Sure Brandon. Sure.

 I'm gonna leave this right here without further comment.

Right on Cue: The New Variant

 I'm  not going to waste your or my time on this. Anyone with w high enough IQ understands what's going on both politically and biologically.

Politically "variants" are the excuse to extend the 'emergency" which allows governments to indefinitely suspend your individual "inalienable rights" like deciding what will and will not go into your body. They need these variants as cover. Expect the new "omicron" variant to show up in court proceedings. That this variant showed up in "fully vaccinated" people won't matter because they will say that it was the "fault" of the "unvaccinated" as to why "omicron" shows up in the first place.

Biologically, anyone with a high enough IQ knew from early on that a virus that has a high transmission rate and a high mutation rate (facilitated by transmission) will be near impossible to 'vaccinate" against. Prime example being the "flu shots" which have to be "reformulated" every year for what the experts think will be the dominant strains. These shots sometimes have an effective rate in the 30% range. 

So we [who can see] knew the deal.  I wrote many times in this space that the best thing you can do is to find out if you are vitamin D deficient and correct that pronto. If you wasted the past year not getting your vitamin D levels addressed, that's your own fault. Secondly, we know that Zinc and Quercetin were good for prophylaxis and early treatment.  I provided links to the papers showing that they work and HOW they work. By this point you should have a stack of zinc and Quercetin, both available OTC, at the ready.

Lastly, a Spanish study showed that anti-histamines were effective in dealing with elderly patients in nursing homes. You should have some at the ready. 

The FLCCC recommends a mouth wash. If you don't do that, start now. Once in the AM and once in the PM before bed. If you're going out, take a hit before you go and then again as soon as you get back. The idea is to kill anything in your throat before it can move down into the lungs in large numbers. I'm partial to oil of oregano but it's strong and some people may not want to have that taste on their breath.

Lastly, it's wintertime. This means that you're indoors a lot. You should make sure to have good air filtration. I have one that runs  24-7. Been doing that for years. When I saw what was filtered out I was a believer. Also indoor humidity is very important. Dry nasal passages are a big reason for seasonal flues and COVID. I personally don't like to see below 40% but if you're below 30% you should look into a humidifier or keep water boiling on your stove to bring it up. Just remember that if it's TOO damn you run the risk of mold.

So don't fall for the fear campaign.

Ahmaud Part 8: The Verdict

 So the three men have been found guilty of felony murder. For those unfamiliar, felony murder is when during the commission of some crime a person or persons are killed.  Even if there was no intent to kill, the fact that you were committing some other crime, makes that homicide murder. This is significant because as I had been arguing, I did not see how they could be found guilty of murder because there would be the issue of intent. Since those guys claimed that they were trying to do a citizens arrest, it would be nigh impossible to prove criminal intent. So here I will explain why I both agree and disagree with the verdict.

Putting on my "if I'm the juror" hat (I've been there a few times), given what I know about the case, there were two major things that would support the jury's verdict. First is that evidence of Ahmaud using the "jogger" routine as cover for his known criminal behavior was NOT allowed in this trial. This is key. I have argued from the beginning that the "innocent jogger" claim was and is bogus. I stand by that. Why? Because I'm a runner. I know many runners and not a single one of them would EVER stop their run to trespass on someone's property (under construction or not) and look around. No not even, as some tried to claim, "to get water." 

I also know that people who engage in criminal behavior like that ALWAYS have a "cover" act. They don't just go up to their victim or target all obvious about their intentions. So to me, the whole "jogger" thing smelled of cover and that evidence of prior behavior underscored that. However; the jury did not get that information and couldn't presume it. Hence they could only consider that Ahmaud was in fact "just a jogger".

The second thing was that, as I understand it, the testimony was that the defendants not only didn't see the burglary or tresspas themselves, but that they didn't even know about it.  I've seen the diagram of the events as well as "non-sworn" testimony to the contrary and believed that even if they didn't actually see the alleged burglary or trespass but that they were told he was there or had just left. Which brings me to a common point I make here: People say things all the time but when they are under oath, the truth usually comes out. If the defendants did not see the events and had not been contacted about the events, then the jury could reasonably conclude that their going after and detaining Ahmaud was unlawful and the resulting death was a murder. 

Those same set of circumstances eliminates the self-defense claim made by the defense because it would be Ahmaud that was defending himself, even though he clearly grabbed the gun.

So based strictly on the rules of the court and the instructions given to the jury I cannot disagree with their conclusion. I don't think appeals will go far because both the evidence of the "jogger cover" and the "we were told he had just..." evidence would have to be considered. That would require someone to recant testimony. I don't see that happening.

Charlottesville and Waukesha

I saw the news of the red vehicle driving through a Christmas parade. Decided not to post about it though I had a good idea on the who and why.  To test my theory, I decided to wait 24 hours and see if it dropped out of my newsfeed. If it did, then I knew I was right about the "who" and the why would soon come out.

Sure enough, 12 hours later, my news feed lacked any mention of what appears to be a total hate crime and mass murder. Sure enough hours later, the "who" was verified and the why a high likelihood.

I'm not going to rehash my commentary on the [lack of] black leadership who are in part to blame for this incident. What I'm going to do instead is compare this to Charlottesville because this case will show the US population what kind of "justice system" we have (although the situation surrounding the Jan 6 people is bad enough).

So for those unfamiliar, there was a 'right wing" Unite The Right event in Va in which the police and state government totally failed in their duty to protect the attendee's first amendment right to peaceful assembly.

As a result, multiple skirmishes broke out between various parties. At some point a person named James Field ran his vehicle into a group of protestors which resulted in the death of one person

Avowed neo-Nazi James Fields Jr. was given a second sentence of life in prison for killing a woman and injuring dozens when he rammed his car into a group of people protesting a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017.

On Monday, Charlottesville Circuit Judge Richard Moore sentenced Fields to the life term plus 419 years and $480,000 in fines, in keeping with a jury's recommendation.

So note. guy runs his car into a crowd. One death. 419 years and $480k in fines.

Now, this guy in Waukesha has a history of anti-white statements (and apparently a self-confession of pimping out a minor). He ran into a crowd of people where at least 5 died and "dozens" injured.

If driving into a crowd in Charlottesville with one death merits 419 years. We should expect no less for this guy. In fact, by the Charlottesville logic, this guy should be up for 2100 years. Let's see what happens.

The Rittenhouse Verdict: Y'all Need Better 'Leaders'

 I didn't comment on the Rittenhouse case for a few reasons: 

1) The exculpatory evidence was so strong that the case should never EVER been brought to trial.

2) The self-defense case was so strong that the only real news that could come out is if the jury convicted.

I did watch video of the trial and discovered the case was stronger than I imagined. It is and was a clear case of malicious prosecution. But this post isn't about the case. This post is about the media and political talking heads and black folks. Yes, this post is directed specifically at black folks.

Y'all need a better class of leadership. As a matter of fact you need leadership WITH class. These people have you out here defending pedophiles. Actual convicted sex offenders. For real. When did that become OK in the black community?

These talking heads got you speaking against [armed] self-defense. Since when is the black community against armed self-defense? Do you people not even know your own history? How are you going to say Harriet Tubman is a hero to you but then turn around and talk about "transporting a gun across state lines"?

The "F" is wrong with y'all?

How are you going to say that the Black Panthers are hero's to you but then turn around and talk about he shouldn't have had a gun and he crossed state lines?

The "F" is wrong with y'all?

The Deacons for Defense are supposed to be hero's to y'all but y'all against being armed and crossing state lines?

The "F" is wrong with y'all?

Amy Garvey traveled armed and the UNIA had the African legion and y'all complaining about self-defense?

See the problem with far too many.of you is that white people and whiteness are the sun, moon and stars to y'all.  Too many of your leaders (they aren't mine) are making large bank making and keeping you deaf dumb and blind. People like Joy Reid are paid more in a year than a lot of you will even retire with (assuming you CAN retire) to tell you straight out lies.  These politicians being paid with the taxes taken off the top of your paycheck (if you even still have a job) and they lie directly to your face.

You should be glad Kyle was acquitted. It means that YOUR right to self-defense is secure. That's GOOD for you black people.  You do realize YOU are a citizen right? You do understand that you have the same rights as Kyle right? 

Carter G. Woodson said that the negro, that;s you, is so conditioned to his condition that when there is no 'back door" he will go make one for himself. That's y'all. denying your own right in order to own someone you were told was a white supremacist.

Y'all stupid.

These white liberals told y'all who to be mad at and too many of y'all were all "Yass boss. We sick."

Imagine our ancestors saying some dumb "sh" like "Mz. Tubman, we can''t be crossing no state line with that gun."

So lets be clear on what lies they told you:

1) No he did not cross state lines with a gun. The gun was already in the state.

2) In that state a person his age can open carry a gun. That's why the judge threw out the charge.

3) All the evidence showed that Kyle was attacked and waited until the last second to shoot his attackers. YOU should and are free to do the same if similarly situated.

4) Though it wasn't relevant to the case at hand, each of those persons were already convicted criminals. One of which was a known pedophile. He was literally assaulting [another] minor when justice was served to him. 

5) Not that it matters, but none of those shot were black.

Those are the facts, And if you didn't get those points from the media heads and politicians you "trust" then YOU have a serious misinformation problem and need to seriously re-evaluate not only what it is you believe but WHO you trust for information.

Lastly, if they've been lying to your face all this time about Kyle, how much lying do you think they are doing in regards to COVID?

You better think long and effing hard on that last point.

Kyle R Not Guilty

 As the evidence showed.

Let the lawsuits begin!

It Didn't Work The First Three Times So...

 

In the science world there is this thing called "replication". If you take an experiment and do it over and over again and get the same results then you pretty much know what to expect the next time. If the results are something you don't want to have happen, then you have to, you know, change the experiment. After all, you already know the likely outcome.

Here we have Austria "re-imposing" a full COVID lockdown.

"Austria will enter a fourth national lockdown on Monday as Covid-19 cases continue to surge, becoming the first country in Western Europe to impose stringent measures this fall."

4th national lockdown?

 Their first lockdown came in March 2020. They thought it worked because they saw a small blip. But as the chart showed, the reason for the "small blip" was that they were "out of season". It had nothing to do with lockdown. Then they had a quiet "off season". Again, they thought it was the masks they imposed. But we know that coronaviruses are seasonal. 

In Oct of 2020 they introduced lockdowns again. However there was no effect and the spike was much larger than the first. This was their first 'full season". Note that by April of 2021 they were back down into the range of their April count. And I believe that the count in April was an undercount. 

Not satisfied with the October one, they introduced anther in Feb 2021 which also did nothing.

Now with 65% of their population "vaccinated" they are having a case spike that is the largest they've seen. What changed? 

Right.

The "good" thing about their current situation is that the death rate, which trails the case rate is slower than last season. 

That aside. The whole "lets do another lockdown" is ridiculous. 

"The country’s unvaccinated are already barred from leaving their homes for non-essential purposes.

Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg announced at a press conference on Friday that those lockdown measures would be extended to the entire country from Monday. The lockdown would last for a maximum of 20 days, Schallenberg said, but would initially be put in place for 10 days."

Here we are with governments deciding who and what work is "essential" again. 

And oh look, those who took the shot and thought they were exempt are being locked up too. And yes, they are being locked up. This is an open prison. You are being locked up "for your own good". And I'm pretty sure a number of these people who took the shot(s) were looking down on the "unvaccinated" and sneering as they "got their freedom". 

Oh, and you thought you owned your body?

"In a first for the region, he also announced that Covid vaccination would become mandatory in Austria from Feb. 1." 

Ha. Sure.

Look, the only reason any of this is in effect is because: 

1) The people accept it.

2) The police enforce it.

When the people stop accepting it and the police refuse to enforce it, the entire thing stops. This is why I have repeatedly put the spotlight on the enforcers (police). They are the gatekeepers. If they refuse to enforce these anti-human policies, then the policymakers are no more than speakers. 

But the reason they do not is because of that human failing where once given power over others, a lot of people will "follow orders" because they get a kick out of being a person who can say "no".

There are a lot of such people in America. The one thing stopping them from going full Austria is that there is a large armed population. That large armed population is kept in check by a combination of respect for law and order, fear of the feds, and the occasional sheriff who tells his deputies to "act like they know." But trust and believe that if the US was as disarmed as these other countries we'd be in no better shape here.

So You Wanted $15 Per Hour Eh?

 I'm not against people being properly paid for their labour. What I do know is that you can't force someone to use YOUR labour. I also know that some jobs were never meant to be jobs that supported a person as their sole source of income. Also generally, the less skill your job requires, the less pay you get because there are that much more people who can do that job. But what happens when you ask for too much money for your labour? What happens when you're not competing with other people, but with machines that require no breaks, no "benefits" and can work 24/7/365? Well a lot of people are going to find out:

Meet your $1/hour replacement. Why not "free"? Well, all machines require maintenance and have an upfront cost. So say you have 3 "cooks" who require a $24k/year salary for 3 shifts. That's $75k. You get one of these machines to do their work all day. Even if it costs you 24k/year to maintain, you've saved 50k.

Here's their projections/cacluations:

Now what?

I've had a lot of posts on automation and AI and the disruption it's going to create. Don't sleep.

Ahmaud Part 7: The Trial

A lot of people were "upset" because I did not agree with the "running" narrative. None of it made sense given what we knew at the time. I found it most preposterous that people were making claims like: 

" When I run, I regularly go onto homes undergoing renovation/construction and look around."

No. Nobody, no real runner, does this. 

There were other claims made about whether he was trespassing or not. I believed (and still believe) he was trespassing.

I have also said that in the end, we will know the facts when people are put under oath with the threat of jail time if they are caught lying. And now:

So, under oath:

1) Not jogging. Check

2) Was casing out property for "weeks and months" and had been caught on video doing so.

3) The Homeowner had called police multiple times and asked neighbors to intervene.

4) Police told neighbors they believed Ahmaud was committing burglaries and they should consider him armed and dangerous.

The trial is still ongoing. Maybe some of these people have perjured themselves. I doubt it. But if they haven't then I have a word for the NYC marathon organizers:

Shame on you for perpetrating a fraudulent narrative when you should have stayed out. 

Lithuania: Police State

I'm certain that some people are "bored" or "bothered" by all the COVID talk on the blog. The below is an example of why I do this:

 

 

If you don't think that people in power here in the US aren't looking at Lithuania and wondering how they can do the same thing here then you have not been paying attention. This is why I continue to provide evidence and data.  This is THE human rights issue of the day. THE.

Those Durn Case Numbers

 A while back I posted some UK data and discussed how one should not be tricked by "per 100k" numbers because 1% of a huge number is a far greater number than 1% of a small number:

"Going back to our 1000 vs 100 example. Say that 1% of the 1000 population dies of the shot. Again that's 10 people. However in the smaller group, if you had 10% of them die from not being vaccinated, then it would be the same numbers dead. This is why even "low" failure rates on a widely used medicine is, well SHOULD, be alarming to anyone who is numerate. a 1% failure rate of a drug given to 330 million people is 3.3 million dead. If you do a proper long term study with say 100k people and found out 1% die, at least you only killed 1,000 people rather than 3.3 million."

 

So here we have some data out of the UK again and lo and behold:

 

Oh.

Notice the outlier "unvaccinated" group is the last group to have been offered the experimental drug.

Here's the link to the source material (always look at the source material. Don't take my word for it):

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1032859/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_45.pdf

Once again we'll see that the 40-49 age group is where the inflection point resides:

basically, if you are 50+ years old and you take one of the shots and you get infected with COVID to teh extent that you present a positive PCR high enough to indicate a high viral load, your chances of dying, vs a non-vaccinated person of the same age and co-morbidity status is MUCH higher. 

Dems the numbers. Just like I said would happen as the "vaxxed" population grows.
 

COVID 1996

 

Thanks Tony Heller

That Durn "Horse Dewormer"

 Sorry for not posting over the past week or so. There are reasons for that which may be discussed in this space soon. No I'm not sick. Onto the topic. 

I'm going to keep this brief. We know that since late summer the CDC and allied propaganda outlets have done all they could to discredit the use of Ivermectin. There were various reasons for this but the primary one, the topic of this entry, is that the Pharma companies want to "make room" for their upcoming products that they could patent and sell at a high mark up. And so recently we have had numerous reports of the "new pill' that will "change everything" and "end the pandemic".

Not surprising.

So here's a nice video by Dr. John Campbell about the new drug:

Now a lot of the scientific jargon here may go over your head. That's OK. The short story here is that the pill prevents viral replication by targeting the enzyme responsible for cutting proteins.

Here's the thing. Ivermectin does the same thing and they know it.

So here is a screenshot of compounds that have the ability to do what the "new pill" does:

So the shorter bars indicate more effective inhibition. Note there are only two items that shows near total inhibition: Ivermectin and the GC327 product.

Here's the screenshot with the referenced Nature article shown:

Here's a screenshot of the article itself:

Now note the date: Jan 2021. This means that when the CDC and other outlets started making the claim that Ivermectin was not effective, they were lying. Straight out lying.

Why were they lying?

Right back to the opener: They have a product, that they can patent, ready to sell.  If you haven't figured out that the COVID racket is making a LOT of money for a LOT of people and therefore they will stretch this out as long as possible and guide policy that will allow them to realize returns well into the future, you have NOT been paying attention.

Note that "in silica" is a fancy means of saying "computer simulation". You may object to using computer simulations as "proof" that Ivermectin works. I would remind you that the current mRNA shots were created by the same modeling process. So if you object to one on those grounds, you must also object to the other.