the way we cover the news, or the respect we have for our viewers” and apologized for offending members of the LGBTQ community and WOOD-TV’s viewers."

So the viewers who have positions not approved by the "news" staff are either not viewers or ARE viewers but not deserving of "respect" if that "respect" offends the LMNOP. And say, what are those "values?

Like I said about the NAACP, someone needs to ask them exactly what their values are. Do they approve of child grooming? Do they approve of sexual behaviour in front of children? Do they approve of child mutilation. No way no how should these corporations be let off the hook when they talk about "their values" in reference to LMNOP.

"On Thursday, Gary Weitman, a Nexstar spokesperson, confirmed to CNN that the company had made changes to WOOD-TV’s newsroom leadership team to “ensure its ability to continue providing outstanding local news coverage and service to the Grand Rapids community and surrounding area.”"

So this company, based in Texas, made changes to the leadership team of Lansing MICHIGAN, to better reflect it's "Texas values"?

Interesting indeed.

There will be no dissent to the new overlords. They learned from COVID that they can fire people at will with no fear.

Garvey's Ghost TV 6-30-2023: 303 Creative Decision

Rumble:

 Bitchute:

 Discussion of the. 303 Creative decision. Why I believe it's a 13th Amendment issue.

More Ramifications of CBDC

 Nigel Faraj has had his bank account closed. Below he discusses it. The most important part he brings up is how in the modern system not having a bank account makes one a non-person. Even in remote parts of Africa, people use cell phones to transact business. You really need to understand this threat. You may be 'safe" today but the line(s) are always moving. 

Garvey's Ghost TV 6-26-23: I Tried To Warn Y'all

Rumble:

Bitchute:

More Alphabet Mafia laying the legal foundations.

3:30: Wokeness will get you killed. But You'll be inspired.
8:00: I Warned You. Laying The Legal Foundations. Florida and NJ
30:11: A plea to sane Democrats.
34:00: Scientists shook by dissenters having a voice.
43:00: Historical Boycotts and Why The Bud Light situation could turn out badly for conservatives.

An Example of Why CBDC Is Going To Be Really Bad

 I spoke about CBDC before. I discussed how it would be programmable and be able to deny you access to all kinds of things that the "bank" decides you shouldn't have for whatever reason.

Louis Rossmann has a nice example of what to expect:

This is just Amazon but think about it. Those smart meters connected to your house. Flick of a switch and you have no power. No need to send a worker to the property. Banks closing accounts,. Credit cards declined. Expiring money. 

Because you had the wrong opinion. 

And lets be clear, I don't care IF that guy's door camera DID say something racist. That isn't grounds to disable the property they paid for. 

Oh right, paid for no longer means "owns".

Personally I think Amazon should be sued for this. Of course it would cost an arm and a leg, which is exactly what they want and depend upon. Most people would be bankrupt before the very first court appearance.

The "Trans" Insurance Fraud Racket

 Matt Walsh names the names

"4/ Groner explains that insurance companies won't pay for these surgeries unless the patient is diagnosed with gender dysphoria. So, she says healthcare workers should provide the diagnosis. “We're using that diagnosis,” she says, “to ensure clients get that necessary treatment.""

Now you understand why the Florida judge I discussed in the last GGTV video needed to uphold this nonsense. 

Garvey's Ghost TV 6-6-2023: The Growing Nonsense

 Rumble:

Bitchute:

2:52: The NAACP is a Fraud
15:00: Sea Rise or Land Sink
21:00: Nice School You Got There.
36:00: Vaccine Induced Mycarditis More Confirmation.
43:00: Florida Judge Tries To Set Tranny Precedent

Tulsi Gabbard on The MIC

The warmongers are trying to drag us into WW3, which can only end in one way: nuclear annihilation and the suffering and death of all our loved ones. Zelensky, Biden, NATO, congressional and media neocons are insane. And we are insane if we passively allow them to lead us into… pic.twitter.com/aUEdPFAzoy

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) May 21, 2023

I've long said that Tulsi is one of the (if not the only) sane Democrat out there. She has left the Democratic party because she has recognized that they have gone crazy. I was disappointed when she didn't come down against the Trump impeachment because she had doubts. I was disappointed because:

1) In the American system, all doubt goes in favor of the accused.

2) If you want to be POTUS you have to make a decision. You don't get to sit it out. Anyway, great clip above.,

Mutilate Child, Go To Jail

 My man.

DESANTIS: “If you’re taking off the private parts of some 15-year-old kid, you should go to jail.” pic.twitter.com/l0BvcoekqW

— DeSantis War Room 🐊 (@DeSantisWarRoom) May 19, 2023

 

If this is "sanctimonious" well call me sanctimonious.

Justice Neil Gorsuch Says What Needs To Be Said

 Some of you all may be wondering why I never sued my former employer over my firing over the Trump shot. The reason was that I saw that the courts were in on the blatant disregard of the law and if they were to find in my favor they would also be indicting themselves. This is because they too had imposed such burdens on their employees. Ye olde t"wo wolves and a sheep debate what's for dinner" situation.

 With that said let's look at what Gorsuch has said

:

"the Court took a serious misstep when it effectively allowed nonparties to this case to manip- ulate our docket to prolong an emergency decree designed for one crisis in order to address an entirely different one."

 The nice thing here is that Gorsuch discusses the abuse of emergency decrees.

Since March 2020, we may have experienced the greatest intrusions on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country. Executive officials across the country issued emer- gency decrees on a breathtaking scale. Governors and local leaders imposed lockdown orders forcing people to remain in their homes.13 They shuttered businesses and schools, public and private.14 They closed churches even as they al- lowed casinos and other favored businesses to carry on.15 They threatened violators not just with civil penalties but with criminal sanctions too.1

 I noted the way the states acted to criminalize things like walking down the street and not wearing a face diaper. It was quite revealing to see so called "black leaders' like Ras Baraka and Eric Adams have black people arrested for "being outside" and supporting medical segregation.

Federal executive officials entered the act too. Not just with emergency immigration decrees. They deployed a public-health agency to regulate landlord-tenant relations nationwide.19 They used a workplace-safety agency to issue a vaccination mandate for most working Americans.20

An absolute abuse of power as well as a usurpation of power that had no constitutional basis.

"Along the way, it seems federal officials may have pressured social-media companies to suppress information about pandemic policies with which they disagreed.23"

I know all about that. I stopped posting to YouTube for this very reason.

"Courts bound to protect our liberties addressed a few—but hardly all—of the intrusions upon them. In some cases, like this one, courts even allowed themselves to be used to perpetuate emergency public-health decrees for collateral purposes, itself a form of emergency-lawmaking- by-litigation."

Like I said in the opening.

Garvey's Ghost TV 5-17-2023: The Durham Report

 Rumble:

Bitchute:

Not So Sanctuary

I thought that “sanctuary city” was a moral and financial good. For years Democrats have boldly stated that “immigrants are welcome here” as they declared places they run as “sanctuary cities” and ‘Sanctuary states”. This reference echos back to fugitive slave laws of the past (and perhaps things like the underground railroad) where those fleeing the persecution of the law could be sheltered by those who opposed those laws. As usual this emotional blackmail covers the fact that the two eras and circumstances are nothing alike.

Most of us who have a clue object to the ideas that the government should be:

1) Undermining the immigration law passed by the duly elected representatives on the country.
2) Using the taxes raised [by force] off of citizens that should be going to the benefit of said citizens, on persons who should not even be in the country.

The Dems response to that is:

You’re a racist for saying that.

I’m sure Barbara Jordan would agree.

So long as illegal aliens were invading southern states, mostly northern states, and their urban mayors could not resist painting the leadership in those locations, so long as they were Republicans, as racist, white supremacists for opposing said invasion. They went so far as to misrepresent border patrol agents on horseback as literal “crackers” in their successful attempt to oust Trump from the White House. Now that the border states and Florida, have sent the illegal aliens to various blue states, the Democrats running those places are singing a brand new tune.

“Officials representing some New York suburbs have rebuked New York City Mayor Eric Adams' plan to send migrants to their towns for shelter.”

Wait. NYC is a sanctuary city. Why would Eric [Bull Connor] Adams be sending “migrants” to places that are NOT NYC?

““The City declared itself a Sanctuary City in December of 2016 committing itself to supporting undocumented individuals “

That declaration had the following title:

"Resolution affirming that despite president-elect Donald Trump's senseless threats, New York City will remain a Sanctuary City for immigrant residents."

So the entire premise of the “sanctuary city” was to spite Trump.

Orange Man Bad.

I said at the time that when Trump got into office, one of his highest priorities should have been prosecuting each and every city, including the officials, who declared themselves sanctuary cities. It is a federal crime to aide and abet illegal aliens to enter or stay in the country. That includes providing the means to stay in the country.

1907. TITLE 8, U.S.C. 1324(A) OFFENSES

“Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).”

and

“Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.”

So by openly declaring “sanctuary cities” these jurisdictions admitted to breaking federal law and since it was a group of them then it is a corrupt organization and RICO charges should be applied.
Of course Trump was (and is) all bark and no bite on these things failed to do this. Sessions thought it better to spend his time defending confiscation of peoples money (and other properties) for crimes they had not been charged with, much less convicted of. 

In the case of NY, the people who declared their intention to break federal law, put their names to the documented conspiracy:

Melissa Mark-Viverito, Brad S. Lander, Carlos Menchaca, Ben Kallos, Laurie A. Cumbo, Antonio Reynoso, Stephen T. Levin, Jumaane D. Williams, Rafael L. Espinal, Jr., Helen K. Rosenthal, Julissa Ferreras-Copeland, Margaret S. Chin, Rory I. Lancman, Deborah L. Rose, I. Daneek Miller, Ydanis A. Rodriguez, Mark Levine, Mark Treyger, Daniel R. Garodnick, Rosie Mendez, Costa G. Constantinides, Peter A. Koo

So it’s not like they had to figure out who was in on it. They told on themselves. But that’s not the point of this post.

“On Friday, Adams announced he was sending migrants to neighboring New York counties in response to the rising numbers of asylum seekers arriving in the city, which is reportedly overwhelming the city's shelter system.”

“Overwhelming the city’s shelter system”? I wonder if any of the geniuses that made that resolution had considered this. I suppose not because they, far away from a border that doesn’t require an airport to get to, didn’t think they would actually have to act on this. See JFK and LaGuardia airport are borders and only so many people can afford to fly in and then overstay their visa. So it acts as a kind of control. But busses arriving from the south? Ain’t no passport check at the GWB, Lincoln or Holland tunnels.

““Despite calling on the federal government for a national decompression strategy since last year, and for a decompression strategy across the state, New York City has been left without the necessary support to manage this crisis,"”

Now they want a strategy? I thought that was racist. Also, when they made that dumb resolution didn’t anyone consider, you know, costs? More traffic cams to tax drivers I suppose.

““It is clear that the immigration crisis created by the federal government has negatively impacted Orange County,” Orange County executive Steven Neuhaus and Town of Newburgh supervisor Gil Piaquadio said in a statement. "It is a self-induced problem created by lack of planning and continues to burden our taxpayers."”

Oh it’s not “lack of planning.” Trust.

“"The Rockland County executive has sadly already shown he is not a leader this state needs," Levy said. "Instead, we’ve been met with racist rhetoric and reprehensible threats from the head of a county that will be tasked with caring for less than one-fourth of 1% of the asylum seekers who have come to New York City, and, once again, New York would be paying for shelter, food, and services.””

“Racist rhetoric.”

Of course.

That’s all they have. Do as we say or you’re racist.

Garvey's Ghost TV: 5-8-2023: Propagandizing Nonsense

 Rumble:

Bitchute:

Subject matter:

3:10 The Covid Emergency is silently ended. No consequences.
8:10 A 2A Liability Suggestion.
12:38 Taxing the "under $400,000.
18:48  A New Yorker and Her Money Are Soon Parted.
34:09 The AP Propaganda Language.
42:00 The Feds Are For Child Mutilation.

Oh Look! Another Bank Down

 

 

Remember when Biden admin flunky Janet Yellen said that inflation was "transitory" and nothing to worry about?

Those of us who were saying that she was full of doo doo and that all that COVID spending on top of the disastrous COVID lockdowns was going to come back and bite hard; we were, and continue to be, called conspiracy theorists and the like.

"Federal regulators have seized First Republic Bank and sold it to JPMorgan Chase Bank in a deal aimed at quelling renewed weakness in the nation’s banking industry."

"Renewed weakness"? Try systemic weakness. And it's going to get worse:

"A total of 24 nations are now looking to build a strategic alliance that will challenge the US dollar’s decades-long role as the world’s reserve currency...

The group of known newcomers includes Saudi Arabia, Iran, Argentina, the United Arab Emirates, Algeria, Egypt, Bahrain, Indonesia, two unnamed nations from East Africa and one from West Africa..."

 

When the dollar ceases to be THE currency with which to do international trade, the demand for it goes down which means it loses value both abroad *and at home*. 

"Russian State Duma Deputy Chairman Alexander Babakov says the new form of fiat will likely be backed by other assets including precious metals like gold."

Why? Because the US dollar was based on "trust us". Once Biden and his team decided it would be a good idea to seize assets from Russia (and Russian citizens and associates), it became clear that you couldn't "trust us". So the world saw that it's dollar denominated and US based assets were vulnerable to political whims of whatever admin is in power, they realized that "trust us" fiat currency is dangerous. 

Biden 2024 tho'.  Right?

Garvey's Ghost TV: 4-29-2023: All Kinds of Wrong

Rumble:

BitChute:

topics:
8:00: Mehdi doesn't understand math.
12:00: Judge still believes masks myths in 2023.
22:22: No Sabbath Observance for You.
34:00: Weak Christians for child mutilation.
52:58: Trannies in the London Marathon.

Chicago Loses A COVID Case

 

Well the good part about this is:

An Illinois judge ruled that the city of Chicago must rehire and pay back lost wages of unionized city employees who were fired or disciplined for violating COVID-19 vaccination requirements.

Administrative law judge Anna Hamburg-Gal, writing on behalf of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, said that the city "failed and refused" to bargain in good faith with union leaders "over the effects of its decision to implement a COVID-19 vaccine mandate."

And

Affected employees must also be paid back lost wages and benefits with 7% annual interest, according to the ruling.

The part that I have a problem with is the whole 

" the city "failed and refused" to bargain in good faith with union leaders ""

As I argued when I was put under the gun, Under what contract does a Union have to negotiate and prescribe medical care for its members?  Unions negotiate health benefits not actual health care.

My second problem is the fundamental of people being free to agree to and decline medical interventions without any sort of coercion. In particular the right to refuse EXPERIMENTAL medical treatments of any kind without coercion by any public or private entity.

This is THE fundamental issue and it is clear to me that these judges are not interested in this. I think this is because these judges are enforcing the interests of the state as it grows it's power over people in ways that it should never have. The entire "process violation" rulings are just distractions. The fundamental issue needs to be addressed or this WILL happen again.

CNN and the NewSpeak

As the power of the Tranny lobby grows and the CEI index continues to dictate to various corporations, the newspeak of Orwellian fame continues apace. I have long said and will continue to say that those who oppose the new religion must not use the newspeak or validate it in any way. This example is from CNN (not surprising eh?).

Just looking at the headline we see where CNNs interests lie. An alternate, and much more truthful headline would have been:

Kansas lawmakers override governor's veto to enact pro-woman sports law.

Note that this framing would have put the actual purpose of the law: to protect women in women's sports from men, front and center. Instead CNN shows that in it's world men competing in women's sports, as long as they claim to be a woman, is normal and expected and being against that is The Bad Thing(tm).

So the first lesson here is that whenever you see "anti-trans" you should replace that with "pro-women". In conversation always correct this.

 "Transgender women and girls in Kansas will no longer be allowed to compete on sports teams from kindergarten through college consistent with their gender, after state lawmakers on Wednesday overrode a veto from their governor to enact the restriction."

Again with the newspeak. By identifying males as "transgender women and girls" is again CNN pushing the nonsense. Men have never been allowed to compete in women's sporting events. Using the  New Euphemism(tm) changes nothing. What the law does is make that known fact explicit. Unfortunately such nonsense laws have to be passed because of these militant trannies who will do anything, including murdering children, to get everyone else to affirm their delusion.

Yes, murder children. Know exactly what you're dealing with.

Everyone knows that women's sporting events is not a "gender" in the way CNN is trying to position it. This is the "gender is not sex" argument that the left has successfully used as a wedge to separate people from the fact that 99.9% of the time gender *equals* sex. Everyone knows that women's sports exists precisely because women get trounced when they compete against men and therefore would NEVER win  any sporting competition where men are allowed.

" “It won’t increase any test scores. It won’t help any kids read or write. It won’t help any teachers prepare our kids for the real world. Here’s what this bill would actually do: harm the mental health of our students,” she said."

She can say whatever she wants to. The students who are not trannies are fine mentally. The trannies are sick in the head and they need professional help rather than being allowed to ruin women's sports.

Advocates of such measures have argued that transgender women and girls have physical advantages ​over cisgender women and girls in sports. But a 2017 report in the journal Sports Medicine that reviewed several related studies found “no direct or consistent research” on trans people having an athletic advantage over their cisgender peers, and critics say this legislation adds to the discrimination that trans people face, particularly trans youth.

 The above is an example of why I no longer trust academia and medicine. During COVID we saw that journals actually published junk reports with specific political purposes (ie: kill alternatives to any supposed "vaccine" so that EUAs could be granted). For sport, there is no need for "consistent research". All you need to do is look at the olympic games. Any and all of them. Women  are consistently outperformed by their male teammates. In many cases the slowest male athelete in an event is *faster* than the slowest female in an event. If you need any other proof look below:

Alyson Felix gets completely crushed by a male runner representing Poland. He even starts behind her.

Every time some goofball talks about there is no advantage, you show them this clip. It is a known tactic in this race for slower teams to put a male in with the women in order to see if they can get an advantage.

So any so called "scientific journal" that says that it finds no advantage to males is absolute junk and should be shut down and any references to it in any paper ought to be stricken.

Last week, Kentucky’s legislature overrode its Democratic governor’s veto of a bill that places bans on gender-affirming care for minors, on discussions of sexual orientation or gender identity in school, and on transgender students using bathrooms that align with their gender identity. The move comes after state lawmakers last year overrode another veto by the governor to enact its own anti-trans sports ban.

There is no such thing as "gender-affirming care".  Do not ever use this term. Any time someone uses this term you should say: :" you mean double mastectomies" and castration". And don't say it like your asking a question. It's a fact, state it as such. "gender affirming care" is another euphemism used to lull the public into complacency. It sounds "caring". It sounds "reasonable". It is not. Call it what it is.

I cannot believe I've lived long enough to see liberals go from condemning FGM in Africa and Arabia (that's female genital mutilation which involves the removal of the clitoris and in some cases, sewing the entrance to the vagina shut with only enough space to allow for urination and menstrual flow), to promoting double mastectomies, FGM and MGM for minors.

CNN has let you know where they stand. They are onboard and their use of the newspeak shows it.

The Trump Indictment

Rumble:

Bitchute:

The Public Money Tree

 Over the past few weeks I have been reading about the various schemes in NY and NYC to deal with the purported  MTA budgetary problems.  This in addition to the Federal government bailing out failing banks and other schemes. Up to now I had not really taken the concept of small government as seriously as I perhaps should have. COVID changed a lot of that thinking. Better late than never I suppose.

To summarize, NYC, supposedly following London's lead, wants to implement 'Congestion Pricing" in order to support the MTA. 

Think about that.

The scheme is that in order to go into Manhattan below 59th street (allowing exception for those trying to get to the Queens Bridge for the time being), vehicles would be charged EZ PASS style. This money would supposedly be used to close the budget of the MTA.

Think about that.

I've driven in Manhattan and trust and believe that 99% of people who find themselves below 59th street and not down there to gawk at the skyline and take a pleasure cruise. They are usually trying to conduct some kind of business. At least during the day. Usually when I go to NYC, I will either park in Harlem and take the train downtown OR I will park in lower east side and take the train north. I do whatever I can to avoid driving IN mid Manhattan.

So I pay a huge toll to enter NYC. Pay to use the mass transit when I get there. And now they want to ding me when I exit the FDR if I go to lower Manhattan to park. All so I can conduct business. Let's not even discuss what happens if you DO drive into mid-town. You almost certainly have to pay to park. So you get dinged with a huge toll. Then you get dinged for entering Manhattan below 59th street. Then you get dinged to park. Anyone who has paid for daytime parking in Manhattan knows how much THAT can hurt.

All that and you still have not conducted your business.

In some cases all of these dings can add up to about 100 bucks. You do realize there is a tax on that off street parking right? 

All for the privilege of what? Shopping in Manhattan? Eating in their restaurants. Really?

Anyway, that's not the gripe I have. Really. If you're dumb enough or wealthy enough to not care about that tax on your activity and keep spending money in Manhattan when there are alternatives, you go do that. Personally, I'm willing to bypass Manhattan entirely for Long Island. However; the gripe here is the stated mission: To close MTA budgets.

Why are drivers being asked to foot the bill for a service they may not use while having to pay for the services they DO use? If I don't ride the train, I shouldn't have to pay a fare. People who ride the trains aren't expected to pay my toll. If the MTA and/or government is short on funds then why doesn't it rearrange it's finances, including jettisoning things it has subscribed to (translation: programs) in order to pay for the MTA shortfall since it is so dire?

Why not raise the fare on the trains and busses to what would be sustainable. Perhaps people have gotten to used to artificially low prices for public transport and if they actually had to pay what it costs, like drivers have to when they use their vehicles?

How about the MTA get serious about fare beaters on its trains and busses and stop with this racial justice nonsense and poverty nonsense. I grew up poor and didn't fare beat. Ever.

The reason NYS does this is because it views the population as one big money tree. Why be responsible when we can dig into the pockets of the people. 

Money to house illegal aliens who shouldn't be here? More taxes for you buddy.

MTA can't keep within it's budget? More taxes for you buddy.

Even the 'speed cameras" that are all over the city now are taxes. They claim that they reduce accidents and fatalities. I doubt that. I've seen places where they are located. And many of them, it is impossible to DO the speed limit during the day much less go over it. Of course they have that covered as well.

On one egregious example of "more taxes for you buddy" is a speed camera placed on a 4 lane street that runs parallel to and feeds a highway of similar width. The camera was put near a school but that area is usually unused and not populated by students. I know, I attended that school. The area where students DO congregate? No camera. The coup-de-grace was that they dropped the speed limit on this road in order to drive up the amount of speeding tickets since going the previous limit now put you in fine territory.

I've heard of such nonsense in Staten Island as well.

This isn't just a NY thing. California implemented a "Mansion Tax" and is (or is considering) taxing people who have left the state. The federal government has a pending budget in which Biden wants to make a new "tax on the wealthy" to, you know, "make them pay their fair share". Almost everybody accepts this idea of :paying for their fair share" without even asking why the government deserves any of the money in the first place.

How much money has gone to Ukraine? How much to Israel? Yeah I said it. If we have money to hand out to countries and people in this country who do not belong here, then why do any taxes need to be raised?

Back to NY though. Did you know they recently voted on some new Diversity Department(tm). You know who gets to pay for that right? Question: If you have a debt do you take on new expenses? No? Government doesn't work that way. Why? Because you are the perpetual money tree. Nice roots you have there Shame it you got ringed.