He Used To Be Trans

As "World War T" heats up:

A great lesson here about enabling behavior.

Is AG Barr What Sessions Was Expected to Be?

It seems that AG Barr is perhaps what we thought Sessions was supposed to be. Currently the DC types are stuck on the Mueller report. While Mueller was allowed to drag out his investigation under Sessions, Bar let Mueller know that he had to put up or shut up. Barr saw the investigation for what it was and wasn't going to let that continue under his watch. But this is not what really separates him from Sessions. The recent action in Mass, is:

BOSTON – Federal prosecutors charged a Massachusetts judge with obstruction of justice and perjury on Thursday, saying she prevented immigration agents from arresting an undocumented immigrant after a state court hearing by allowing him to leave the courthouse through a back door.

I'm not entirely clear why the action taken by a judge in Cal. wasn't pursued but it is welcome that an example is being made of.

Prosecutors alleged that during an April 2018 court hearing in Newtown, Mass., Joseph and MacGregor allowed the Dominican national, detained on drug and outstanding warrant charges, to leave the courthouse from a downstairs back door after the judge instructed an immigration agent to wait in the hallway outside her courtroom...

n court documents, federal prosecutors offered up a partial transcript of the court proceeding in which the judge, defense attorney and court clerk refer to the migrant's status and the risk that he would be detained by immigration officials following the hearing.

"ICE is gonna get him?" Joseph asks the migrant's defense attorney.

"Yeah," the attorney responds.

Soon after the exchange, prosecutors allege, Joseph directed the courtroom recorder to be "turned off" for 52 seconds while the discussion continued.

The defense attorney later asked that Medina-Perez be allowed to retrieve his property from a downstairs lockup.

Reminded that the ICE agent was waiting outside the courtroom, the judge allegedly said: "That's fine. I'm not gonna allow them to come in here. But (the migrant) has been released on this."

When he was escorted downstairs, prosecutors asserted that MacGregor used his security access card to release Medina-Perez "out the back door."

I believe this to be a shot across the bow for other jurisdictions. While Sessions asked if/how the judge in Oakland could be prosecuted, Barr has taken action.

Expect to not hear much about this case unless the judge gets off. Even then. Here's the other thing: I've long thought that any family of citizens killed by illegal aliens who are walking free in the US due to local government action, should be able to sue said governments and the specific individuals for wrongful death. If the prosecution of this judge succeeds I think that such families will be able to pursue these claims since they will be able to show that the actions of the government agents are criminal.

Mayor Pete Has a Problem With His Bible

One of the things I have "enjoyed" since the election of Trump and the reaction from "The Left" is how so much hypocrisy and treason has been laid bare to the public. Among these things is how Christians are starting to see what is in store for them once the Democrats (with the assist of some Republicans, to be fair) get ahold of the courts and other levers of power. Which brings us to Pete Buttigieg.

Mayor Pete has been picking on Vice President Pence, saying:

"Yes, Mr. Vice President ... it has moved me closer to God. ... That's the thing I wish the Mike Pences of the world would understand: That if you have a problem with who I am, your quarrel is not with me. ...Your quarrel, sir, is with my creator."

In other words Pete asserts that God made him the way he is and since we [must] approve of that which God as made, we must accept his homosexuality and his homosexual behavior, including his "marriage". His is a very wrong understanding of scripture. It's hard to blame him on this because there are so many so-called Christian denominations that are teaching [and allowing] things that are not Christian.

Now it would be easy to understand if Pete declared himself not a Christian. Then he could assert whatever he wanted. However; when he blatantly misrepresents the faith it should not go uncorrected. So here it is.

First for Mayor Pete is Genesis:

26And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

28And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

So here we have established that God made [hu]mans as male and female pairs and meant for them "to be fruitful" (have sex) and multiply (make babies).

Since two males and two females cannot "multiply" that kind of coupling was not the purpose of creation.

In case that wasn't clear, Genesis 2 goes into details:

18And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

So man was originally "alone".

19And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.

20And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.gave: Heb. called

So out of everything out there none was satisfactory.

22And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. 23And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

24Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. 25And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

Two points here. I think the science conflicts with the "woman from man" thing, but that's not the point here. Point being that if you are a Bible believing Christian, the above is what you hold to. The important points being:

Eve was female.
Eve was the wife [help meet] of Adam
God declares that a man leaves his mother and father (at which point there was no mother and father for Adam to leave) and "cleave" (meaning join) to his wife.
So if it wasn't clear from Gen 1 that it's man and woman. Then Gen 2 further underlines the point. Since Mayor Pete is supposed to be highly intelligent, with his Harvard degrees and language skills, he ought to know this.

Which brings us to God's creation. Genesis 3 discusses the fall of man. Eve eats the forbidden fruit of knowledge (why didn't she get at that tree of life?) Adam eats because Eve gave him a piece to eat. They "discover" they are naked (among other things) and [hu]mankind starts the slow decline in life expectancy as the "original sin" takes it's toll.

Again this runs counter to what we know from science where human life expectancy has gone UP since we've arrived rather than down but again this is about what a Christian claims to believe. If you are a Bible believing Christian, Genesis is what Genesis is. And homosexuality comes after the fall of man and is *NOT* the creation of God but a consequence of sin . In this case the original sin was *rebellion* against God's instructions.

Ahem.

But in case it still wasn't clear as to what was intended as human coupling we find Exodus:

12Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

Not "your parents". Not your "fathers". Not your "mothers". Thy father and thy mother.

17Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife,

Neighbor's wife. One of the reasons why "husband" is not mentioned is because a wife was something bought. Just keeping it real. What do you think "Bride price" means? I'm not suggesting chattel but wives, or better said, their parents don't pay for husbands.

Lastly from Exodus:

3If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him.

4If his master have given him a wife, and she have born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself.

This is a discussion of servants, AKA slaves. But notice "he were married, then his wife..." Didn't say his "spouse", "partner", husband" or any of the other things. A man has a wife. Period. Wife is female. Period.

There are those who like to do the whole "New Testament supersedes the Old Testament" thing. Well not on this point it doesn't. Mathew 19:

The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

4And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

So this is supposed to be Jesus speaking. A man...shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh. Nope, no husband here. Wife = female. Period.

Mark 10

5And Jesus answered and said unto them, For the hardness of your heart he wrote you this precept.

6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.

7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife;

8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.

So it is evidently clear as to what the Biblical scriptures have to say on the subject of marriage and sex. So Mayor Pete is deceiving the public when he makes his statements that God created him the way he is and thus condones his behavior. This brings us to what knowledgable Christians should be aware of:

2 Timothy:

1This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

2For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

3Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,

4Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

5Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

6For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,

7Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

As Pence said: Pete knows better. So did the serpent in the garden.

They're Rapists...Murderers....

A bedrock principle of U.S. and international law known as nonrefoulement prohibits the United States from returning individuals to countries where they are more likely than not to face persecution, torture, or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.

-ACLU (sic)

They fled their homes in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to escape extreme violence, including rape and death threats.

-ACLU (sic)

Yet Defendants returned the Individual Plaintiffs to Mexico where they had already experienced physical and verbal assaults, are living in fear of future violence, and are struggling to survive.

-ACLU (sic)

The individual plaintiffs present uncontested evidence that they fled their homes in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to escape extreme violence, including rape and death threats. One plaintiff alleges she was forced to flee Honduras after her life was threatened for being a lesbian. Another contends he suffered beatings and death threats by a “death squad” in Guatemala that targeted him for his indigenous identity. Plaintiffs contend they have continued to experience physical and verbal assaults, and live in fear of future violence, in Mexico.

-"Judge" (sic) SeeBorg

When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people. But I speak to border guards and they tell us what we're getting. And it only makes common sense. It only makes common sense. They're sending us not the right people. It's coming from more than Mexico. It's coming from all over South and Latin America,

-Trump Only one of these comments is "racist". Guess which one.

Science knowledge varies by race and ethnicity in U.S

By Pew Research

Given the recent rehash of the issue of blacks being given earning only 7 seats at Stuyvesant HS, I figured this would be a good piece to add to the [largely unneccessary] discussion.

I would like to bring the reader's attention to the lower third of the chart starting with "The main components in Antacids are bases". These kinds of questions reflect the kind of knowledge required to do STEM work. If Blacks make up 13% of the population and only 1/3 (Just grabbing one of the question about hypothesis about a computer slowing down) of that group has basic science understanding, then only 4.3% of the population has enough basic science understanding to even start in a STEM field. Since the average was 9% then you're talking about 1.17% of the population with what Pew refers to as "high on science knowledge scale". So hypothetically, out of 37 million black people in America only 432,900 would score "high on science knowledge scale". That's less than a million.

Another note:

Whites with less than a college degree did better than black college grads.

So does it surprise anyone that only 7 black kids earned a seat at a HS that requires a high grade on standardized tests? Is it surprising there are so few black people at the upper reaches of STEM? It can only come to as a surprise to those unfamiliar with the data.

Examining the NZ Shooter Manifesto

You can find the complete transcript here:

http://web.archive.org/web/20190315085158/https:/www.documentcloud.org/documents/5770516-The-Great-Replacement-New-Zealand-Shooter.html

First: A big fuck you to the NZ government and the companies cooperating with them to censor the manifesto. It is 100% intolerable for any government to tell citizens what they can and cannot read. If you are an adult you should be able to read whatever you like. Reading does not equal endorsement of what is read. That some people may read the material and decide to do something criminal is part and parcel of living in a free society. And now onto the show. The shooter opens with a poem that I first became familiar with when I watched Interstellar. I'm going to guess the shooter also learned of it there. I suppose we should be banning Interstellar, right?

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

He quotes the entire poem (I believe). It's actually quite good.

If there is one thing I want you to remember from these writings, its that the birthrates must change. Even if we were to deport all Non-Europeans from our lands tomorrow, the European people would still be spiraling into decay and eventual death.

This is actually something The Ghost has pointed out for years. While many white people of a certain bent go on and on about white genocide, the truth of the matter is that white people are simply not breeding. Now there are indeed arguments for how a declining population can be beneficial to the environment, which the author does discuss. If one's society runs on a system that requires a stable, if not increasing population in order to stay afloat, then declining births is a mortal danger. The author goes at length about this issue and how mass immigration accelerates the demographic replacement of whites/Europeans in their own homelands. As a Garveyite who believes in Africa for the African, I cannot oppose a man who desires Europe for Europeans. It's only fair. What's yours is yours and what's mine is mine. What we agree to trade is fair.

1. In general Who are you?

Just a ordinary White man,28 years old. Born in Australia to a working class,low income family.

I'm not entirely surprised by this demographic. Under the current social environment such a man is at the bottom of the social heap. While SJWs claim to be "fighting the patriarchy" and "sticking it to the man", they are actually actively disenfranching the average and poor white male. They *think* that all white men have privilege and whatnot, but fail to understand that the elites who are running shit are rich and disproportionately NOT WHITE and generally unaffected by the shenanigans of ANTIFA, BLM, etc.

To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result.

And of course the "political enemies" did just that. Gun bans? Check. Censorship? Check.

Was there a particular event or reason you decided to commit to a violent attack?

Honestly the answer he gave for this was surprising to me. I think it bodes ill for the future and is probably why the censorship hammer was dropped (and the event dropped from the news).

Ebba was walking to meet her mother after school, when she was murdered by an Islamic attacker, driving a stolen vehicle through the shopping promenade on which she was walking. Ebba was partially deaf, unable to hear the attacker coming. Ebba death at the hands of the invaders, the indignity of her violent demise and my inability to stop it broke through my own jaded cynicism like a sledgehammer.

I consider this The Catalyst. Perhaps a better term would be event horizon. The one killing that makes one go "woah, wait."

The second event was the 2017 French General election. The candidates were an obvious sign of our times: a globalist, capitalist, egalitarian, an ex-investment banker was no national beliefs other than the pursuit of profit versus a milquetoast,feckless, civic nationalist, an uncontroversial figure who’s most brave and inspired idea resolved to the possible deportation of illegal immigrants. Despite this ridiculous match up, the possibility of a victory by the quasi- nationalist was at least, to myself, a sign that maybe a political solution was still possible.The internationalist, globalist, anti-white, ex-banker won. It wasn’t even close. The truth of the political situation in Europe was suddenly impossible to accept.My despair set in.My belief in a democratic solution vanished.

I had almost named this post The Ballot Or The Bullet New Zealand because I instantly understood what was at stake here. Do not take the above paragraph lightly. Once people come to think that they cannot resolve their differences peacefully and at the ballot box, then there is only violence left. The American Left is treading very hard on this thin ice with their Trump derangement.

Simple, white, wooden crosses stretching from the fields beside the roadway, seemingly without end, into the horizon. Their number uncountable, the representation of their loss unfathomable. I pulled my rental car over, and sat, staring at these crosses and contemplating how it was that despite these men and womens sacrifice, despite their bravery, we had still fallen so far.I broke into tears, sobbing alone in the car, staring at the crosses, at the forgotten dead. Why were we allowing these soldiers deaths to be in vain? Why were we allowing the invaders to conquer us? Overcome us? Without a single shot fired in response?

I had a similar thought when I watched the following movies:

Fury
Hacksaw Ridge
Dunkirk

After seeing what those soldiers went through and what they were fighting for. I too had to ask what the entire FUCK is wrong with Europeans? Look, I'm glad they got out of Africa. I'm glad they stopped with the Jim Crow and other forms of discrimination. But the wholesale destruction of their own soctieties so that they cannot be called "racist" is the most self-destructive thing they've embarked upon. And the thing is that most black folk have not taken heed of Fanon's warning about the "false middle class" that aims to take over.

Did the groups you support/are aligned with order or promote your attack?

No.No group ordered my attack, I make the decision myself. Though I did contact the reborn Knights Templar for a blessing in support of the attack, which was given

I suppose this Knights Templar group is in hiding now.

Do these groups hold power/who are the people in these groups? The total number of people in these organizations is in the millions, the total number of groups in the thousands. People from every walk of life, in every place of employment and field but disproportionately employed in military services and law enforcement. Unsurprisingly ethno- nationalists and nationalists seek employment in areas that serve their nations and community. I would estimate the number of soldiers in European armed forces that also belong to nationalist groups to number in the hundreds of thousands, with just as many employed in law enforcement positions.

I believe him and you should too.

Why did you choose to use firearms? I could have chosen any weapons or means.A TATP filled rental van. Household flour, a method of dispersion and an ignition source.A ballpeen hammer and a wooden shield.Gas,fire,vehicular attacks,plane attacks, any means were available. I had the will and I had the resources. I chose firearms for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of United states and thereby the political situation of the world. The US is torn into many factions by its second amendment, along state, social, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. With enough pressure the left wing within the United states will seek to abolish the second amendment, and the right wing within the US will see this as an attack on their very freedom and liberty. This attempted abolishment of rights by the left will result in a dramatic polarization of the people in the United States and eventually a fracturing of the US along cultural and racial lines.

He's an accelerationist. "Heighten the contradiction". I wonder if he knows that repeal of the 2nd requires a 2/3 approval of the states. That's not happening...anytime soon. What will happen is that an increased number of unconstitutional laws will be passed and upheld by courts long politicized that proscribe the rights of the citizens to bear arms. In the name of public safety of course.

Was there any reason you attacked that(those) mosque(s) in particular? Originally the mosque in Dunedin was the main target,particularly after watching the video on their facebook page named “Otago muslim association” https://www.facebook.com/Otago-Muslim-Association- 206778229358786/ The video war entitled “ Very interesting video. Only for Muslims. Please do not redistribute ” that proved their knowledge of their actions, and their guilt. https://www.facebook.com/206778229358786/videos/451628238207116/ But after visiting the mosques in Christchurch and Linwood and seeing the desecration of the church that had been converted to a mosque in Ashburton, my plans changed

I do not have a FB account and cannot reach the video. If anyone has a copy of the video in question, please forward. Since I cannot view the video I cannot comment on whether/how inflamatory it was or what may have gotten the shooters specific attention.

Did/do you personally hate muslims? A muslim man or woman living in their homelands?No. A muslim man or woman choosing to invade our lands live on our soil and replace our people? Yes, I dislike them. The only muslim I truly hate is the convert, those from our own people that turn their backs on their heritage, turn their backs on their cultures, turn their back on their traditions and became blood traitors to their own race. These I hate.

This "I like them in their own lands" is a common refrain I hear from right types. I see this along the lines of good fences make good neighbors. His hatred of converts gives him common ground with his enemies.

Did/do you personally hate foreigners/other cultures? No, I spent many years travelling through many, many nations. Everywhere I travelled, barring a few small exceptions, I was treated wonderfully, often as a guest and even as a friend. The varied cultures of the world greeted me with warmth and compassion, and I very much enjoyed nearly every moment I spent with them. I wish the different peoples of their world all the best regardless of their ethnicity, race, culture of faith and that they live in peace and prosperity, amongst their own people, practicing their own traditions, in their own nations. But, if those same people seek to come to my peoples lands, replace my people, subjugate my people, make war upon on my people, ,hen I shall be forced to fight them, and hold nothing in reserve.

I cannot even oppose what he said. How can you be in opposition to this? Isn't this what the great resistance struggles in Africa were about? Self-determination for all peoples in their own lands with malice to none?

Do you believe those you attacked were innocent? They are no innocents in an invasion, all those who colonize other peoples lands share guilt.

Hmmmm..."colonize other peoples lands"...

Was the attack anti-diversity in origin? No, the attack was not an attack on diversity, but an attack in the name of diversity. To ensure diverse peoples remain diverse, separate, unique,undiluted in unrestrained in cultural or ethnic expression and autonomy. To ensure that the peoples of the world remain true to their traditions and faiths and do not become watered down and corrupted by the influence of outsiders. The attack was to ensure a preservation of beauty, art and tradition. In my mind a rainbow is only beautiful to due its variety of colours, mix the colours together and you destroy them all and they are gone forever and the end result is far from anything beautiful.

I'll let that stand and point to his latter statement:

Why is it that what gives Western nations strength(diversity)is not what gives Eastern nations(China, Japan, Taiwan,South Korea)their strength? How are they so strong, China set to be the worlds most dominant nation in this century, whilst lacking diversity? Why is that their non diverse nations do so much better than our own, and on so many different metrics?

I have made the same observation. All the companies that were wildly successful and world changing were NOT diverse in the least bit. Go ahead and disprove his statement.

Why do you believe you will be released from prison? I do not just expected to be released, but I also expect an eventual Nobel Peace prize.As was awarded to the Terrorist Nelson Mandela once his own people achieved victory and took power. I expect to be freed in 27 years from my incarceration, the same number of years as Mandela, for the same crime.

I find the reference to Mandela odd. Mandela killed no one (to my knowledge) and definitely did not go on a killing spree. I'm NOT surprised he called him a terrorist since the shooter described himself the same way.

Democracy is the only solution, why are you committing to force? Democracy is mob rule and the mob itself is ruled by our enemies. The global and corporate run press controls them, the education system(long since fallen to the long march through the institutions carried out by the marxists)controls them, the state(long since heavily lost to its corporate backers)controls them and the anti-white media machine controls them. Do not suffer under the delusion of an effortless, riskless democratic victory. Prepare for war, prepare for violence and prepare for risk, loss, struggle, death. Force is the only path to power and the only path to true victory.

As I said earlier. All this censorship and "unpersoning" of large segments of the population has only one ending. I've been warning people of this for years. Ballot or Bullet. True when Malcolm said it. True now.

To Conservatives Ask yourself, truly, what has modern conservatism managed to conserve? What does it seek to conserve? The natural environment?Western Culture? Ethnic autonomy? Religion? The nation? The race?

This is a very common theme on the dissident right. Conservatism is seen as Conservativsm Inc. The right wing of the left global political system. It has conserved nothing. If the Republicans were actually conservative there would, for example, be no homosexual marriage in America (or anywhere else in so called Christendom) and Trump would *not* be president of the United States. Conservatives are essentially whatever liberals were 10 years prior. All are deathly afraid of being called sexist or racist and everyone knows it. That's why every leftist in America loves George Bush and John McCain now. And since there is no effective representation of those who are not left I bring you back to the discussion of democracy. Ballot or bullet.

The Rape of European Women Invaders

I actually thought this part would have played a larger part in the "why did you do it?" part. However; in retrospect, I think his weeping at the cemetery had much to do with what follows.

Many of you may already know about the rape of British women by the invading forces, Rotherham of course being the most well known case. But what few know is that Rotherham is just one of an ongoing trend of rape and molestation perpetrated by these non-white scum. A list of wikipedia entries from the most well known British rape cases follows:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scan dal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aylesbury_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banbury_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derby_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huddersfield_grooming_gang
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keighley_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keighley_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcastle_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Doublet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterborough_sex_abuse_case
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telford_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

I had no idea that there were that many. I follow Tommy Robinson on YouTube and I still had no idea. When I first heard about Rotherham I was in utter disbelief. The British had fallen so low that in order to not be called racist they would *allow* their children to be raped and pimped out? These are the same people whose empire the sun never set on?

The failure of Assimilation Expecting immigrants to assimilate to a dying, decadent culture is laughable. Who would willing leave their own strong, dominant and rising culture to join an elderly, decaying, degenerate culture? What culture would entice a man, one of traditions, beauty, architecture, art and prosperity, or a culture of decay, self-hatred, childlessness, disorder and nihilism? More immigrants are choosing to retain their own healthy culture, year by year, and even more telling, our own people are beginning to join them, looking outside their own watered down and deteriorating culture to look for purpose and guidance from outside sources. The weaker we become the more immigrants will refuse to join us, refuse to partake in the cultural suicide that we extol. That should surprise no one.

I think this analysis is spot on. I actually have read and heard this very comment from immigrants. The West is seen as a dying entity to be exploited in it's death throes. I remember a discussion with someone who "reverted" to Islam. They made very similar arguments as the NZ shooter.

Green nationalism is the only true nationalism There is no Conservatism without nature, there is no nationalism without environmentalism, the natural environment of our lands shaped us just as we shaped it. We were born from our lands and our own culture was molded by these same lands .The protection and preservation of these lands is of the same importance as the protection and preservation of our own ideals and beliefs.

I bet a lot of people didn't see that coming.

Emotions rule over facts Stop trying to persuade the general population with statistics, charts, tablets and figures. A a one-point-seven percentage point difference may mean something to a few, but a ingeniously worded expression or brilliantly crafted poster will convince the many.

Unfortunately he is correct on this point. Personally I'm not much moved by emotion based "arguments". In fact I'm highly suspicious of those who make those kinds of appeals. Even here on the blog I go to great lengths to provide facts and figures and tell the reader where they can find information. As the shooter said though, emotions rule. It's unfortunate.

Accept Death, Embrace Infamy Death is certain, you may die in service to some grand crusade or pass away in a hospice, either way you will die. What matters is your actions during the brief time between birth and death. The worth of your life is not measured by the length of your life, but your actions during it.

I would think this has it's parallel in "radical Islam". I also think this may be one of the things the authorities may not want young men to consider. "Grand crusade or hospice, either way you die" is a pretty compelling argument...emotional and all.

There is no democratic Solution Understand here and now, there is no democratic solution, any attempt to vote your way out of Ethnic replacement will be met with at first with derision, then contempt and finally by force.

Democracy is mob rule and the mob itself is ruled by our own enemies. The global and corporate ran press controls them,...

This goes back to my ballot or bullet observation. Current events only prove this man's point. The censorship, deplatforming from public spheres, financial spheres, etc. is proof positive of his points. I had to think of the Joe Rogan program with Jack and the Indian legal person. I'm certain a large percentage of people saw her and said to themsleves "why is an Indian telling me what I can and cannot say on the internet?"

When anyone can be a German, a Brit, a Frenchmen, then being European has truly lost all meaning Make no mistake, the erosion of local and national identity has no come about by accident, it is a concerted and targeted effort against the European people.

The idea that a Frenchmen need not speak the language, share the culture, believe in the same god or even more importantly be ethnically French is ludicrous in the extreme. This is an attack on the very french people themselves and is a strategy designed to destroy national, cultural, linguistic and ethnic unity

I have long argued that the export of the American idea of "citizen" is bad. While America is indeed a non-blood and soil insomuch that those who created the *nation* were not indigenous to the land and that it was made of a varied ethnic mix, Europe is the blood and soil home of Europeans. An African from Cameroon who speaks French is NOT French. A Black from Jamaica is NOT an Englishman. Don't care how many generations he's been there. Similarly, I'll never refer to a white person born in Africa as an African much less an Igbo or Yoruba. Mind you the Chinese and Japanese think the same way. Oh and they are very successful and "strong".

Incite conflict.Place posters near public parks calling for sharia law, then in the next week place posters over such posters calling for the expulsion of all immigrants, repeat in every area of public life until the crisis arises.

Funny he should write this as we are observing Jussie. This tactic is being played out by the left for their own ends. This is why you should ALWAYS question news reports about signs and the like found in public places. There are people looking to make conflict in order to "heighten the contradiction". Don't fall for it.

CHEAP LABOUR IS SLAVE LABOUR, REFUSE TO IMPORT MODERN SLAVES

The shooter was anti-slavery.

After an election cycle or two with certain Democratic victory, those remaining, non democratic voting, non brainwashed whites will see the future clear before them, and with this knowledge realize the impossibility of a diplomatic or political victory.

While I cannot say I agree with the time frame I can say that the general idea is sound. You only have to look at the late stages of Obamas presidency. If anything got Trump elected, it was the last two years of Obamas presidency and his embrace of BLM and trannyism.

I skipped over a lot of where he was calling for the assassination of various leaders. I don't agree with it. I understand why he thinks it's the way out but I think the ballot can be effective. For one reason only: large percentage of the population do not vote (particularly in the US). All across Europe there are nationalist parties winning elections. If they get enough power and don't do a Trump (talk shit but do nothing) many of the changes the shooter desires (much of which is common sense) would come to pass *without the murder*. Remembering that in a democracy you don't get everything you want.

Rank Hypocrisy

Socialism is good...until you are the one in possession of the stuff they want to take.