SCOTUS dropped it's Colorado decision yesterday. Every sane person knew what to expect, insofar as Colorado would be overturned. The question was what the four liberal justices would do. Well they got a 9-0 decision. This decision revealed or re-enforced a few things.
1) Keith Oberman is not a stable person. His unhinged tweet yesterday should give his employer, if he has one, reason to terminate their relationship. He should be persona-non-grata in any circle of sane people.
2) Keith Oberman shows people who are nominally left, that they took will be the target of radical leftism when the latter decides that their previously acceptable positions are no longer acceptable. They will also change up on you on a dime if you cross them.
Once again, you have been warned.
You would have thought that since it was a 9-0 decision, people who had sworn up and down that Colorado was right, would be eating humble pie and admitting their error.
3) Neither Trump nor SCOTUS need to prove Trump is innocent of "Insurrection". A lot of left commentators pointed out that SCOTUS did not "exonerate" Trump of insurrection. These barely literate people apparently do not understand that in America:
A) The accused doesn't have to prove a damn thing.
B) Trumps actions on that day were not the point of the decision.
It actually would have been out of order for SCOTUS to discuss the claims of insurrection. Their point was that the constitution, via the 14th Amendment and further acts of congress had designated the power to CONGRESS to exclude federal officers.
When I made a video on the matter, I conceded that the states have a limited ability to exclude candidates. SCOTUS said the same thing.
4) The left wins by declaring "facts" whether they are facts or not. The left commentators has declared Jan 6 an insurrection and that's that. If the left is to be defeated, their terms, their "facts" must be dismissed. This is the same tactic used with the tranny nonsense. They up and declare a man who thinks they are a woman is a woman and will punish you for not accepting the clearly false statement. We must, at each and every opportunity reject the premises (that are false). Playing along in order to be cordial or escape being called an 'ist" or "phone" is not a winning strategy.
5) There needs to be consequences. The lawfare being used to corrupt this election has to be met with consequences. It is not enough to "be so ordered" by SCOTUS. Trump's civil rights were blatantly violated, as Colorado is wont to do to conservatives (see the baker) and those doing so need to be held to personal account. If election workers in Ga can be handed millions for defamation by Giuliani, then this Colorado election secretary (or whatever) should meet a similar fate (though I am in favor of jail time). Also, since this is the second time SCOTUS has had to overrule COLORADO on basic constitutional issues, there needs to be a house cleaning. I saw someone comment that when police departments are found to be deficient, they get "consent decrees" where they are overseen by a body. This needs to happen to the Colorado courts (and NY too).
The next shoe to drop will be the immunity case. I'm on record saying that they will not say that the president has total immunity. They will probably say that like police they have an assumption of lack of mens-rea and so long as their behavior is within the scope of executing the duties of their office, they are generally immune. If they do NOT make such a finding Obama is facing murder charges (not that he would necessarily be convicted).
I believe that some on the left will regret having stirred this particular pot.
We shall see.