Thursday, August 15, 2019
Philly Shooting As An Example Of Why Gun Laws Don't Work
So yesterday a felon with a gun shot 6 philly cops.
Not soon after, we had politicians calling for more or "better" gun laws.
Really.
Let's get this out the way: Felons are prohibited by law from purchasing or possessing firearms. Therefore there was no way that this person came into possession of a firearm by legal means.
So apparently it is news to some people that people will get things via not legal means.
Gun laws do one thing and one thing only: prevent the [currently} law-abiding to obtain and carry firearms.
The second important thing of note here is that 6 police officers were shot. They were armed. Being armed is no guarantee that you will not be harmed in an altercation. Hence, it is irresponsible and wrong to make statements that simply by having a gun, the "good guy" will prevail. No. It doesn't work like that.
But also of importance is that at least the police officers had the option of being armed to protect themselves. Politicians do not want us civilians to have the same opportunity. That is unacceptable to me. Why should I as a civilian be less able to defend myself from imminent danger, while a state agent is given that ability? Why do I have to "wait and hope"?