Mass Hysteria: Example Virginia

 A lot of Democrats lost their entire minds when Youngkin won the governor's seat. But the psychosis revealed its extent when the mask mandate was dropped. Let's look at how some of the people have gone completely over the deep end. From the Washington Post:

In Virginia Beach, a mother is sending frantic emails to her school board, begging them to reverse their mask-optional policy to protect the life of her 14-year-old daughter who has a heart condition. 

"Frantic."

Not that I'm not sympathetic to the child's heart condition but that's no reason to impose on everybody else.  We used to understand that.

In Arlington, a teenage girl broke down sobbing this week as she asked her parents for help navigating the suddenly thorny social dynamics between masked and unmasked friends — leading her mother to pull her from school for a mental health day. 

"Broke down sobbing."

There are a lot of people to blame here, but I put that on the parents. Simply put, those who insist on putting something on or in you in order to be your "friend" is a bully and should be cut off. Period. 

in Chesapeake, Va., on Tuesday, the first day her school district stopped requiring masks in accordance with Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s mask-optional executive order, ninth-grade English teacher Amanda Lambert awoke unsure if she would go to work. 

 because of her blood-clotting disorder, she was unlikely to live through “the next round” of coronavirus variants if she contracted the illness and had to go on a ventilator. “Being intubated,” she thought to herself, “is signing your own death certificate.” 

Now I'm slightly sympathetic to this teacher. The shots can cause blot clotting. The infection can cause blood clotting. That's a tough call. Still though, doesn't give her any rights to force other people to put something on or in their bodies.

as teachers reentered classrooms where children were suddenly allowed to appear maskless. 

"Allowed."

This type of language continues to bother me to no end. Like we need permission from some entity to go about our lives without some piece of cloth that has *been known* to have zero effects on transmission of viruses.

"Youngkin’s controversial executive order,..., asserting that parents have the right to decide whether their children wear face coverings in school. "

I am absolutely bothered by the idea that a governor has to (or has the power to) declare whether I have the right to determine what I do or do not do to keep myself or children I may have healthy. As I've said a couple of times in writing and in videos, prior to 2020 I had been operating under the assumptions that there were bright line things that the state, at least in America, would not and could not cross. I was very mistaken.

A Washington Post analysis found that, as of Friday, more than half of Virginia districts had opted to ignore the governor’s order 

Two things: First, I would put down cold hard cash (pre-inflation) that these districts are in "blue" Virginia. Second, I would bet that these people would be calling it "insurrection" if it went the other way. This is why it shouldn't even be something that can be done (in either direction).

" the fallout from a directive that many said felt like a poorly thought-through political ploy with profound health and academic consequences for Virginia’s students and teachers."

'Fallout"? "Poorly thought out"? What is there to think about? If you are so propagandized that you think YOU need to put on a piece of cloth that is known to do diddly squat, KNOCK. YOURSELF. OUT.

Let me tell you a story. Early in my blackjack playing days, I played in casinos that allowed smoking, I hate cigarette smoke. And it's bad for you. So I brought a valved mask to wear. Guess what? Not a damn body said anything to me. I was the only person I saw in this huge casino with a mask on. You know what else? It only worked a little bit and was very uncomfortable. I ended up just dealing with it by staying in the least smokey areas and leaving anytime a person sat down near me with a cigarette.  I was free to choose and I made choices. That's how it goes. There is nothing to "think about".

Lero, who identifies as politically independent, said in an interview that he dislikes masks, which he finds uncomfortable. But he doesn’t mind wearing them in school because he knows some teachers feel unsafe otherwise.

While I'm appreciative that Lero is considering the teacher's feelings, this is bad in the long run. There's being considerate and there is enabling psychosis. Once again, the masks, short of well fitted and *never touched* N95 ones, are useless. Wearing one is symbolic of  The Psychosis and it needs to stop. Lero doesn't understand that his "compliance" only opens the door to more onerous "asks". Of course Lero is already being groomed to be the new "highly compliant" citizen who can be imposed upon with a simple appeal of "feeling safe".

"“im just kindly asking you not to make life anymore chaotic than it already is.”"

Here's how you do that: Stop imposing yourself on other people. 

" Adjusting her own KN95 mask," 

Translation: "After contaminating her expensive mask, which was improperly situated and therefore had already exposed her to any and everything in the air,"

Lambert willed herself to behave normally with the masked and unmasked alike.

If you have to "will yourself to behave normally" when you see or deal with someone who doesn't have a mask on YOU are a victim of The Psychosis and should get yourself deprogrammed.

The most dangerous moment, she said, came when she walked over to a student who was struggling and needed help — and who had pulled down her cloth mask, tucking it below her chin.

"Dangerous"

You know, a lot of these people need professional help.

"“There was that split second of, ‘Oh, I need to tell her to pull up her mask,’ ” Lambert said. “And then I remembered: Oh, wait. I can’t.”"

"I can't."

This, ladies and gentlemen is THE ISSUE. The mask mandate and the vaccine mandate is about control. Like I've written and said many times, these people are punks who are using the state to impose themselves on others. They "can't" make other people do anything because they [rightfully] fear they would be met with a violent response, so they enlist the state, with it's monopoly on violence  to force compliance from people they otherwise couldn't threaten.

This "I can't" is exactly the issue. So now that they do not have the "power" to coerce others, they feel powerless and it *reaaaally* bother's them. That others are not living in The Psychosis bothers them. In fact seeing others not living The Psychosis is a *part of* The Psychosis.

Oh did I mention that this Lambert woman is obese? She couldn't be bothered with changing her dietary habits and exercise habits which is going to cause her health issues anyway but wants to impose herself on others.

Apart from that — and the ever-present worry that she might catch the virus 

"Ever present worry" of catching COVID. If she was THAT worried she'd be in the gym. She had two years to get herself in shape and failed to do so. Do you know what kind of fitness gains can be had in 2 years? But aside from that there is a difference between accepting that everyone gets their turn eventually and worrying about catching the virus. I have been operating under the assumption that I can or will catch the virus at any time. Hence I have a regimen to slow the replication process so that I don't get pulled into stage II of the disease where the body's immune system goes into overdrive and THAT process kills. 

So in a sense this woman is a *victim* of Fauci et. al. who have suppressed early treatment in favor of the WEF agenda. 

"Loudoun saw about 100 students show up maskless over the course of the week, said spokesman Wayde Byard, and those students were placed apart from masked peers in common areas such as auditoriums, gyms or libraries. No students were punished, Byard said." 

The school district that allows sexual assault...

Anyway, these students WERE in fact punished AND discriminated against.

"Public Schools spokeswoman Helen Lloyd said only 26 of the system’s 180,000 students refused to put masks on, earning them one-day suspensions. " 

Not surprised. The next generation is being groomed to accept authoritarianism as normal.

"In Chesapeake, mother Kasha Herek switched her child to home schooling this week after the end of required masking led the 9-year-old to fear going to school...

said she has kept her son home this week after the boy started crying and asked if he was going to die at school. "

Reminder that children are at the lowest risk of both severe disease as well as death. As a matter of fact, when looking at the ages mentioned here, most charts have their hospitalization and deaths at zero because there are so few (I have posted many such charts here). If your 9 year old kid thinks he is going to die because someone is not wearing a mask at school, there is failure all around BEGINNING at home.

“All that he’s done is divide our state and made this a political thing " 

No he did no such thing. These people were all happy as a pig in slop when they could force masks on people. Now they lost that power and its 'division" 

You can **** off this that nonsense. You all suffering The Psychosis have made it political. You COULD have minded your own business and chosen to do what made YOU comfortable, but instead you all wanted to impose on other people. THAT is what made it political.

"Then she found herself seated near four unmasked students, which made her “extremely nervous,” " 

This sounds like some school desegregation shit. Again, children are the least vulnerable population. No child should be "nervous" unless they are obese and/or diabetic.

" She said people, all the way up to Youngkin, are prioritizing what they perceive as personal rights over other people’s health and safety.“Listen to ourselves. Do we not care about each other?” said Kerr-Hobert, 42, who has two children in the school system. “It bothers me to the core what our country is becoming."" 

Yeah so in America, the constitutional republic that it is, the INDIVIDUAL has rights. Not the group. There is no "other people's health and safety" exception to those individually held rights. This underscores another rather large problem that the last two years has exposed: The total lack of understanding on how American governance is supposed to work per the Constitution and law arising out of it.  The reason this chick is bothered "to the core" about what the "country is becoming" is because she lacks understanding of WHAT the country "IS".  I agree that there is a problem with "what the country is becoming". It is becoming a socialist state and far too many people are OK with that because they think they benefit from that change and will only learn too late what they actually have signed up for.

"“My daughter broke down crying, saying, ‘I can’t make these decisions. They’re too hard,’ ” Webb said. “This order is ending friendships. It’s just so divisive.”"

The order is not ending friendships. You (and your friends) lack of respect for the rights of others is ending friendships. But look at the language here "I can't make these decisions". When you think you can't make decisions then you want the government to step in and make decisions for you. That is giving up responsibility for your decisions. That's a part of The Psychosis. If these people understood the following well known facts:

1) Masks, with the exception of N95 or better masks, that are properly fitted and sealed and uncontaminated by frequent removal, are absolutely useless when it comes to blocking the virus. Period.

2) The current "vaccines" are nothing of the sort and do not prevent transmission or infection of said virus.

3) none of the current vaccines are effective against the current strain (Omicron).

4) Everybody will have their turn.

5) Early treatment is key.

Then there would be no need to have a friendship threatened. It is the ignorance of these facts that is leading people to kill friendships. 

So this article is a great example of The Psychosis. The Post is going after Youngkin because he just won and he is a Republican and they are mad about it. In plain contrast is NY Gov Hochul who nobody has anything to say in regards to her mandate because it's what the purveyors of The Psychosis want to see done.

Garvey's Ghost TV 1-26-2022: What Should Be Done

 

Garvey's Ghost TV: 1-22-2022: Spanning The Globe

 

More Exemptions Fall

Last October I posted about people who got exemptions who thought they were home free. I warned that those exemptions were at risk because the very presence of so called non-vaccinated persons puts a lie to the deadly emergency message. Well here's New Jersey.

 

 Irked eh?

"The Healthcare Professionals and Allied Employees (HPAE), the state’s largest union of nurses and health care workers, released a statement today expressing frustration at Gov. Phil Murphy’s new booster mandate for health care and congregate living workers, which also eliminates the test-out option for those who do not wish to get vaccinated.

“Testing is a key component and today’s executive order has just eliminated an important tool in slowing the spread of the virus,” HPAE President Debbie White said. “While we appreciate the need to increase vaccination rates, this does not solve the problems that exist right now.”"

Say, who did this union support during the last election?

HPAE endorsed Murphy in both 2017 and 2021, with White saying last year that Murphy “consistently brought labor to the table in times of crisis to work collaboratively.”

 Oh, so like "my" union, they supported the mandate imposing candidate and got their members screwed.

There's a story about feeding alligators that is appropriate now.

Once the Supreme Court allowed the CMS mandate to go through and stated that the states essentially have free hand to impose what they like, gov. Murphy had a free hand. You all [helped] in giving him that power by supporting him even though it was well known that he was Mr. Mandate. These nurses just thought that the alligator wouldn't eat them.

Garvey's Ghost TV 1-19-2022: The New Nazis

 Live Stream 8PM EST

Looking at the recent Rasmussen report and a prior Pew poll.

The Djokovic Affair: Not About Health Or Safety

 If you thought that the Djkovic issue was just Australia then you are extremely naive about what is going on here. No sooner had Australia deported  Djokovic, other sporting "authorities" stepped up to show their allegence to the WEF NWO.

The French authorities said this week that players must be vaccinated to compete in the French Open — the next of the four Grand Slam tournaments, scheduled for May.

And:

The authorities in Spain, where Mr. Djokovic owns a house, have urged him to “lead by example” and get vaccinated. In Monte Carlo, where Mr. Djokovic also has a house, the organizers of a tournament that he has previously won said they were awaiting guidelines from the French government for the 2022 edition in April.

And :

Mr. Djokovic might be able to compete in Wimbledon in June, but under current guidelines he could be barred from competing in the U.S. Open a few months later, since foreign travelers must be vaccinated to enter the United States, with very limited exceptions.

Let me remind you that it is already known that these "vaccinations" do nothing to stop infection or transmission of COVID. Again, this is widely known and not in dispute. Hence, everybody and anybody attending any event is just as likely to get infected and/or transmit regardless of whether they took a shot. Therefore; it is clear that this is NOT about health. This is not about safety. This is a compliance test and a lot of people are more than willing to comply.

"“Who would understand if we asked our citizens to make an effort and respect the rules if we authorize some to get out of them?” Stanislas Guerini, the leader of President Emmanuel Macron’s party, said on French radio this week. He called Mr. Djokovic’s behavior in remaining unvaccinated “irresponsible.”"

There it is. First you didn't ASK, You made a demand on the citizenry. Those who willingly took a shot did so of their own free will. But the state has and continues to coerce those who made other choices. That is not an ask.  

Secondly here is the "responsible" talk that I discussed in the last Garvey's Ghost TV episode. This claim that so and so is being responsible is to obfuscate the real message that those people are being compliant with demands that the state put upon them.  Unfortunately too many people see "compliance" as automatically good.

This goes along with what the Australian authorities said about deporting Djokovic. He was a threat to the order because his being "unvaccinated" would lead people to question the authorities and undermine their message. Again, this is not about health. It is about control.

Djokovic is rich. He can retire and do whatever he wants. They know this. This is about making him an example to those who are not similarly situated. Here's what I think Djokovic and Serbia should do:

They should create a "parallel sports circuit" and create a tennis open for all athletes free of discrimination. This is in line with all the talk of parallel economies being discussed. The current regimes must be broken and they can only be broken by being able to bypass them entirely. 

On a side note, I'm a big fan of cycling. I watch Le Tour every year. Many of those cyclist are dead smack in the middle of the age group most likely to get myocarditis from the vaccines. How many of them are going to risk their lives in order to participate? Will we see a cyclist drop dead during Le Tour as we have seen on soccer fields? 

Sotomayor Should Be Recused

 SCOTUS judge Sonia Sotomayor should be recused from any case that has to do with COVID and perhaps any other health related litigation for the remainder of her term. Why? Because of this revelation via NPR

"It was pretty jarring earlier this month when the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court took the bench for the first time since the omicron surge over the holidays. All were now wearing masks. All, that is, except Justice Neil Gorsuch. What's more, Justice Sonia Sotomayor was not there at all, choosing instead to participate through a microphone setup in her chambers."

Why, pray tell was she holed up in her chambers?

Sotomayor has diabetes, a condition that puts her at high risk for serious illness, or even death, from COVID-19...

 Now, though, the situation had changed with the omicron surge, and according to court sources, Sotomayor did not feel safe in close proximity to people who were unmasked. Chief Justice John Roberts, understanding that, in some form asked the other justices to mask up.

I see.

Is she vaccinated? Does she not "believe the science" that masks work? I mean you can't say that masks don't work on YouTube (as me how I know) because it contradicts "authoritative sources". If she believes in the science so much she should be fine. 

They all did. Except Gorsuch, who, as it happens, sits next to Sotomayor on the bench. His continued refusal since then has also meant that Sotomayor has not attended the justices' weekly conference in person, joining instead by telephone.

The press made a point of pointing out that all the justices were triple jabbed. So how is it that Sotomayor felt "unsafe". Did she not believe the shots worked? Did she not believe that the shots plus the masks work?

If she felt "unsafe" around her triple jabbed colleagues then what business did she had supporting a mandate for a product she herself does not have faith in?

How is that not a disqualifying conflict?

Any Comments From LeBron?

 Not sure how long this stays up:

The New Segregationists

 For those very long readers they probably noticed I have ceased from "noting" MLK day. One of the if not THE reason for it is because I had come to the conclusion that MLK day and the man himself had become commercialized.  In particular I saw how people on the left would take positions that were diametrically opposed to the stated goals of King.

Judge by content of character? Nope. Blacks are all oppressed. Whites are universal oppressors.

Personal accountability? Nope. Every ill that a black person faces or black people face is the fault of white people (via WS) and black people are not responsible for their own behavior and choices.

But 2021 revealed the whopper. The same people who supposedly love MLK are OK with segregation. It is not any state or city in the south (that I know of) that is run by so called racist Republicans who have made mandates that segregate people due to medical choices they made for themselves.

As I noted in a post on why I think Juneteenth is a great holiday for all Americans, I noted that the end of slavery was a high point because it affirmed the right of all persons to have ownership over their own body (and it's fruits). You are not the property of the state nor of any individual.  That was a great thing to have happened in America. A LOT of people died making that so.

And yet here is the stark comparison. In NYC in one of the most liberal states (upstate is red though) and the *black* mayor, a Democrat failed to end the "vaccine mandate" on businesses and failed to end the segregation in certain public areas. Note that these policies are only in heavily liberal NYC. You cross the lines into Nassau or Westchester counties and none of that nonsense is in effect.

NYC is the new Birmingham and Adams is the Bull Connor. 

And standing in stark contrast, down in Virginia, the prior capitol of the Confederacy, the new Republican governor, ended the vaccine mandates for the state as one of his first actions on day one.

Day. One.

Oh and a black Jamaican immigrant is lieutenant governor.

My how times have changed.

Now to be clear, it isn't that discrimination and segregation did not exist in northern states and cities. But the loudest mouths about the sins of segregation and discrimination come from those places and yet they have managed to be THE places of discrimination and segregation.

Who would have figured that all you needed to turn the left black leadership class into segregationists was to create fear of a virus with a 99.9% survival rate.

Garvey's Ghost TV: Reviewing The SCOTUS Decision

 Also COVID data out of the UK.

The Custodial State

 A Taki's Magazine article entitled "Prisoners of the New Order" popped into my reading feed last night that I thought really encapsulated what we are seeing in the US since March of 2020.  I think it is worth a read.

The West is now in the midst of a great transformation. The old liberal order of respect for the individual rights of the citizens as things they possess by nature of being alive is now giving way to a custodial order. In the old order, you were responsible for you. In the new managerial order, the administrative state is responsible for you.

 

This is why we hear so much about "public health" and "public" this that and the other. Looking at how people talk, particularly on the left, they want the state to enforce their own particular view of how things should be done. They cannot aggress against individuals themselves so they take over state institutions to do the aggression for them. Of course the state enforcers (police) are more than happy to "do their job".

I don't bring up the police by accident. The article goes on to show what this custodial state actually is:

Prisons, of course, work similarly. Those who follow the rules are rewarded with extra benefits like additional commissary or access to the library. Those who are noncompliant are punished. As we are seeing with the administrative state’s response to Covid, the system rests on the utilitarian belief that people are motivated by the desire for pleasure and the avoidance of pain.

Another similarity is the prison system selects against empathy. Guards and administrators who care about the prisoners are a problem. Similarly, bureaucracy selects against conscientiousness. Put the two together in the prison system and the result is a lot of sadists who take pleasure in tormenting the prisoners. It turns out that people who like exercising absolute control over others tend to be sociopaths. (my underlines)

This is exactly what's going on in America (and more so elsewhere). The country is becoming an open air prison.  And the point about sadists is spot on. I have shown in the Garvey's Ghost TV series how all these sadists behave. These abusers who are relishing the power they now have to act out on their depravity are enjoying this and no amount of showing truth and data will dissuade them because it is not about health or safety it is about power over others.

An Admission?

 Previously we discussed Eco Health Alliance and their work in China on viruses. We also showed the tweets of Peter Dazak on the subject (2). Now we have a video from 2016.

In March of 2016, Dr. Peter Daszak explained the practice of inserting spike protein into the sequence of bat-borne coronaviruses, experimenting with the process until it bound to human cells, thus progressing towards the creation of a pathogenic virus in humans. pic.twitter.com/HbiH06F0q5

— The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) January 13, 2022

Garveys Ghost TV 1-12-2022: Damn The Torpedoes. Full Speed Ahead!

 Live 8PM EST:

Tyrants level up. Comorbidities, Myocarditis and Pericarditis, Autoimmune diseases. Can we cover all in an hour?

"At Least Four" You Say?

 Here at The Ghost we said that this entire pandemic was a pandemic of the co-morbid. That is that the people at risk for severe outcomes, including death were those who had certain co-morbidities. Top of that list was and is, obesity. Other comorbidities are closely related to obesity such as diabetes and kidney disease.

"Fact checkers" and other so called "authorities" would have anyone stating this labelled "anti-vaxxer" and "conspiracy theorists". All we were doing was looking at the data from around the world. Data that was readily available to anyone who could bother to look. Now almost 2 years later, here comes the head of the CDC saying what we, the skeptics, knew all along.

CDC director says over 75% of covid deaths were people with “at least four comorbidities” and were “unwell to begin with”
pic.twitter.com/Oq6Oh2qk90

— Lucas Tomlinson (@LucasFoxNews) January 10, 2022

 

We knew this. This is why vaccine mandates and passports are not only immoral but are totally ineffective.  These people need to be held accountable. There needs to be reparations to those of us who have suffered, literally, for not only speaking the truth but for standing up for it at [great] expense.

Garvey's Ghost TV: These Are Not Reasonable People

 

SCOTUS 2022: Stakes Is High

 

 

I wish I was referring to the track above but I'm not. Yesterday's SCOTUS oral arguments was painful to listen to. We had court justices that made statements of "fact" that were not only not facts at all, such as "750 million new cases" (said by Bryer) which is impossible as there are only 330 million people in the US IN TOTAL, but that weren't even a part of the facts put into evidence by either party. 

You had Sotomayor who made the absolute ludicrous claim that there were 100,000 children in ICU for COVID when there are barely 1% lf that claim in hospital with OR from COVID.

The thought that there are people on the highest court of the land which supposedly would have the highest standards in the land who don't have the latest information on COVID and who couldn't even bother to do a simple Google search on the subject is downright depressing. 

These are supposed to be some of the best legal minds from the top Ivy League institutions?

Really?

That matter aside I want to underscore the level of stakes here. It is something I have mentioned here many times and that I have consistently noted as absent from the various legal briefs I have read:

Does the individual have a inalienable right to decide, without consequences other than his own health, what medication he will or will not take or what medical procedures he will or will not undergo?

Does his body belong to him or does it belong to the state or some private employer?

Because you cannot simultaneously own your body and also be subject to the medical whims of the state or a private entity.

All of the arguments I've read and heard have been technical in nature. Does so and so agency have this right. Did they go through this process? Did Congress delegate this that or the other. Does the "emergency" authorize, such and such. If such and such exemption is listed then... 

Etc. Etc. Etc.

The facts alone in the case sink this and every other mandate. As the latest variant has blown through the "vaxxed" population and broken every previous case record world wide has shown. The mandate's stated purpose: to stop or slow the spread, is DOA. 

They cannot support such a case with the evidence on hand. That alone should sink this and every other mandate. If they don't then that means any agency or private party can make any mandate they like regardless of whether it actually serves a purpose. 

That the so-called vaccines reduce symptoms should be another nail in it's coffin. No one would take a NyQuil mandate seriously. Imagine that your boss or the state mandated that you take NyQuil because you might be sick and that by taking NyQuil you will have less symptoms and therefore are less likely to miss work.

Exactly.

But the evidence shows that this is exactlly what these mandates are. State and private companies playing doctor (without a license) on what you should take if you fall ill.

Again though, that is all "technicalities". The main point is do you have the right to refuse without retaliation? That answer should be an easy yes but I'm not convinced these justices understand that.  Not even the "conservative" ones.

The other reason this should be an easy decision is that these vaccines are clearly experimental. If you got the childhood vaccines there was (and is) a schedule. You get one set, then another set and there is a set time between them and a set dose and then you're done. When it comes to the COVID "vaccines" they first said "1 (J&J) or 2 and done". They even briefly claimed that once taken the individual could not get infected OR transmit. Shortly thereafter, they changed their tune on that.

Then they went onto Boosters with some countries on booster number 4 and others planning out to booster number 6.  Nobody in these health agencies have any idea what is going on or what to expect. On that basis alone we know that this entire "vaccination" push is at best experimental.

Again, do you as an individual have the inalienable right to decline to be experimented on? That should be an easy "Yes" and yet I am not confident in the least bit that these judges even see this. There shouldn't be a liberal or conservative view on this. This should be fundamentally understood. But since it is clear that even easily accessible and fundamental facts such as it being impossible to have 750 million new cases in the US, is lost on these judges we cannot be confident that the court will decide *in the manner* they need to,

The other catch here is that from what I've heard and read, even if the court strikes down the federal mandates, which is again a "technical" matter, they are still in favor of and apparently accepting the argument that the states have such power. Hence, it may be the case that an adverse ruling for the fed simply means that the people affected have merely jumped out of the fire and INTO the frying pan.

This would particularly be the case in "blue" states that are the most authoritarian but it does leave "red' states vulnerable at every election cycle. So for example, DeSantis may be hostile to mandates in Florida, but all it would take is a single Democrat governorship victory and that "safe haven" is gone.

So yes the stakes are very high here. A failure to state clearly the individual's right to decline medical treatment without threats against their person and livelihoods will leave the door open to states and private parties regardless of whether these particular federal mandates are upheld.

Garveys Ghost TV 1--5-2022: WHyyyyuh?

 Live at 8PM EST

Free State and Slave State

 In two pictures:

Florida governor Ron DeSantis holding a press conference

NY Governor Hochul holding a press conference:

Now I will bet that all the people in both pictures have had at least 2 COVID shots. If you knew nothing about the shots but "believed in vaccines" then, which group of people would you think actually "believed in vaccines"?

These two pictures demonstrate the very serious divide in the country between those who virtue signal and abuse power and those.who do not. Those that live *intelligently* without fear and those who use fear as a weapon.

Everything I Said Since April 2020

Our new ad campaign, to help prevent #COVID19 deaths and hospitalizations. pic.twitter.com/QIS5B02hnP

— Nayib Bukele 🇸🇻 (@nayibbukele) January 4, 2022

Everything I said since April of 2020. Exercise. Get sun exposure. Eat correctly.

The government of El Salvador gets it. The narrative is collapsing but the massive damage has been done.

Meanwhile in France:

Garvey's Ghost TV: 1-3-2022: New Year, Old Science

 Live at 8PM EST: