Garvey's Ghost TV: 12-31-2021 Commentary Gumbo

 Live at 8PM EST

Last stream of the year. I discuss some "odd" COVID cases, child stalkers in schools. More Public Emergency Abuse, Commentary on Matrix and First episode of Book Of Boba Fett (Spoilers)

Garveys Ghost TV 12-29-2021: The Great Reversal

 Livestream 8PM

 

 

Computing Forever on The Conspiracy

 This guy has been spot on from the jump. I've linked to his stuff before but I think this latest piece is good way to look back at 2021 and seeing it for what it is:

RIP Desmond Tutu

Still being in an altered state of mind due to my current condition, I think the passing of Tutu didn't hit me as it would have had things been "normal". Not to say that his passing is insignificant. I was very much into the situation in South Africa and more of a Steve Biko  and Pan-African Congress fan than an ANC fan. Being youthful I gravitated to the whole "spear of the nation" rhetoric. 

There will be those who disapprove, I'm not looking for approval. My position has long been that if you don't get angry, possibly "wish them all dead" (in reference to the white South African nationals) angry at the plight of black folks in that country at that time, I'd think you don't really care.

Fast forward to after the end of Apartheid and the whole Truth and Justics commission. Honestly I thought it was a cop out. You let people get off so long as they confess to whatever it is they did? On both sides?

How do you do that? How do you judge the actions of those fighting FOR liberation in the same light as those who fight for oppression? Even today I struggle with that. However; for Tutu this was about univeral law. Universal humanity and that those principles should guide every and any side. Honestly I think something else motivated that.

Like others at the time I couldn't understand why there wasn't a "clean sweep" of the SA government and an aggressive land reclamation endeavor a-la-Zimbabwe. I couldn't understand it because I was, like many others entirely ignorant of the situation.

I saw a documentary about Mandela's prison time which featured interviews with other political prisoners and it was then that I understood. Mandela and his comrades came to understand that they could not "kill de-white people" and still have one of the most advanced countries on the continent. The natives had, by and large none of the expertise needed to run such a franchise. Hence the desire for revenge and other feelings that were well studied by Frantz Fanno that could lead to national collapse had to be avoided.

This is what I think that commission was meant to do. I think it worked to a great extent though only a fool would not recognize the killing of white South African farmers as racial revenge. To see how badly that can end up, simply look north to Zimbabwe which would very much like a return of their white farmers.

So in a sense Tutu helped to avoid a violent racial purge in South Africa. Again, not to say everything is a crystal stair. I'm older and wiser now. The fires of revenge doused by discernment, something Tutu had and implemented. 

Thank you Tutu for your service however imperfect.

Garvey's Ghost TV: 12-23-2021: The SARS Boat 8PM

 

Live 8PM

I Am Number 4

 Unfortunately, not the movie (though depending, it may be fortunately)

I'm gonna ask the question again:

When will it be enough for you folks who took the first set?

Do you "unboosted" people not see that you too are soon to join, if you aren't already in, The Unvaccinated?

Do you see that it doesn't end? Are not angry that the promises they made are completely absent?

R U DUN Yet?

I saw people online coping with the whole "well some vaccines have schedules you know"

Yeah,  four shots in one year schedules?

Stop coping. Stop being in denial. Wake up.  Now is the time.

They Hate You

 Yesterday I found out about a family member who was having extended family visit for the holidays. I was told there was a conflict about "who could come". Being the naive person I usually am, I figured this was about certain family members not getting along. No. The actual situation is that certain members have taken one of the shots and others have not and, of course, the shot takers are the ones making the fuss, dictating that the "not jabbed" not attend.

Now me personally, my position is that it is MY house and therefore I decide who may or may not enter, not the guests. I personally would have dis invited anyone who thought THEY had that right.  

They are not the only people with this issue. Families across the world are going through this. In my opinion these people are revealing themselves for who and what they are. They are the people who would have balked at sitting next to a Negro on the bus. They would have been offended by a Negro being in the same bathroom as them. They would have been the people defending slavery and the like. They are the type who would not have batted an eye as Jews were put into ghettos, placed on trains and put into ovens.

The point is that the pandemic has revealed a lot of people for exactly WHAT they are. The culture has moved enough so that they can actually BE who they are without the fear of consequences. They can count on the "authorities" to have their backs. They relish in being the New Master Race.

I saw a post by Jessie Kelly (I believe) where he was pointing out how these politicians and un-elected "public health officials" publicly speak to citizens with unmasked condescension. I remember driving down the NJ Turnpike and seeing the "knocklehead" signage on the traffic boards and I was like, WHO do THEY think they are talking to like that? That is not how a public SERVANT addresses those they SERVE.

As I pointed out in my livestream on Saturday, these people no longer think the government exists to serve the people, they think it is the other way around and they are doing everything they can to make that the "new normal".

During the 2016 election campaign, Hillary Clinton let her mask slip off when she called Trump supporters a "basket of deplorables".  I didn't recognize it at the time, but this was the emergent "eliminationist" language of the new DNC. Many of us, including me, thought this was a Clinton thing but as we have seen, this is a far larger phenomenon. Witness an official WH communication:

First. Omicron is not doing anything. Any disruption to work and school is due to the government and employers. Full stop. 

Second notice the "two tier" society. They are working for the "vaccinated" and the rest of you can FOAD.

Thirdly, the "winter of severe illness" is factually incorrect. We already know that the vast majority of infections are asymptomatic or mild (cold like) symptoms. And by "vast majority" we mean 90+%. We also know that severe cases are largely (again 90+%) among those with specific comorbidities related to metabolic syndrome (obesity, diabetes).

But imagine the level of contempt required to write such a release. I have said many times this year: 

These people are malicious.

Garvey's Ghost TV 12-18-2021: The USSA: Reviewing the 6th Circuit Decision Live at 8PM EST

 8PM EST.

And Now France

 

"PARIS, Dec 17 (Reuters) - France will from next month reduce the time between second and third COVID-19 vaccination injections to four months and require people to show proof of vaccination to enter some venues, Prime Minister Jean Castex said on Friday."-Reuters

So now the French are under a "shot every 4 months" rule to do things that up to March of 2020 were common and normal activities.

Related:

"Prime Minister Jean Castex said on Friday the government will propose a bill in parliament in January to change France's "health pass" into a "vaccine pass", meaning only vaccinated people will be allowed to enter indoor public places such as bars, restaurants and cinemas. read more"

 

The 6th Circuit Lifts The Stay

 Read it here:

https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/21a0287p-06.pdf

We. Are. F****

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree that the government’s motion to dissolve
the stay should be granted and concur fully in Judge Stranch’s opinion. I write separately to note
the limited role of the judiciary in this dispute about pandemic policy. Petitioners and various
opinions discuss at length how OSHA could have handled the pandemic’s impact on places of
employment differently. Some of the writings include sweeping pronouncements about
constitutional law and the scope of OSHA’s statutory authority. Much of this writing is
untethered from the specific facts and issues presented here and overlooks the limited nature of
our role.

 

Reasonable minds may disagree on OSHA’s approach to the pandemic, but we do not
substitute our judgment for that of OSHA, which has been tasked by Congress with policy-
making responsibilities. See Charles D. Bonnano Linen Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 454 U.S. 404, 418
(1982). This limitation is constitutionally mandated, separating our branch from our political co-
branches. “[F]ederal judges—who have no constituency—have a duty to respect legitimate
policy choices made by those who do.” Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 866
(1984). Beyond constitutional limitations, the work of an agency, often scientific and technical
in nature, is outside our expertise. See Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400, 2413 (2019).
Our only responsibility is to determine whether OSHA has likely acted within the bounds
of its statutory authority and the Constitution. As it likely has done so, I concur."

 

And

 

By contrast, the costs of delaying implementation of the ETS are comparatively high.
Fundamentally, the ETS is an important step in curtailing the transmission of a deadly virus that
has killed over 800,000 people in the United States, brought our healthcare system to its knees,
forced businesses to shut down for months on end, and cost hundreds of thousands of workers
their jobs. In a conservative estimate, OSHA finds that the ETS will “save over 6,500 worker
lives and prevent over 250,000 hospitalizations” in just six months. 86 Fed. Reg. 61,402,
61,408. A stay would risk compromising these numbers, indisputably a significant injury to the
public. The harm to the Government and the public interest outweighs any irreparable injury to
the individual Petitioners who may be subject to a vaccination policy, particularly here where
Petitioners have not shown a likelihood of success on the merits. See Coleman v. Paccar, Inc.,

Never mind that the above paragraph says NOTHING about workplace safety, which is what OSHA is about. Never mind that none of the "vaccines" actually prevent infection or transmission. 

And never mind that per the constitution the individual holds the rights over their persons and property as enumerated in the 4th Amendment, not the "government"  or "public".

I have zero confidence that SCOTUS will do any different. And that assumes they even take the case.

As I said months ago, this will be the end of the US as it has been known. The ideology has been thoroughly implanted.

NYS Soars Past Prior Casedemic Highs

 Perusing Worldometers as I am wont to do from time to time, I decided to look at the current numbers in NYS.

NYS has blown by it's peak rates from both March-May 2020 as well as meeting it's Nov-Jan peak. 

The most cases can be seen in NYC.

 Note that NYC has it's mask mandate and it's "vaccine passport" system as well as many companies (including hospitals) requiring "vaccines" for employment.

Any sane place would see that these measures meant nothing in regards to cases and immediately cease and desist but we are not in sane times.

The good news is that while case rates are high, the death rates have not followed and remain quite low. Last January's peak was far lower than the March 2020 Cuomo fiasco and I expect this one to be equal to or lesser than the one seen in Jan 2020. Why? Partially due to better care. I would think a lot of people have gotten the message that early treatment is important. Better serious care (keeping people off vents), The reaping effect of the last two waves and the therapeutic effects of the current "vaccines' on people who would otherwise have tipped over. Those already predisposed to no or mild symptoms, which is most of the cases would not by dying regardless of "shot" status.

Garvey's Ghost TV 12-16-2021: Pharma Fears Liability, CDC On J&J, Closur...

8PM

 

*Removed by YouTube for "medical misinformation". 

Garvey's Ghost Live Stream 8PM

 The Ghost will likely have a YouTube livestream up tonight. Bringing back Garvey's Ghost TV live style.  Assuming I get all the kinks worked out. 8PM

I Tried To Warn Y'all

 

Where I work(ed), I told my coworkers that it won't stop at 2 shots. A lot of them, who are probably glad I'm gone, didn't believe me. This is the second announcement I've seen. 

Serious question for those who submitted to the first [injection] demand: At what point is it enough? Are you of the opinion that you'll take every shot they demand no matter how frequent? 

If so, does none of this even make you think about how [in]effective these shots are? I mean 3 shots in ONE YEAR. Some countries are looking at shot number four. So far, at best, these are symptom reducers. No different (in effect) than Tylenol. Do you trust your employer to dictate any other medication they decide you should have?

Serious question. Remember what they sold you. They said it would STOP infection and transmission. They said if you got these shots that life would go back to normal. That's what you were promised. How much of that has come true for you? If you're in NY the state just said that regardless of "vaccination", you have to put on a mask indoors and that's on top of the barring of "unvaccinated" from many places.

Now, YOU will soon be the "un-vaccinated" do YOU think that is fair?

Now I'm not surprised this came from NYU because their "ethics professor" is just fine with this

It's the CCP Social Credit system coming into being in the US.

 And apparently enough of you are OK with it because well you "feel safe".

Don't Let This Happen To You: A Financial Story

 So per the last post, The Ghost is being shown the door. So as you should do, I checked my accounts to confirm [again] my financial situation. I reached out to the representative of the company that a large amount of my retirement account balance lives in. What I was told left me in tears.

I'm not kidding.

If you work for the state of NJ you need to read this because there is a high likelihood that you are unaware of what's going on with "your" money. So when I started working for the state of NJ, I had a 403b. At some point, the actual year I do not recall, when I increased my contributions, A second account was appeared on my paycheck. My mistake was that I was only concerned about the total being deducted rather than asking WHY there was a second line with a different code?

Well apparently this line represented the fact that this money was going into a 401A account. What is that? I cannot exactly describe it to you but it contains a SERIOUS kicker if you are less than 55, and I'll add less than 40. Here';s the kicker:

 You do not have access to the employer matching contribution. Nor do you have access to the *gains* made on the employer contributions.  Since most of the time the employers *match* the employee contribution, this means that whatever your total amount is in these accounts, you only have access to at most 50% of it until you are 55.

So say you are 45 and amassed $500,000. You get the boot from your job or leave on your own and  was looking to tap your retirement (20% tax hit along with 10% penalty) you suddenly only have access to 250k. Of course in REAL terms you only have access to 70% of that  ($175k).

So if you got into a long stretch of unemployment, you have far less to fall back on than you thought.

Now sure that portion you can't touch is still growing (hopefully) while you can't touch it, but damn, Imagine not realizing you can't touch it when you needed it? What if you have far less than $250k  and now when you thought you had a year's cushion, you barely have 6 months.

So why have I posted this?

Well if this situation applies to you, I want you to contact your financial advisor and find out what is allocated where and what you have access to for an extended emergency...like legal representation.

The Ghost Is Terminated

So today at 11AM, I received notice of pending termination due to "non-compliance" with the "vaccine mandate" at my place of employment. 

I was expecting this shoe to drop. The only question was when. It's one of the reasons posts here have been very sporadic. A little about me:

I've been employed, continuously, since 1995. I had one week without pay (not including furloughs) when I transitioned into this last job in 1999.  Cumulatively I have 30 years of computer experience going back to the Apple computer (pre-Macintosh) and IBM PS2.

22 years at the same employer. No disciplinary issues ever. No negative performance evaluations ever. Created jobs for people who will be there after me. Programs I wrote run entire class programs (yes this is a university) and have been for 15 years. 

Then the pandemic hit.

While I shared the early alarm, I quickly came to realize that something was very wrong. I didn't realize just how wrong things were. See, my mistake, which I discussed in an earlier post, was that I thought there were bright lines that nobody would cross. Lines that *could not* be crossed.

I was wrong and by the time I realized it, it was too late. The plans were being drawn up, the employees had been thoroughly scared and everybody was afraid to lose their jobs. So they all went along hoping the axe wouldn't fall on them. Some truly believed in the narrative too.

I the end though, bright lines were crossed without consequence. I have learned that I am surrounded by many petit tyrants. I am also surrounded by people who are scared to death of these petit tyrants. I am surrounded by people "just doing their jobs".

In the end though, 22 years of service and a flawless employee record meant shit. In the end me and my contributions, current and future, meant absolutely nothing to the admin members who "sat in judgment". They wanted control of my body or they wanted me gone. 

Lesson? Nobody is indispensable. There is no loyalty.

One thing I have kept in mind is that there are a lot of people who are in worse situations than mine. Who have far. less prospects than I do. Honestly, I've had a pretty uneventful life up until now. But you know...variance. Ha. As I've said to people in regards to the pandemic: Everybody is going to get their turn. Hopefully it's not that bad.

So what's The Ghost going to do?

Honestly, I'm at a point where I don't want to work for anyone else ever again.  I'd like to move to a "free state" but that would entail abandoning or dislocating someone who depends on me. I'm not good with doing the latter, particularly during the winter months.

Some of you are wondering about legal options. Yeah, I'm looking at that but there's a lot to consider. Is paying for a lawyer AND the costs of a court fight worth it? Could the time and money be better spent pursuing future "investments"? I'm not dealing with federal mandates, I'm dealing with a state mandate (none of which have had decisive decisions yet). I have a "unique" situation where I have no religious or medical reason to not take any shot hence my claim lies on conscientious objection which, in terms of the mandates is "new" ground.  Say I prevail but not in the way of 'early retirement' levels of compensation. Do I really want to work for people who were willing to treat me like this? No.

So yeah, 30+ years of employment and The Ghost is facing termination for something completely unrelated to work performance. Only in Joe Biden's America.

Y'alls VP

This Is The Time

 No more mucking about. When governments and society oppressed a class of people in America brave souls went and did this:

 

 

Now is the time. You are either the people at the counter or you are the crowd abusing them.

You are either "On The Bus" or you are the people attacking the bus.

It is time for massive levels of civil disobedience and refusal to comply.  It is time to confront the cowardly businesses who are complying with the immoral and illegal discrimination. It is time to put the various PD's on notice that we will not stand and gawk and point our phones but remain impotent as they enforce the illegal and immoral. 

The time is now.

Either you are as bold as the people above or you are a coward unworthy of their legacy.

Official State CrackHouse but You Can't Go To The Gym

 So just in case any the fuck body thinks that these people are about health.

NYC has opened official state crack houses with NYC tax payer money.

But if you refuse to take an experimental biological product YOU can't go to the gym.

I got nothing else to say.

Total "Vaccine" Narrative Collapse

 No, we're not going to talk about the blood clots,  heart problems and deaths. No, instead we go directly to the conceit behind the various mandates: Stopping the transmission. 

Many of us who have been looking at the data and knew of the past in regards to coronaviruses did not believe the claims of stopping the transmission. And since we were and are fair, we waited on data. Slowly but surely the data came out and even the government agents had to admit that the "vaccines" did not prevent transmission or infection. And yet and still governments around the world have been violating basic human rights in regards to deciding what they put in their bodies on this completely fraudulent premise.  Some countries going to the extent of creating camps for people who *may* have had contact with someone who popped up positive. Now we have total evidence that the 'vaccine your way out" argument is a total and utter fraud:

The money shot:

"The first person in Oslo confirmed as infected had attended the party, where at least one employee had just returned from South Africa. All the attendees were fully vaccinated and had tested negative before the event."

"Our working hypothesis is that at least half of the 120 participants were infected with the Omicron variant during the party. This makes this, for now, the largest Omicron outbreak outside South Africa."

"fully vaccinated". "120 people infected during the party."

Fortunately so far nobody has been hospitalized. I'm not a ghoul so I don't wish ill on any of them. Given that they are young and presumably in decent metabolic shape, they were ALWAYS expected to have either no symptoms or mild symptoms. It's been that way since the beginning.

So clearly the "stopping the spread" claim is NOT the real exit plan. In fact there IS NO EXIT PLAN.

The plan is as follows:

1) Shovel money to big pharma for no less than yearly "vaccinations" while shielding them from liability.

2) Get you to "consent" to digital tracking making a universal "papers please" a -la China Social Credit system. This will morph into a means for the state, via corporate entities to control your access to goods and services and hence control your behavior.

3) Long term killing off of dissenters while "training" the next generation to accept the "new normal" as "THE NORMAL" as they will know nothing else and will have the mentality of "what's the big deal with..."

Again, there is no exit plan. The ones at the top know. All they need is for the people below them to "do their jobs" whether they "know" or not. That's the things with grand 'conspiracies"; only a very few need to be in the know, the rest, useful idiots, only need to "do their jobs". This is playing out world wide. There will become a point where it is too late.

Jim Cramer: Just Grow The Moustache And Quit Pretending

 So I don't watch Mr. Shouty. However; a clip of him came to my attention yesterday and though I resisted commenting on it, I decided he needed a dedicated post because he represents more people than you or I may think. So here's the clip via the Dan Bongino show (skip to minute 10 if it doesn't go there directly):

So let's go over why Cramer just needs to grow the mustache:

1) "Eisenhower would be aghast that we have "immunocompromised people" who are incubators  for every variant to come"

Firstly in regards to the latest variant, it was discovered in so-called 'fully vaccinated" people who had also taken a "booster".

Secondly, people who have not taken a shot are NOT immunocompromised. When someone is immunocompromised, it means their immune system does not work as designed. That you may fail to mount an effective immune response to a challenge does not mean you are compromised. You just drew the short straw which each and every one of us will do at some point.  There is growing evidence that persons who take one of the shots ARE in fact immunocompromised as it may be the case that their immune system no longer functions as designed hence the new infections. In stark contrast to those who have successfully fought off the infection. Those persons have been shown to be immune from currently known strains.

So right there Cramer is telling fantastically epic lies.

2) "Walking around lawfully unvaccinated. That's psychotic."

 Yeah sir. See we own our bodies and decide what will and will not be put into it. That right is protected from government infringement via the supreme document of the land. If you don't like it, grow the moustache and take a one-way flight to Germany.

3) "We have governors who want to be president by grandstanding on a foolish "states rights" issue"?

Yeah, that foolish and pesky constitution. I mean why would an elected head of [a] state defend and uphold that silly piece of paper?

4) "The right to get sick" 

Yes. You absolutely have the right to get sick. Whether you SHOULD try to is another argument altogether. But you absolutely have that right. 

5) "The right to get other people sick?"

Depends. You cannot purposely try to infect someone with a deadly disease or poison them and things like that. You CAN walk around minding your own business and if you happen to pass along an illness you have you aren't liable. It's considered the normal risk of living life. Prior to March 2020 that was widely understood. 

6) "Have the military run it"

Openly advocates for a police state. Grow the mustache sir.

7) "If you don't want to be vaccinated you better be ready to prove your conscientious objector status in court."

So first thing with this is that Cramer thinks that the people have the burden of proof here. No. The state has the burden of proof. They must prove that the measure they want to take that completely infringes on the property right of the individual is necessary. Of course when you are itching to grow the mustache, you already think the opposite.

Second, notice that he wants YOU to have the burden of financing a defense in front of the same state that wants to infringe on your rights.  No conflict of interest here. Of course that is why the founders put these "shall not be infringed" rights into the supreme legal document of the land. If you have the right then there is no need for a court case because no action can be taken against you. If an action against your right(s) has occurred then it is the STATE that is at fault.

8) Even then you need to help with the war effort by staying home until we finally beat this thing."

So Cramer is advocating for indefinite detention of citizens.

Grow the mustache.

Also, most sane scientists concede that SarsCOV-2 is endemic and is unlikely to go away. Ever. This is particularly true because it has non-human reservoirs in which it can incubate and mutate. I don't expect Cramer to understand these things. But you the reader should know this so that you can recognize this false argument when it is offered.

I'll say it again: One of the most profound things to have been revealed since March of 2020 is just how many people are good with dictatorships. Same people who think MLK and Rosa Parks are heroes are acting like the people who opposed them and they are too dumb to see it. 

As for Cramer, he revealed himself. Let those with ears hear and eyes see.

Because The First Three Worked

 Times of Israel:

"Both of the doctors work at the hospital outside of Tel Aviv and one of them had recently returned from a conference in London. That doctor then came in close contact with their colleague, likely infecting them, Sheba said, noting that both had received three doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine and were only experiencing mild symptoms."

Oh. And I'm glad it's mild...like 90+ percent of all cases since the beginning.

But then this:

 

Because clearly, the first three worked to "stop the spread".

As I pointed out in my last post. This is not about informing or "helping" you. This is propaganda and it is a bare naked power grab. They know it. They know you know it and they dare you to stop them.

Beware The "Command Language"

A while back (years) I had posts in which I discussed Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP). This came back to mind as I listened to a podcast where the guest was discussing a "mentalist" game in which he asked the listeners to go through a step of "suggestions". He was discussing how at the end of the sequence most people came up with something like an "orange kangaroo in Denmark".

What he was demonstrating was that how the brain can be manipulated into thinking certain things simply by being pushed into a certain direction via input.  In today's society the elites have pushed mass mental manipulation to levels unknown to society. This has been enabled by social media and always on media streams to our mobile devices.

A study came out years ago that discussed how the simple "ding" notification from our devices increases heart rates and stress levels. And that was before the message was even seen. This is why I often turn off all notifications on my device.  For example, I was out running with my heart rate monitor and I had left notifications on and a message came through. I had a 10BPM increase in heart rate for the next 5 minutes or so. 

It's no secret here that after the 2016 election I basically turned off all "news programs" because I realized that they were not "news" outlets but propagandist. By June of 2020 anyone who hasn't come to that realization either likes the propaganda, makes the propaganda (profits off of it),  has been scared senseless from it and needs to recover OR is just that dumb.  

That was an epic run-on sentence no?

One of the things I noted over the years is the increasing use of "command language" in articles and e-mails. The latest to drop into my mail:

Now since I am aware of such "suggestions" my mental block immediately kicked in. That is, I [often] recognize "command language" when I see it and put my defenses up. If you haven't figured it out I'll point it out:

"What to know..."

The header should have said "what we know". When they write "what to know" then they are suggesting to you that whatever follows IS what is to be known. Anything else shall "not be known". 

Second: "Here'swhat you need to know."

Again, they are telling you that you have a need. Really? I need to know? Why do I "need" to know rather than "may want to know"?  By hooking "Here" with 'need to know", they are commanding that what follows is what you "need" to know and anything else is "not needed". 

This is reflective of the authoritarian streak that has permeated the left and through them, is imposing itself on the whole society. You see, thinking for yourself is dangerous to authorities. Authorities must tell people 'what they need to know" and "what they need to do" and "what they need to feel". Also for the people that accept this programming, it is easier precisely because you don't need to think.Why think when you are told "what to know".

Beware of these messages. Train your mind to recognize and reject them. And turn off notifications on your devices. Your adrenal glands will thank you for it.