Wednesday, January 19, 2022

The Djokovic Affair: Not About Health Or Safety

 If you thought that the Djkovic issue was just Australia then you are extremely naive about what is going on here. No sooner had Australia deported  Djokovic, other sporting "authorities" stepped up to show their allegence to the WEF NWO.

The French authorities said this week that players must be vaccinated to compete in the French Open — the next of the four Grand Slam tournaments, scheduled for May.

And:

The authorities in Spain, where Mr. Djokovic owns a house, have urged him to “lead by example” and get vaccinated. In Monte Carlo, where Mr. Djokovic also has a house, the organizers of a tournament that he has previously won said they were awaiting guidelines from the French government for the 2022 edition in April.

And :

Mr. Djokovic might be able to compete in Wimbledon in June, but under current guidelines he could be barred from competing in the U.S. Open a few months later, since foreign travelers must be vaccinated to enter the United States, with very limited exceptions.

Let me remind you that it is already known that these "vaccinations" do nothing to stop infection or transmission of COVID. Again, this is widely known and not in dispute. Hence, everybody and anybody attending any event is just as likely to get infected and/or transmit regardless of whether they took a shot. Therefore; it is clear that this is NOT about health. This is not about safety. This is a compliance test and a lot of people are more than willing to comply.

"“Who would understand if we asked our citizens to make an effort and respect the rules if we authorize some to get out of them?” Stanislas Guerini, the leader of President Emmanuel Macron’s party, said on French radio this week. He called Mr. Djokovic’s behavior in remaining unvaccinated “irresponsible.”"

There it is. First you didn't ASK, You made a demand on the citizenry. Those who willingly took a shot did so of their own free will. But the state has and continues to coerce those who made other choices. That is not an ask.  

Secondly here is the "responsible" talk that I discussed in the last Garvey's Ghost TV episode. This claim that so and so is being responsible is to obfuscate the real message that those people are being compliant with demands that the state put upon them.  Unfortunately too many people see "compliance" as automatically good.

This goes along with what the Australian authorities said about deporting Djokovic. He was a threat to the order because his being "unvaccinated" would lead people to question the authorities and undermine their message. Again, this is not about health. It is about control.

Djokovic is rich. He can retire and do whatever he wants. They know this. This is about making him an example to those who are not similarly situated. Here's what I think Djokovic and Serbia should do:

They should create a "parallel sports circuit" and create a tennis open for all athletes free of discrimination. This is in line with all the talk of parallel economies being discussed. The current regimes must be broken and they can only be broken by being able to bypass them entirely. 

On a side note, I'm a big fan of cycling. I watch Le Tour every year. Many of those cyclist are dead smack in the middle of the age group most likely to get myocarditis from the vaccines. How many of them are going to risk their lives in order to participate? Will we see a cyclist drop dead during Le Tour as we have seen on soccer fields?